切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 367 -371. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.06.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的疗效分析
张鑫1, 张磊1, 赵淑萍1,()   
  1. 1. 266000 青岛大学附属青岛妇女儿童医院妇科中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-30 出版日期:2020-12-30
  • 通信作者: 赵淑萍

Effect of abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS in ovarian cystectomy

Xin Zhang1, Lei Zhang1, Shuping Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Women and Children′s Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
  • Received:2020-07-30 Published:2020-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Shuping Zhao
引用本文:

张鑫, 张磊, 赵淑萍. 腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 367-371.

Xin Zhang, Lei Zhang, Shuping Zhao. Effect of abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS in ovarian cystectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(06): 367-371.

目的

探讨腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年2月于青岛大学附属青岛妇女儿童医院行微创卵巢囊肿剥除术145例患者的临床资料,其中50例行腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术(腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组)、45例行单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术(单孔组)、50例行多孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术(多孔组)。比较3组的一般资料、术中指标、术后指标及围手术期并发症。

结果

腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组、单孔组、多孔组患者的手术时间分别为(53.3±6.5)min 、(70.8±6.6)min、(52.3±6.2)min,腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组的手术时间短于单孔组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组与多孔组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组、单孔组、多孔组患者的住院费用分别为(11 850.7±142.2)元、(12 934.6±138.9)元、(11 883.1±131.9)元,腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组的住院费用低于单孔组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组与多孔组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组、单孔组、多孔组患者的术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS)分别为(2.0±0.8)分、(1.9±0.7)分、(2.5±0.8)分,腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组的术后24 h VAS低于多孔组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组与单孔组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组、单孔组、多孔组患者的术后1个月切口美容评分(cosmetic score, CS)分别为(21.1±0.9)分、(21.1±0.9)分、(17.5±0.6)分,腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组的术后1个月CS高于多孔组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔组与单孔组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.999)。3组患者的术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间、术后1个月术后体象量表评分及围手术期并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。

结论

腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术是安全、可行的,与单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术比较,具有手术时间缩短、住院费用降低的优势;与多孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术比较,具有减轻疼痛、美观的优势;可作为一种符合经济效益的手术方式在基层医院推广应用。

Objective

To explore the effect of abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS in ovarian cystectomy.

Methods

Retrospectively collected the clinical data of 145 patients who underwent minimally invasive ovarian cystectomy at Qingdao Women and Children′s Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University from Jan. 2018 to Feb. 2019.50 of them underwent abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS in ovarian cystectomy(the abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS group), 45 of them underwent LESS in ovarian cystectomy(the LESS group), and 50 of them underwent muiti-port laparoscopic surgery in ovarian cystectomy(the multi-port group). The general data, intraoperative indicators, postoperative indicators and perioperative complication were compared in the three groups.

Results

The operation time of the three groups was [(53.3±6.5)min vs (70.8±6.6)min vs (52.3±6.2) min]. The operation time of the abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS group was shorter than the LESS group and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001) .The difference between the abdominal wall suture foecep assisted LESS group and the multi-port group was no statistically significant(P>0.05). The hospital cost of the three groups was [(11 850.7±142.2)RMB vs (12 934.6±138.9)RMB vs (11 883.1±131.9)RMB]. The hospital cost of the abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS group was lower than the LESS group and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The difference between the abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS group and the multi-port group was no statistically significant (P>0.05). The VAS at 24 hour after surgery of the three groups was [(2.0±0.8) vs (1.9±0.7) vs (2.5±0.8)]. The VAS at 24 hour after surgery of the abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS group was lower than the multi-port group and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The difference between the abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS group and the LESS group was no statistically significant(P>0.05). The CS at 1 month after surgery of the three groups was [(21.1±0.9) vs (21.1±0.9) vs (17.5±0.6)]. The CS at 1 month after surgery of the abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS group was higher than the multi-port group and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The difference between the abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS group and the LESS group was no statistically significant (P>0.999). The difference of the intraoperative blood loss, the postoperative anal exhaust time, the postoperative hospital stay, the BIS at 1 month after surgery and the rate of perioperative complication in the three groups was no statistically significant.

Conclusions

The abdominal wall suture forcep assisted LESS in ovarian cystectomy is safe and feasible. Compared with the LESS in ovarian cystectomy, it has the advantages of shorter operation time and lower hospital cost. Compared with the muiti-port laparoscopic surgery in ovarian cystectomy, it has the advantages of relieving pain and aesthetics. It can be promoted as an economical surgery method in basic hospitals.

图1 腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔手术入路
图2 腹壁缝合钳
图3 单孔手术入路
图4 多孔手术入路
表1 三组微创卵巢囊肿剥除术患者的一般资料比较
表2 三组微创卵巢囊肿剥除术患者的术中指标比较(±s)
表3 三组微创卵巢囊肿剥除术患者的术后指标比较(±s)
1
龚瑶,周容,代雪林,等.自制入路通道单孔腹腔镜手术治疗妇科良性疾病60例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2019,35(3):330-333.
2
李珺玮,陈义松,华克勤.单孔腹腔镜在妇科良性疾病中的应用[J].实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(3):170-172.
3
Fader AN, Cohen S, Escobar PF,et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology[J].Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2010,22(4):331-334.
4
孙大为.妇科单孔腹腔镜手术学[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2015,111.
5
孙大为,张颖.单孔腹腔镜手术在异位妊娠诊治中的应用[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2017,33(9):903-906.
6
熊光武.妇科单孔腹腔镜手术器械选择[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2019,35(12):1324-1326.
7
马迎春.单孔腹腔镜技术在妇科手术中的应用:优势、并发症与难点探讨[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2019,57(12):31-36.
8
Antoniou SA, Morales-Conde S, Antoniou GA,et al.Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Hernia,2016,20(1):1-10.
9
施艳军,徐流凤,闵玲,等. "定锚法"脐部整形在单孔腹腔镜术中的应用[J/CD].实用妇科内分泌杂志(电子版),2018,5(36):4-6.
10
王丹莹,刘海元,史宏晖,等.不同腹壁通道在单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术中的应用[J].生殖医学杂志,2017,26(7):689-693.
11
李帅,汤绍涛,李康,等.腹腔镜下免Trocar放入微型操作钳治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2014,35(6):432-434.
12
王元,董春林,余进进,等.疝气钳在妇科良性疾病腹腔镜手术中的应用[J].中外医学研究,2017,15(34):169-171.
13
华玉蓉,张阳,蔡钱根.经脐入路单孔腹腔镜下妇科良性病变手术的难点及技巧探讨[J].江苏医药,2011,37(22):2708-2709.
14
李琦,吴海滨.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效比较[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017,33(9):1758-1761.
[1] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[2] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[3] 李凯, 张志远, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 一种可拆卸组装的腹腔镜手术器械在单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 250-250.
[4] 夏慧, 廖慧, 戴艳萍, 吴俊萍, 杨诚, 李建雄, 刘存东. 医护合作——快速康复模式在单孔腹腔镜上尿路重建围手术期的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 266-270.
[5] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[6] 胡启明, 鄢潇, 尤志学, 黄骁昊. 经瘢痕处单孔腹腔镜下切除多病灶腹壁子宫内膜异位症[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 314-317.
[7] 刘洪云, 李翠, 张海堂, 张玉英, 黄成香. 经脐单孔腹腔镜技术在子宫内膜癌手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 182-184.
[8] 王酉, 严斌, 狄文, 楼微华. 经脐单孔腹腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术在早期子宫内膜癌手术中的探讨[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 173-176.
[9] 蒋露, 郑莹, 杨帆, 王乔, 王娜, 阳川华, 陈宇, 苟嘉妮, 邓露丝, 杨旭. 经脐单孔腹腔镜联合上腹部开腹行晚期卵巢癌肿瘤细胞减灭术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 177-181.
[10] 徐晓钢, 曾纪晓, 刘斐, 兰梦龙, 陶波圆, 梁子建, 温俐妮, 叶志华. 单孔腹腔镜手术治疗Currarino综合征[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 120-124.
[11] 张秩坤, 李中策, 郑奕菲, 戚士芹. 经脐单孔腹腔镜脾部分切除在儿童脾病中的应用体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 116-119.
[12] 曾纪晓, 梁子建. 单孔腹腔镜手术在儿童普通外科中的应用与展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 65-69.
[13] 张可欣, 孙大为, 任常. 国产单孔蛇形臂腹腔镜机器人在妇科领域的应用探索[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 106-110.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?