切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 274 -277. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.05.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

经脐单孔腹腔镜在不同类型全子宫切除术应用
杨鑫1, 沈杨2,(), 徐敬云2, 丁波2   
  1. 1. 210009 南京,东南大学医学院
    2. 210009 南京,东南大学附属中大医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-24 出版日期:2020-10-30
  • 通信作者: 沈杨

The safety and learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in different total hysterectomy: a single-institution experience

Xin Yang1, Yang Shen2,(), Jingyun Xu2, Bo Ding2   

  1. 1. Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
    2. Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2020-08-24 Published:2020-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Yang Shen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shen Yang, Email:
引用本文:

杨鑫, 沈杨, 徐敬云, 丁波. 经脐单孔腹腔镜在不同类型全子宫切除术应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 274-277.

Xin Yang, Yang Shen, Jingyun Xu, Bo Ding. The safety and learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in different total hysterectomy: a single-institution experience[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(05): 274-277.

目的

探讨分析经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(laparoendoscopic single-site surgery,LESS)技术应用于全子宫切除术的安全性,并根据子宫大小、是否合并盆腔粘连分成单纯型和复杂型全子宫切除术绘制其学习曲线。

方法

回顾性分析东南大学附属中大医院2017年3月至2019年11月的80例LESS全子宫切除术的临床资料,均由同一位熟练掌握妇科标准腹腔镜技术的术者施行。定义术中探查子宫大小如孕周数≤8周、无盆腔粘连者为单纯型全子宫切除术,子宫大小如孕周数>8周、合并盆腔粘连者定义为复杂型全子宫切除术。结合手术例数和手术时间绘制2组学习曲线。

结果

80例手术全部顺利完成,无术中并发症发生,无术中更改手术方式。所有病例术后随访暂未发现切口感染、脐疝等术后并发症。观察2组学习曲线,单纯型全子宫切除术经过约20例后,手术时间渐趋平稳;复杂型全子宫切除术经过约26例后,手术时间渐趋平稳。

结论

LESS在全子宫切除术中是安全、可行的,单纯型和复杂型全子宫切除术的学习曲线分别为20例和26例。

Objective

To evaluate the safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery(LESS) in total hysterectomy and to describe the learning curves of the simple total hysterectomy and complex total hysterectomy which are divided according to the size of uterus or combing pelvic adhesion.

Methods

The clinical data of 80 cases of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery performed by the same surgeon from Mar.2017 to Nov.2019 in the Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University were retrospectively analyzed. The patients′ uterine size less than or equal to 8 gestational weeks and without pelvic adhesions were defined as simple total hysterectomy. While the patients′ uterine size larger than 8 gestational weeks or combined with pelvic adhesions were defined as complex type. Then on the basis of operation time and the number of cases, we drew the learning curves.

Results

All 80 cases were successfully completed with no surgical changes in surgery, no bleeding puncture, vascular injury and other intraoperative complications. All patients were followed up, which we haven′t found incision infection, umbilical hernia and other postoperative complications yet. Observation of the learning curve, in the simple group about 20 cases′ operation time was gradually stable. While in the complex group, the operation time gradually stabilized after about 26 cases of the surgery.

Conclusions

The laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in total hysterectomy is safe and feasible. The learning curve was approximate 20 cases in simple total hysterectomy.And in complex total hysterectomy, the learning curve was about 26 cases.

表1 80例经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者的一般资料
表2 80例经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者的围手术期相关指标
图1 40例单纯型全子宫切除术的手术时间
图2 40例复杂型全子宫切除术的手术时间
1
Boruta DM.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: an update[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2016,141(3):616-623.
2
Bradford LS, Boruta DM. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: a review of the literature, tools, and techniques[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv,2013,68(4):295-304.
3
刘海元,孙大为,张俊吉,等.《妇科单孔腔镜手术技术专家共识》解读[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ,2017,10(1):1-6.
4
Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J,et al.Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2010,203(1):1-6.
5
Ichikawa M, Ono S, Mine K, et al. Changing our view of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: a review of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and a report on new approaches[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg,2013,6(3):151-157.
6
Fader AN, Cohen S, Escobar PF, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2010,22(4):331-338.
7
Fader AN, Levinson KL, Gunderson CC, et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynaecology: a new frontier in minimally invasive surgery[J]. J Minim Access Surg,2011,7(1):71-77.
8
Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2009,114(2):157-161.
9
Park HS, Kim TJ, Song T, et al. Singleport access laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a surgeon′s experience with an initial 200 cases[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2011,154(1): 81-84.
10
Uppal S, Frumovitz M, Escobar P, et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: review of literature and available technology[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2011,18(1): 12-23.
11
Subramonian K, Muir G.The 'learning curve’ in surgery: what is it, how do we measure it and can we influence it[J]. BJU International, 2015, 93(9):1173-1174.
12
Moore MJ, Bennett CL.The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.southen surgeons club[J].Am J Surg,1995,170(1):55-59.
13
Fukumoto K, Miyajima A, Hattori S, et al. The learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: an analysis of over 100 cases[J].Surg Endosc,2017,31(1):170-177.
14
Abdel-Karim AM, Elhenawy IM, Eid AA, et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of different urological pathologies: defining the learning curve of an experienced laparoscopist[J]. Arab J Urol,2017,15(3):187-193.
15
刘娟,梁彬华,关小明.经脐单孔腹腔镜在生殖相关手术的安全性及学习曲线[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(3):157-161.
16
桑昌美,邹存华,赵淑萍.经脐单孔腹腔镜在输卵管妊娠手术中的安全性及学习曲线[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(6):344-346.
17
Koyanagi T, Motomura S. Single-incision laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: operative outcomes and its learning curve[J].Experimental & Therapeutic Medicine,2011,2(5):867-871.
18
Barnes H, Harrison R, Huffman L,et al. The adoption of single port laparoscopy for full staging of endometrial cancer: surgical and oncology outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2017,24(6): 1029-1036.
19
Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Elst Mvander,et al. Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery[J].Surg Endosc,2007,21(9):275-279.
[1] 黄泽, 张梓榆, 杨青宇, 赖声清, 李海燕. 乳腺腔镜手术临床应用现状及训练路径[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 122-125.
[2] 卢攀, 汪鑫, 李坚, 陈淋, 郎成, 张伟. 经脐单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 374-374.
[3] 江东根, 依力夏提·艾力, 依布拉音江·阿布力克木, 依力盼·依拉木, 冯瑶, 艾尼玩·木拉克, 艾克拜尔江·阿里木. 基层医院单一术者改良单通道腹腔镜下鞘状突环扎术学习曲线及体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 560-565.
[4] 张斌, 孙代宇, 胡昕, 韩菲, 李久明, 李功雨, 吴伟力, 冯宝富, 彭国辉. 评分系统预测不同经验手术者输尿管软镜术后结石清除率准确性的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[5] 方昌华, 杜霖, 陈鑫楠, 王昊, 王文帝, 张成伟, 秦海翔, 邱雪峰, 庄君龙, 徐林峰, 郭宏骞, 张古田. 以累积和分析法研究保留耻骨后间隙机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 319-325.
[6] 钟魁艳, 邓黎, 姚远洋, 凌开建, 邓媛, 李秋蓉, 王延洲. "筷子技术"于经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除手术的可行性和学习曲线[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 45-50.
[7] 严斌, 缪慧娴, 王酉, 狄文, 楼微华. 经阴道内镜与单孔腹腔镜在子宫切除术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 39-44.
[8] 高洁, 王金玉, 范亚洲, 赵娜, 关乐, 安欣裕, 苏永区. 孕前经脐单孔腹腔镜极简式宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 361-364.
[9] 陈海鹏, 张金珠, 关旭, 赵志勋, 刘恒昌, 姜争, 刘正, 王锡山. 达芬奇机器人辅助直肠及乙状结肠癌根治术的学习曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 205-208.
[10] 张智春, 周远达, 曾庆昇, 李鹏, 杨红杰, 孙轶. 以CUSUM方法分析腹腔镜层面优先入路直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术的学习曲线[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 200-206.
[11] 邵佳申, 张志武, 孟海, 杨雍, 费琦. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效和学习曲线研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 202-208.
[12] 刘璇, 胡正霞, 王晓东, 兰海, 李开南. SuperPATH微创全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的学习曲线研究与临床应用价值分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 73-80.
[13] 孙凤兰, 周萍, 程兴璞, 张倩倩. 腹腔镜全子宫切除术对子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤及术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 149-153.
[14] 谭小云, 张靖, 刘珍银, 陈昆山, 夏杰军, 张明, 郭轶群, 陈穗颜. 盲法与超声引导下进行儿童股动脉穿刺的自身对照研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-5.
[15] 郑成文, 洪涛, 孙滕, 张昊. 机器人和胸腔镜胸腺切除术学习曲线比较[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 15-21.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?