切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02): 91 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2023.02.006

论著

达芬奇机器人盆腔廓清术在妇科肿瘤患者中的应用
王楠1, 李立安2, 范文生3, 马鑫4, 刘洪一5, 赵之明6, 孟元光7,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心妇产科;100853 北京,解放军医学院
    2. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心妇产科
    3. 100007 北京,解放军总医院第七医学中心妇产医学部
    4. 100039 北京,解放军总医院第三医学中心泌尿外科医学部
    5. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科医学部
    6. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心肝胆胰外科医学部
    7. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心妇产科;100853 北京,解放军医学院;100007 北京,解放军总医院第七医学中心妇产医学部
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-09 出版日期:2023-04-30
  • 通信作者: 孟元光

Clinical application of da Vinci robot-assisted pelvic exenteration in gynecological tumor patients

Nan Wang1, Lian Li2, Wensheng Fan3, Xin Ma4, Hongyi Liu5, Zhiming Zhao6, Yuanguang Meng7,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.; Medicine School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    3. Faculty of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100007, China
    4. Faculty of Urology, The Third Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
    5. Faculty of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    6. Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliay Surgery, The First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.; Medicine School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.; Faculty of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100007, China
  • Received:2023-03-09 Published:2023-04-30
  • Corresponding author: Yuanguang Meng
目的

分析达芬奇机器人盆腔廓清术(pelvic exenteration,PE)在妇科部分晚期癌、复发癌患者治疗中的应用价值。

方法

选取2014年9月至2021年12月期间解放军总医院第一医学中心妇产科诊治的19例接受机器人PE患者作为研究对象。总结并分析患者的一般资料、围手术期相关指标和随访情况;复习文献,讨论并分享相关经验。

结果

19例达芬奇机器人PE患者中,初治患者占21.05%、复发患者占78.95%;17例患者接受机器人多学科诊疗模式(multi disciplinary team,MDT)协作手术治疗,其中70.59%为两科联合手术、29.41%为三科联合手术;R0切除率为89.47%,先期化学药物治疗患者占52.63%,严重并发症发生率为10.53%。不同类型机器人PE分析比较,前盆腔PE占52.63%、后盆腔PE占31.58%、全盆腔PE占15.79%;三组的平均手术时间、肿瘤切除最大径、输血率、R0切除率、中转开腹率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);全盆腔PE组术中出血量最多,后盆腔PE组略少,前盆腔PE组最少[(700±444.41)mL比(375±271.57)mL比(147±86.16)mL,P=0.019];前盆腔PE组术后平均住院时间少于全盆腔PE组[(13.80±5.71)d比(22.33±5.13)d,P=0.046]。所有患者平均随访时间(33.05±25.73)个月,中位随访时间23个月;1年、2年总生存率分别为84.21%、63.16%。

结论

达芬奇机器人PE治疗部分晚期癌、复发癌患者疗效确切,合理把握手术指征、高水平的机器人手术MDT、科学的围手术期管理、个体化的综合治疗方案能够令更多患者获益。

Objective

To analyze the application value of da Vinci robot-assisted pelvic dissection in the treatment of some patients with advanced and recurrent cancer in gynecology.

Methods

19 patients who received robot-assisted PE from the first medical center of the PLA General Hospital from Sep. 2014 to Dec. 2021 were selected as the study subjects. Analyze the general material of the cases, the relevant indicators in the perioperative period and the follow-up data. At the same time, review the literature and share relevant experience.

Results

Among 19 cases of da Vinci robot-assisted PE, 21.05% were initially treated and 78.95% were relapsed. 17 patients received robotic MDT cooperative surgery, 70.59% of which were combined with two departments and 29.41% with three departments. The resection rate of R0 was 89.47%, the rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 52.63%, and the rate of serious complications was 10.53%. Compared with different types of robot-assisted PE, anterior pelvic PE accounted for 52.63%, posterior pelvic PE accounted for 31.58%, and total pelvic PE accounted for 15.79%. There was no significant difference in average operation time, maximum diameter of tumor resection, blood transfusion rate, R0 resection rate and conversion rate among the three groups (P>0.05). The total pelvic PE group had the most surgical bleeding, the posterior pelvic PE group was slightly inferior, and the anterior pelvic PE group had the least [(700±444.41) mL vs (375±271.57) mL vs (147±86.16) mL, P=0.019]. The average postoperative hospital stay in the anteriorr pelvic PE group was less than that in the total pelvic PE group [(13.80±5.71) days vs (22.33±5.13) days, P=0.046]. The average follow-up time of all patients was (33.05±25.73) months, and the median follow-up time was 23 months; One-year and two-year OS were 84.21% and 63.16% respectively.

Conclusions

Da Vinci robot-assisted pelvic dissection has a definite effect on the treatment of some patients with advanced and recurrent cancer in gynecology. Reasonable control of surgical indications, high-level robotic surgical MDT team, scientific perioperative management, and individualized comprehensive treatment plan can benefit more patients.

表1 不同类型机器人盆腔廓清术患者手术相关情况
1
Martin AL, Sinha S, Peres LC, et al. The impact of distance to closest negative margin on survival after pelvic exenteration[J].Gynecol Oncol2022, 165(3):514-521.
2
王静,王永军.盆腔廓清术的适应证[J].实用妇产科杂志202137(4):241-244.
3
Alip SL, Kim J, Rha KH,et al. Future platforms of robotic surgery[J]. Urol Clin North Am202249(1):23-38.
4
Chandrakar I, Pajai S, Toshniwal S. Robotic surgery: the future of gynaecology[J].Cureus202214(10):30569.
5
孟元光,翟青枝.达芬奇机器人系统在妇科领域的应用进展及展望[J/CD].妇产与遗传(电子版)20199(2):10-13.
6
王登凤,张国楠.盆腔廓清术患者的预后[J].实用妇产科杂志2021, 37(4):255-257.
7
Rodriguwz-Bigas MA, Petrelli NJ. Pelvic exenteration and its modifications[J]. Am J Surg1996171(2):293-298.
8
Brunschwig A. The surgical treatment of cancer of the cervix uteri:a radical operation for cancer of the cervix[J]. Bull N Y Acad Med194824(10):672-683.
9
李雷,吴鸣.盆腔廓清术治疗妇科恶性肿瘤研究进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志201632(8):804-809.
10
Kanao H, Aoki Y, Omi M, et al. Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration and laterally extended endopelvic resection for postradiation recurrent cervical carcinoma: technical feasibility and short-term oncologic outcome[J]. Gynecol Oncol2021161(1):34-38.
11
Bizzarri N, Chiantera V, Ercoli A, et al. Minimally invasive pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: a multi-institutional case series and review of the literature[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol201926(7):1316-1326.
12
Lim PC. Robotic assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report[J]. Gynecol Oncol2009115(2):310-311.
13
王楠,范文生,杨雯,等.达芬奇机器人手术系统用于子宫内膜癌合并双下腔静脉解剖变异外科治疗1例报告[J].海军军医大学学报202243(9):1110-1112.
14
Laporte GA, Zanini L, Zanvettor PH, et al. Guidelines of the brazilian society of oncologic surgery for pelvic exenteration in the treatment of cervical cancer[J]. J Surg Oncol2020121(5):718-729.
15
李立安,张唯一,马鑫,等.机器人辅助腹腔镜盆腔廓清术的初步经验——附1例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志201515(4):347-349,354.
16
吴鸣.盆腔廓清术的手术种类及其手术要点[J].实用妇产科杂志202137(4):244-246.
17
王一然,王平.《巴西肿瘤外科协会盆腔廓清术治疗宫颈癌指南》解读[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)202117(2):142-151.
18
Martínez-Gómez C, Angeles MA, Martinez A, et al. Laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration in 10 steps[J]. Gynecol Oncol2018150(1):201-202.
19
刘云玥,范文生,顾成磊,等. 达芬奇机器人MDT模式全盆腔廓清术治疗晚期宫颈癌一例[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)202215(4):249-251.
20
Karkia R, Tailor A, Ellis P, et al. Minimally invasive pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy: a single-centre case series and review of the literature[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2022, 274:56-61.
21
Matsuo K, Matsuzaki S, Mandelbaum RS, et al. Utilization and perioperative outcome of minimally invasive pelvic exenteration in gynecologic malignancies: a national study in the united states[J]. Gynecol Oncol2021161(1):39-45.
22
Williams M, Perera M, Nouhaud FX, et al. Robotic pelvic exenteration and extended pelvic resections for locally advanced or synchronous rectal and urological malignancy[J].Investig Clin Urol202162(1):111-120.
23
郝娟,邓浩,张佳,等.盆腔廓清术治疗妇科恶性肿瘤50例临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志202137(4):276-280.
24
Cibula D, Lednicky ŠHöschlová E, et al. Quality of life after extended pelvic exenterations[J]. Gynecol Oncol2022166(1):100-107.
25
Pleth Nielsen CK, Sørensen MM, Christensen HK, et al. Complications and survival after total pelvic exenteration[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol202248(6):1362-1367.
26
Cianci S, Arcieri M, Vizzielli G, et al. Robotic pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies, anatomic landmarks, and surgical steps: a systematic review[J].Front Surg2021, 8:790152.
27
Matsuo K, Matsuzaki S, Mandelbaum RS, et al. Hospital surgical volume and perioperative mortality of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies[J]. J Surg Oncol201919:10.
[1] 马瑞, 杨佩, 田润, 王春生, 王坤正. 机器人辅助髓芯减压术治疗股骨头坏死的效果[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 123-128.
[2] 阳敏, 张婷, 钟玲, 刘军兰, 杜俊泽, 崔翔, 张晔, 范林军. 传统腔镜与达芬奇机器人手术治疗低危甲状腺癌的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 176-179.
[3] 赵国栋. 机器人肝内胆管细胞癌侵犯肝门部根治性切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 603-603.
[4] 夏凯, 高仁元, 吴小材, 孙静, 陈春球, 尹路. 9例盆腔廓清术围手术期情况及疗效的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 696-699.
[5] 谢秋波, 周宇, 宋健, 涂忠, 李想, 汪仁昊, 伍依依, 潘铁军. 全息影像在机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中保留膀胱颈的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 209-213.
[6] 李骞, 成凯, 李传富, 齐硕, 丁成明, 贺军, 陈国栋. ERAS背景下机器人与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 73-78.
[7] 王兆海, 刘兵, 王子政, 汪洋, 赵国栋. 流域学说指导下的机器人肝脏肿瘤靶域切除技术实践[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 33-37.
[8] 王勤运, 许大彬, 张恩犁, 钱海, 赵之明. 完全脏器转位机器人胰十二指肠切除术一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 52-55.
[9] 武雅雯, 叶明侠, 李立安, 王铭洋, 孟元光. 机器人、腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗中晚期卵巢癌的临床分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 352-356.
[10] 张旭, 龚航军, 韩刚. 达芬奇机器人治疗胃癌合并低位直肠癌一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 381-384.
[11] 张妮娜, 李震, 范文生, 徐佳, 顾成磊. 达芬奇机器人模拟手术系统在妇科手术培训中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 364-367.
[12] 陈尚雄, 肖航, 张荣杰, 李超, 张彬, 胡春芳, 郝迎学. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助脾动脉瘤切除重建术近期临床疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 376-380.
[13] 任润玲, 李明霞, 王楠, 王铭洋, 吴迪, 闫志风. 机器人和传统手术治疗子宫内膜癌的应用比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 281-289.
[14] 刘东宁, 何国栋, 姚宏亮, 王锡山, 王贵玉, 熊德海, 佘军军, 胡军红, 袁维堂, 杨春康, 蔡建春, 韩方海, 曾祥福, 何鹏辉, 叶善平, 牛正川, 刘奎杰, 关旭, 汤庆超, 黄睿, 时飞宇, 连玉贵, 官申, 简锦亮, 王振发, 周声宁, 赵书锋, 韦烨, 李太原. “机器人”结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术回顾性分析:一项全国多中心研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 474-481.
[15] 郑成文, 洪涛, 孙滕, 张昊. 机器人和胸腔镜胸腺切除术学习曲线比较[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 15-21.
阅读次数
全文


摘要