切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 381 -384. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2022.06.013

病例报告

达芬奇机器人治疗胃癌合并低位直肠癌一例
张旭1, 龚航军1,(), 韩刚1   
  1. 1. 200120 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-06 出版日期:2022-12-30
  • 通信作者: 龚航军

Experience and technique of simutaneous robot resection for synchronous gastric cancer and low rectal cancer: a case report

Xu Zhang1, Hangjun Gong1,(), Gang Han1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2022-11-06 Published:2022-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Hangjun Gong
引用本文:

张旭, 龚航军, 韩刚. 达芬奇机器人治疗胃癌合并低位直肠癌一例[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 381-384.

Xu Zhang, Hangjun Gong, Gang Han. Experience and technique of simutaneous robot resection for synchronous gastric cancer and low rectal cancer: a case report[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 15(06): 381-384.

目的

总结一例胃癌合并低位直肠癌患者的诊治过程,探讨达芬奇机器人治疗胃癌合并低位直肠癌的可行性及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析上海中医药大学附属曙光医院胃肠外科2021年8月收治的一例胃癌合并低位直肠癌患者的临床诊治过程,结合相关文献分析达芬奇机器人用于胃癌合并直肠癌同期手术的可行性及安全性。

结果

患者同期行全机器人腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术+全胃切除术+食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术,手术时间450 min,术中出血量100 ml。术后无吻合口瘘、肠梗阻、切口感染等并发症,于术后11 d顺利出院。

结论

达芬奇机器人应用于胃、直肠多发癌有助于减少患者手术创伤,安全性高。

Objective

We investigated the feasibility and safety of the synchronous robotic resection of the low rectal and stomach malignancies by reporting a case of successful use of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer associated with gastric cancer.

Methods

To discuss the feasibility and safety of the synchronous robotic resection of the low rectal and stomach malignancies, we retrospctively make an analysis of the clinical data from a patient diagnosed as synchronous low rectal cancer and gastric cancer and relevant literature.

Results

The patient underwent totally robotic abdominoperineal resection and total gastrectomy. The operation time was 450 min and the intraoperative blood loss was 100 ml. There were no complications such as anastomotic leakage, intestinal obstruction and incisional infection after operation and he was successfully discharged on the 11th day after surgery.

Conclusions

Simultaneous robotic resection for synchrounous gastric cancer and rectal cancer is feasible and safe and could provide a better mininally invasive option for patients.

图1 胃癌合并低位直肠癌患者术前胃、肠镜检查注:A.胃体巨大结节样隆起,大小约6 cm×5 cm;B.红色箭头示胃窦大弯侧偏前壁Ⅱa型病变,大小约0.5 cm×0.5 cm; C.术前肠镜检查
图2 胃癌合并低位直肠癌患者术前胃、直肠增强CT检查注:A.红色箭头示胃体巨大结节样隆起;B.红色箭头示胃窦局部增厚
图3 胃癌合并低位直肠癌患者直肠增强CT检查注:A.增厚的直肠,浆膜面粗糙;B.红色箭头示肠系膜内肿大淋巴结,考虑肿瘤转移
图4 机器人全胃切除+腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术Trocar位置、术后腹壁外观注:A.胃手术机器人Trocar分布;R1.1号臂,置入无损伤抓钳;R2.2号臂,置入双极钳;R3.3号臂,置入摄像头;AS.辅助孔;R4.4号臂,置入超声刀;B.直肠手术机器人Trocar分布;R1.1号臂,置入无损伤抓钳;R2.2号臂,置入双极钳;R3.3号臂,置入摄像头;AS.辅助孔;R4.4号臂,置入超声刀;C.术后腹壁外观
1
陈双双,马锐.多原发癌的研究进展[J].癌症进展201917(8):883-886.
2
Kim HJ, Kim N, Choi YJ, et al. Clinicopathologic features of gastric cancer with synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer in korea: are microsatellite instability and p53 overexpression useful markers for predicting colorectal cancer in gastric cancer patients[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2016, 19(3):798-807.
3
Takiguchi K, Furuya S, Sudo M, et al. A case of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery for double cancer comprising multiple early gastric cancer and advanced sigmoid colon cancer after revascularization[J]. Surg Case Rep, 2021, 7(1):88.
4
Wei H, Master JF, Chen T, et al. Simultaneous laparoscopy-assisted resection for rectal and gastric cancer[J]. JSLS, 201418(2):323-332.
5
Carbone F, Pace U, Albino V, et al. Synchronous robotic right hemicolectomy and subtotal gastrectomy[J]. Updates Surg, 202072(4):127.
6
Kaida S, Miyake T, Shimizu T, et al. Experience and technique of simultaneous robotic resection for synchronous advanced gastric and rectal cancers: a case report[J].Surg Case Rep, 20206(1):1693-1277.
7
Warren S, Gates O. Multiple primary malignant tumors: a survey of the literature and a statistical study[J]. Am J Cancer, 193216:1358-1414.
8
Peng WX, Liu X, Wang QF, et al. Heterochronic triple primary malignancies with epstein-barr virus infection and tumor protein 53 gene mutation: a case report and review of literature[J].World J Clin Cases, 20219(5):1184-1195.
9
Nanashima A, Kondo H, Nakashima M, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of multiple primary cancers in hepatobiliary and pancreas malignancies[J]. Anticancer Res, 2015, 35(2):1073-1083.
10
Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, et al. Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review[J]. Esmo Open, 2017, 2(2): 172.
11
Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ colon cancer: japan clinical oncology group study JCOG 0404[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260(1):23-30.
12
Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, et al. Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stageⅡ or Ⅲ colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 20172(4):261-268.
13
Huang C, Liu H, Hu Y, et al. Laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: five-year outcomes from the class-01 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2022157(1):9-17.
14
Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT)[J]. Ann Surg, 2019270(6):983-991.
15
Suh BJ, Oh SJ, Shin JY, et al. Simultaneous robotic subtotal gastrectomy and right hemicolectomy for synchronous adenocarcinoma of stomach and colon[J]. J Robot Surg, 2017, 11(3):377-380.
16
Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy[J]. Gastric Cancer, 201821(2):285-295.
17
Lu J, Zheng CH, Xu BB, et al. assessment of robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2021273(5):858-867.
18
Yan X, Su H, Zhang S, et al. Pelvic peritoneum closure reduces postoperative complications of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: 6-year experience in single center[J]. Surg Endosc, 202135(1):406-414.
19
Matsuyama T, Endo H, Yamamoto H, et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the national clinical database in japan[J]. BJS Open, 20215(5): 83.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 张朝军, 袁新普. 腹腔镜辅助低位直肠癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 602-602.
[4] 袁庆港, 刘理想, 张亮, 周世振, 高波, 丁超, 管文贤. 尿素-肌酐比值(UCR)可预测结直肠癌患者术后的长期预后[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 506-509.
[5] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[6] 王鹏, 邵欣欣, 胡海涛, 田艳涛, 钟宇新. 改良MOBS 吻合法在全腹腔镜近端胃大部分切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 267-270.
[7] 李干斌, 侯睿, 郭雅萍, 张潇, 邱小原, 牛备战, 林国乐. 改良经辅助切口回肠造口在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 271-276.
[8] 刘先勇, 秦东梅, 张若梅, 李俊娇, 孟春芹, 邬明歆, 王玉红, 赵新鲜, 徐瑞联, 洪文文, 马玲, 仇玮, 周宇. Her2/Hes1在肠型胃癌Correa级联反应3个病理阶段中的表达及意义[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 321-327.
[9] 赵泽云, 李建男, 王旻. 中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网在结直肠癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 524-528.
[10] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[11] 王国强, 张纲, 唐建坡, 张玉国, 杨永江. LINC00839 调节miR-17-5p/WEE1 轴对结直肠癌细胞增殖、凋亡和迁移的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 491-499.
[12] 孙晗, 于冰, 武侠, 周熙朗. 基于循环肿瘤DNA 甲基化的结直肠癌筛查预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 500-506.
[13] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[14] 王湛, 李文坤, 杨奕, 徐芳, 周敏思, 苏珈仪, 王亚丹, 吴静. 炎症指标在早发性结直肠肿瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 802-810.
[15] 刘福成, 赵欣, 乔海朋, 刘晓峰, 张翀, 张宗明. 保留左结肠动脉的肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 647-653.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?