切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05): 274 -277. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.05.005

所属专题: 文献资源库

论著 上一篇    下一篇

经脐单孔腹腔镜在不同类型全子宫切除术应用
杨鑫 1, 沈杨 2 , ( ), 徐敬云 2, 丁波 2   
  1. 1. 210009 南京,东南大学医学院
    2. 210009 南京,东南大学附属中大医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-24 出版日期:2020-10-30
  • 通信作者: 沈杨

The safety and learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in different total hysterectomy: a single-institution experience

Xin Yang 1, Yang Shen 2 , ( ), Jingyun Xu 2, Bo Ding 2   

  1. 1. Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
    2. Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2020-08-24 Published:2020-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Yang Shen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shen Yang, Email:
目的

探讨分析经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(laparoendoscopic single-site surgery,LESS)技术应用于全子宫切除术的安全性,并根据子宫大小、是否合并盆腔粘连分成单纯型和复杂型全子宫切除术绘制其学习曲线。

方法

回顾性分析东南大学附属中大医院2017年3月至2019年11月的80例LESS全子宫切除术的临床资料,均由同一位熟练掌握妇科标准腹腔镜技术的术者施行。定义术中探查子宫大小如孕周数≤8周、无盆腔粘连者为单纯型全子宫切除术,子宫大小如孕周数>8周、合并盆腔粘连者定义为复杂型全子宫切除术。结合手术例数和手术时间绘制2组学习曲线。

结果

80例手术全部顺利完成,无术中并发症发生,无术中更改手术方式。所有病例术后随访暂未发现切口感染、脐疝等术后并发症。观察2组学习曲线,单纯型全子宫切除术经过约20例后,手术时间渐趋平稳;复杂型全子宫切除术经过约26例后,手术时间渐趋平稳。

结论

LESS在全子宫切除术中是安全、可行的,单纯型和复杂型全子宫切除术的学习曲线分别为20例和26例。

Objective

To evaluate the safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery(LESS) in total hysterectomy and to describe the learning curves of the simple total hysterectomy and complex total hysterectomy which are divided according to the size of uterus or combing pelvic adhesion.

Methods

The clinical data of 80 cases of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery performed by the same surgeon from Mar.2017 to Nov.2019 in the Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University were retrospectively analyzed. The patients′ uterine size less than or equal to 8 gestational weeks and without pelvic adhesions were defined as simple total hysterectomy. While the patients′ uterine size larger than 8 gestational weeks or combined with pelvic adhesions were defined as complex type. Then on the basis of operation time and the number of cases, we drew the learning curves.

Results

All 80 cases were successfully completed with no surgical changes in surgery, no bleeding puncture, vascular injury and other intraoperative complications. All patients were followed up, which we haven′t found incision infection, umbilical hernia and other postoperative complications yet. Observation of the learning curve, in the simple group about 20 cases′ operation time was gradually stable. While in the complex group, the operation time gradually stabilized after about 26 cases of the surgery.

Conclusions

The laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in total hysterectomy is safe and feasible. The learning curve was approximate 20 cases in simple total hysterectomy.And in complex total hysterectomy, the learning curve was about 26 cases.

表1 80例经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者的一般资料
表2 80例经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者的围手术期相关指标
图1 40例单纯型全子宫切除术的手术时间
图2 40例复杂型全子宫切除术的手术时间
1
Boruta DM.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: an update[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2016,141(3):616-623.
2
Bradford LS, Boruta DM. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: a review of the literature, tools, and techniques[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv,2013,68(4):295-304.
3
刘海元,孙大为,张俊吉,等.《妇科单孔腔镜手术技术专家共识》解读[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ,2017,10(1):1-6.
4
Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J,et al.Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2010,203(1):1-6.
5
Ichikawa M, Ono S, Mine K, et al. Changing our view of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: a review of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and a report on new approaches[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg,2013,6(3):151-157.
6
Fader AN, Cohen S, Escobar PF, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2010,22(4):331-338.
7
Fader AN, Levinson KL, Gunderson CC, et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynaecology: a new frontier in minimally invasive surgery[J]. J Minim Access Surg,2011,7(1):71-77.
8
Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2009,114(2):157-161.
9
Park HS, Kim TJ, Song T, et al. Singleport access laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a surgeon′s experience with an initial 200 cases[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2011,154(1): 81-84.
10
Uppal S, Frumovitz M, Escobar P, et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: review of literature and available technology[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2011,18(1): 12-23.
11
Subramonian K, Muir G.The 'learning curve’ in surgery: what is it, how do we measure it and can we influence it[J]. BJU International, 2015, 93(9):1173-1174.
12
Moore MJ, Bennett CL.The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.southen surgeons club[J].Am J Surg,1995,170(1):55-59.
13
Fukumoto K, Miyajima A, Hattori S, et al. The learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: an analysis of over 100 cases[J].Surg Endosc,2017,31(1):170-177.
14
Abdel-Karim AM, Elhenawy IM, Eid AA, et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of different urological pathologies: defining the learning curve of an experienced laparoscopist[J]. Arab J Urol,2017,15(3):187-193.
15
刘娟,梁彬华,关小明.经脐单孔腹腔镜在生殖相关手术的安全性及学习曲线[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(3):157-161.
16
桑昌美,邹存华,赵淑萍.经脐单孔腹腔镜在输卵管妊娠手术中的安全性及学习曲线[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(6):344-346.
17
Koyanagi T, Motomura S. Single-incision laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: operative outcomes and its learning curve[J].Experimental & Therapeutic Medicine,2011,2(5):867-871.
18
Barnes H, Harrison R, Huffman L,et al. The adoption of single port laparoscopy for full staging of endometrial cancer: surgical and oncology outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2017,24(6): 1029-1036.
19
Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Elst Mvander,et al. Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery[J].Surg Endosc,2007,21(9):275-279.
[1] 张琼, 彭玉兰, 罗燕. 甲状腺结节超声引导细针穿刺初学者质量控制方法探讨[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(09): 897-902.
[2] 莫湘琼, 牛斌, 苏永辉, 刘星伟. 单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的学习曲线分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 452-454.
[3] 李永宁, 喻超, 李英, 朱昌毫, 王兴, 潘耀振. 单中心腹腔镜肝部分切除术学习曲线分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 376-379.
[4] 刘方, 曹智, 许亚龙, 吉进, 周永强, 王富博. 三站进阶模式在机器人前列腺癌根治术培训中的应用价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 409-413.
[5] 杜军, 李俊生, 费伯建, 金留根, 蒋晖, 陈柏, 谢立飞. 腹腔镜下胃底折叠术的学习曲线分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 123-127.
[6] 戴文娟, 陆建红, 李加芬. 人文医疗在阴式全子宫切除术联合阴道后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂合并肠疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 71-75.
[7] 朱一萍, 隋孟松, 郑真真, 吉梅, 张彦丽, 孙静. 经阴道自然腔道腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的学习曲线[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 85-89.
[8] 赵宁, 张翊乔, 王鈢, 朱明玥, 滕长胜. 全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术十步法学习曲线[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(04): 201-206.
[9] 孙力. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜下全子宫+双输卵管切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 0-0.
[10] 陈珂瑶, 孙力, 李华, 高玉涛, 张旋, 杨萌, 杨文静, 谭化明, 潘玉英. 经阴道自然腔道内镜全子宫切除手术的临床对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 96-102.
[11] 孙力. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜下全子宫+双附件切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 0-0.
[12] 陈博滔, 成伟. 青年外科医师腹腔镜胆道手术学习曲线和成长之路——单中心团队体会[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 143-146.
[13] 朱伟权, 刘东宁, 唐和春, 罗瑞, 何鹏辉, 温祥琼, 唐城, 李太原. 腹部无辅助切口经肛门取标本的机器人高位直肠癌根治术一例报道(CRC-NOSES Ⅳ式)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(02): 201-203.
[14] 卓宪华, 陈俊榕, 卢祎, 孙家琛, 刘亚男, 李初俊. 非放大内镜下结直肠病变的国际NICE分型判断结直肠息肉的应用及学习曲线[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(03): 105-110.
[15] 周烨, 法镇中, 奚剑波, 汤建军, 孙姚承. 腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术的学习曲线[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2020, 06(02): 83-87.
阅读次数
全文


摘要