切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02): 96 -100. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2023.02.007

论著

单孔腹腔镜在先天性长段型巨结肠分期手术的运用
曾纪晓1,(), 徐晓钢1, 刘斐1, 兰梦龙1, 陶波圆1, 梁子建1, 王欣星1   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,国家儿童区域医疗中心(中南) 广州市妇女儿童医疗中心胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-09 出版日期:2023-04-30
  • 通信作者: 曾纪晓
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82170528); 广东省自然科学基金(2022A1515012254); 广州市科技计划市校(院)联合资助项目(202201020612); 广州地区临床特色技术项目(2023C-TS48)

Application of single-port laparoscopic surgery in staged surgery for long-segment Hirschsprung disease

Jixiao Zeng1,(), Xiaogang Xu1, Fei Liu1, Menglong Lan1, Boyuan Tao1, Zijian Liang1, Xinxing Wang1   

  1. 1. National Children′s Regional Medical Center, Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2023-02-09 Published:2023-04-30
  • Corresponding author: Jixiao Zeng
目的

探讨单孔腹腔镜在先天性长段型巨结肠分期手术的可行性、有效性及优缺点。

方法

回顾性分析2018年6月至2021年6月广州市妇女儿童医疗中心胃肠外科14例不适合Ⅰ期根治术的先天性长段型巨结肠患儿在单孔腹腔镜下分期手术的临床资料。男11例、女3例,1~6月龄、平均2.4月龄;分期手术方式:Ⅰ期在单孔腹腔镜下行结肠造口+肠壁活检术,Ⅱ期在造口术后3个月,经原造口处再次行单孔腹腔镜巨结肠根治术(Swenson-like+Deloyers法倒转),随访18~54个月。

结果

14例均按计划完成Ⅰ期单孔腹腔镜下结肠造口+肠壁活检术和Ⅱ期单孔腹腔镜巨结肠根治术。无一例中转开放,均无需增加Trocar,Ⅱ期单孔腹腔镜巨结肠根治术的平均手术时间(156±21)min,平均术中出血量(5±2)mL,平均切除肠管长度(40±8)cm,平均肠功能恢复时间(9±4)h,平均住院时间(6±2)d,平均术后疼痛评分(3±1)分;14例患儿术后均可自主排便,主要并发症为肛周皮肤潮红(28.57%)、小肠结肠炎(14.29%)和污粪(7.14%)。术后手术切口瘢痕2~2.5 cm,外观满意。

结论

不适合Ⅰ期根治术的先天性长段型巨结肠在单孔腹腔镜下经同一切口分期完成结肠造瘘+肠壁活检术和巨结肠根治术是安全可行的,根治术后近期和中期效果良好,术后切口美容效果满意。

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of single-port laparoscopic surgery in two-stage surgery for long-segment Hirschsprung disease in children, as well as its benefits and drawbacks.

Methods

14 children with long-segment Hirschsprung disease unsuitable for primary radical operation were treated by two-stage single-port laparoscopic operations in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center from Jun. 2018 to Jun. 2021, including 11 males and 3 females; aged from 1 to 6 months; the clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All 14 patients underwent staging operations: the first stage operation was single-port laparoscopic colostomy and intestinal wall biopsy, the second stage operation was performed after 3 months, and all cases accepted single-port laparoscopic endorectal pull-through approach: Swenson-like + Deloyers reversion. The postoperative follow-up of these children ranged from 18 to 54 months.

Results

All 14 patients successfully completed two-stage operations as planned without additional trocars or conversion to open surgery. The second stage of the mean operation time was(156±21)minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was(5±2)mL. The average length of the resected intestine was (40±8)cm. The average time to recovery of intestinal function was (9±4) hours. The average hospital stay was (6±2)days. The average postoperative pain score was(3±1)points. All of them had voluntarily defecated. The main complications were skin flushing (28.57%), enterocolitis (14.29%) and soiling (7.14%). The length of postoperative incision scar ranged from 2 cm to 2.5 cm, whose appearance was fairly good. There were no other complications including bleeding, intestinal obstruction, anastomotic leakage, recurrence of constipation, and fecal incontinence.

Conclusions

Application of single-port laparoscopic surgery, including one-stage colostomy and an intestinal wall biopsy combined with second-stage single-port laparoscopic endorectal pull-through approach can be performed safely and feasibly in children with long-segment Hirschsprung disease unsuitable for one-stage operation. The short-term and mid-term postoperative results, as well as the cosmetic outcome, were relatively satisfactory.

图1 单孔腹腔镜在先天性长段型巨结肠分期手术注:A.Ⅰ期手术腹部切口;B.Ⅰ期手术经腹部切口置入单孔Trocar;C.Ⅰ期单孔腹腔镜结肠双腔造口;D.Ⅱ期SPLEP分离原造口肠管;E.结肠远端和近端分别用无菌手套封闭;F.Ⅱ期SPLEP经原造口处置入单孔Trocar;G.Ⅱ期单孔腹腔镜巨结肠根治术。
1
汤绍涛,常晓盼.对微创外科在先天性巨结肠症应用现状及未来趋势的思考[J].临床小儿外科杂志202019(1):1-6.
2
Brockhaus AC, Sauerland S, Saad S.Single-incision versus standard multi-incision laparoscopic colectomy in patients with malignant or benign colonic disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of the evidence[J]. BMC Surg201616(1):71.
3
Miyo M, Takemasa I, Ishihara H,et al. Long-term outcomes of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: comparison with conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy using propensity score matching[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 201760(7):664-673.
4
兰梦龙,曾纪晓,刘斐,等. 常规器械行单孔腹腔镜手术在儿童普通外科疾病中的临床应用初探[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)202114(6): 353-358.
5
曾纪晓,徐晓钢,刘斐,等.经脐单孔腹腔镜辅助下Swenson-like巨结肠根治术38例[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志2021, 20(9):848-851,865.
6
徐晓钢,曾纪晓,刘斐,等.单孔腹腔镜Deloyers术在先天性长段型巨结肠一期根治术中的应用[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志202344(1):13-17.
7
徐晓钢,曾纪晓,刘斐,等.经脐单孔3D腹腔镜手术治疗小儿先天性胆总管囊肿[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)202114(3): 172-176.
8
Han JW, Youn JK, Oh C,et al. Why do the patients with Hirschsprung disease get redo pull-through operation [J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 201929(5):431-436.
9
Zhang S, Li J, Wu Y, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted operations and laparotomy operations for the treatment of hirschsprung disease: evidence from a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(39):1632.
10
谢崇,潘伟康,高亚,等.我国大陆地区先天性巨结肠症诊疗情况调查[J].中华小儿外科志201839(6):411-418.
11
曾纪晓. 先天性巨结肠非计划性再手术的相关问题[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志201817(2):94-98.
12
IPEG Guidelines Committe. IPEG Guidelines for surgical treatment of Hirschsprung′s disease[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 200515(1):89-91.
13
Thomson D, Allin B, Long AM, et al.Laparoscopic assistance for primary transanal pull-through in Hirschsprung′s disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. BMJ Open20155 (3):6063.
14
Stensrud KJ, Emblem R, Björnland K.Anal endosonography and bowel function in patients undergoing different types of endorectal pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung disease[J]. J Pediatr Surg201550(8):1341-1346.
15
Neuvonen MI, Kyrklund K, Rintala RJ,et al. Bowel function and quality of life after transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease: controlled outcomes up to adulthood[J]. Ann Surg, 2017265(3):622-629.
16
Bjørnland KPakarinen MPStenstrøm P,et al. A nordic multicenter survey of long-term bowel function after transanal endorectal pull-through in 200 patients with rectosigmoid hirschsprung disease[J].J Pediatr Surg, 201752(9):1458-1464.
17
徐晓钢,曾纪晓,刘斐,等.吲哚菁绿荧光血管显像技术在单孔腹腔镜巨结肠根治术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志201221(1):961-964.
18
曾纪晓,徐晓钢.先天性巨结肠诊疗规范化的再思考[J].临床小儿外科杂志2021, 20(3):201-207.
19
兰梦龙,曾纪晓,徐晓钢,等. 先天性巨结肠术后便秘复发再手术19例[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志202120(3):230-235.
20
李玉青,严志龙,冯一,等. 先天性巨结肠小肠结肠炎反复发作危险因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 201636(6):830-834.
21
Muensterer OJChong AHansen EN, et al. Single incision laparoscopic endorectal pullthrough (SILEP) for Hirschsprung disease[J].J Gastrointest Surg201014(12):1950-1954.
[1] 马铭秀, 徐锋, 谢铠岭, 郭亚明, 卢潼辉, 戴朝六. 术前碱性磷酸酶-前白蛋白比值对肝细胞癌切除术预后的评估价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 99-103.
[2] 冯春在, 陈宏, 孙浩, 钟思权, 叶少炜, 周仕海. 经直肠拖出标本的腹腔镜高位直肠前切除术中两种抵钉座置入方法的对比研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 119-123.
[3] 张太平, 翁桂湖, 刘悦泽. 不断推进中国腹腔镜胰腺癌手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 120-123.
[4] 田锋, 郭俊超. 中国微创技术在胰腺癌手术中的应用现状和展望[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 124-128.
[5] 阳敏, 张婷, 钟玲, 刘军兰, 杜俊泽, 崔翔, 张晔, 范林军. 传统腔镜与达芬奇机器人手术治疗低危甲状腺癌的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 176-179.
[6] 陈大六, 宋勇罡, 赵海剑, 张晓雨. 三种不同手术入路的腔镜甲状腺癌根治术临床效果评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 188-191.
[7] 谢秋波, 周宇, 宋健, 涂忠, 李想, 汪仁昊, 伍依依, 潘铁军. 全息影像在机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中保留膀胱颈的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 209-213.
[8] 陈丽茹, 吴小凤, 唐守艳, 吴婵, 邓含, 冯钰. 废液引流俯卧位包的设计及其在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 219-222.
[9] 赖华健, 钟文文, 郭强, 李俊涛, 张翼飞, 叶雷, 马波, 尧冰, 瞿虎, 邱剑光, 王德娟. 二次腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 228-232.
[10] 吴骏超, 和术臣, 王海峰, 王家平, 邱学德. 输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗有经皮肾镜手术史的复杂性结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 233-236.
[11] 宁鹏涛, 俞德梁, 高博欣, 徐蕾, 刘小南. 基于日间管理模式的高龄腹股沟疝Lichtenstein手术25例分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 186-190.
[12] 何菁, 赵佳晖. 左右侧腹膜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除手术结果比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 79-84.
[13] 曹亚娟, 黎兵华, 余德才. 转化治疗联合Laennec入路机器人右半肝切除治疗进展期肝癌[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 116-119.
[14] 黄洁. 腹腔镜肝脏手术中一些值得深入思考的问题[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 267-271.
[15] 于雁宾, 党受琴, 庄云龙, 许世友, 孟令展, 俞鹏, 高远, 李虎, 曹李, 朱震宇. 35例肝血管平滑肌脂肪瘤患者诊治及疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 327-330.
阅读次数
全文


摘要