切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03): 187 -190. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2022.03.013

临床技术

达芬奇机器人经肛门微创手术:治疗直肠良性肿瘤的一种新技术
邹贵军1, 袁新普1, 马冰1, 宋舟1, 黄晓天1, 曹震1, 王麦换1, 张朝军1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科医学部
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-07 出版日期:2022-06-30
  • 通信作者: 张朝军
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81972320)

Da Vinci robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a new technique for excision of rectal benign neoplasia

Guijun Zou1, Xinpu Yuan1, Bing Ma1, Zhou Song1, Xiaotian Huang1, Zhen Cao1, Maihuan Wang1, Chaojun Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2022-03-07 Published:2022-06-30
  • Corresponding author: Chaojun Zhang

应用达芬奇机器人经肛门微创手术(transanal minimally invasive surgery, TaMIS)治疗直肠良性肿瘤越来越受欢迎,但在国内鲜见报道。解放军总医院于2022年1月成功完成了1例达芬奇机器人TaMIS,手术时间约40 min,术中出血约10 ml,术后无并发症。术后病理检查提示直肠管状腺瘤,切缘未见肿瘤。达芬奇机器人手术操作系统有利于TaMIS的开展,迎合保肛保功能的外科手术的发展趋向,发展潜力大。

The da Vinci robot minimally invasive transanal surgery has become a popular technique for rectal benign neoplasia, but is rarely reported in China. In Jan. 2022, the first robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectum polyp was performed in the PLA General Hospital, with the surgical time of approximately 40 min and an amount of blood loss of approximately 10 ml, with no perioperative complications and no postoperative pathological evidence of tumor residue. Da Vinci robotic surgical operating system has the potential to facilitate minimally invasive transanal surgery and meet the trend for anal preservation and functional surgery.

图1 达芬奇机器人经肛门微创手术的手术步骤注:A.标记切除范围;B.肿瘤一侧垂直切开黏膜;C.全层切开黏膜至显露直肠壁外黄色脂肪组织为止;D.全层完整切除病变;E.连续缝合创面;F.创面对合良好
1
Jong GMHugen N. Minimally invasive transanal surgery is safe after incomplete polypectomy of low risk T1 rectal cancer: a systematic review[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2019, 21(10):1112-1119.
2
Kim MJLee TG. Transanal minimally invasive surgery using laparoscopic instruments of the rectum: a review[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, 13(10):1149-1165.
3
Stipa F, Tierno SM, Russo G, et al. Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): a comparative case-control matched-pairs analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 202136, 2081-2086.
4
Witjes CDM, Patel AS, Shenoy A, et al. Oncological outcome after local treatment for early stage rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 202136, 489-497.
5
Serra-Aracil X, Badia-Closa J, Pallisera-Lloveras A, et al. Management of intra- and postoperative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures: a systematic review[J]. Minerva Surg, 2021, 76(4):343-349.
6
Brown CJ, Gentles JQ, Phang TP, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery as day surgery - a single-centre experience with 500 patients[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2018, 20(10):310-315.
7
Young DO, Kumar AS. Local excision of rectal cancer[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2017, 97(3):573-585.
8
Marks JH, Salem JF, Adams P, et al. SP rTaTME: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (SP rTaTME)[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2021, 25(6):721-726.
9
Hompes R, Rauh SM, Ris F, et al. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms[J]. Br J Surg, 2014, 101(5):578-581.
10
Atallah SB, Albert MR, Beche-Adams TH, et al. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery in a cadaveric model[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2011, 15(4):461-464.
11
Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, et al. Robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery: technical details for the lateral approach[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(10):1194-1198.
12
Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Parra-Davila E, et al. Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasia, transanal total mesorectal excision, and repair of complex fistulae: clinical experience with the first 18 cases at a single institution[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2015, 19(7):401-410.
13
Tomassi MJ, Taller J, Yuhan R, et al. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for the excision of rectal neoplasia: clinical experience with 58 consecutive patients[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2019, 62(3):279-285.
14
Harr JN, Obias V. Robotic-assisted transanal excision of a large rectal mass--a video vignette[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2016, 18(1):107-108.
15
Erenler I, Aytac E, Bilgin I A, et al. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) with the da Vinci Xi system - a video vignette[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(4):401.
16
Harr JN, Luka S, Kankaria A, et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in obese patients: a case-matched series[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(7):2813-2819.
17
Arnott S, Skancke MObias V. Robotic transanal microsurgery for high early rectal neoplasia (T0-T1, N0 lesions), case series of 10 patients[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2018, 14(6):1956.
18
Lo KW, Blitzer DN, Shoucair S, et al. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a case series[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(1):793-799.
19
Fields AC, Saadat LV, Scully RE, et al. Local excision versus radical resection for 1- to 2-cm neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum: a national cancer database analysis[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2019, 62(4):417-421.
20
Rai V, Mishra N. Transanal approach to rectal polyps and cancer[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2016, 29(1):65-70.
21
Brady JT, Sprinkle S, Izfar S, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a useful technique that continues to evolve[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2021, 39.
22
Burgess NG, Metz AJ, Williams SJ, et al. Risk factors for intraprocedural and clinically significant delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 12(4):651-661.
23
Huang C, Huang RX, Xiang P, et al. Current research status of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms[J]. Clin Invest Med, 2012, 35(4):158-164.
24
Luigiano C, Consolo P, Scaffidi MG, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up[J]. Endoscopy, 2009, 41(10):829-835.
25
Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(2):343-352.
26
Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, et al. A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(9):775-788.
27
Lee L, Burke JP, Beche-Adams T, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia: outcomes from 200 consecutive cases with midterm follow up[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(5):910-916.
28
Lee L, Edwards K, Hunter IA, et al. Quality of local excision for rectal neoplasms using transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus transanal minimally invasive surgery: a multi-institutional matched analysis[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(9):928-935.
29
Atallah S, BAlbert MR. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): is one better than the other[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(12):4750-4751.
30
O′Neill CH, Platz J, Moore JS, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early rectal cancer: a single-center experience[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(2):152-160.
31
Oshio H, Oshima Y, Yunome G, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision and transabdominal robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective study[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2021, 70:102902.
32
Schatte Olivier RH, Van′t Hullenaar CD, Ruurda JP, et al. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(6):1365-1371.
33
Tarr ME, Brancato SJ, Cunkelman JA, et al. Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(2):234-238.
34
Kajmolli A, Felsenreich DM, Javadov M, et al. Robotic tamis: a technical note comparing Si(r) versus Xi(r)[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2021, 38:169-172.
35
Gomez PP, Willis R EVan, Sickle KR. Development of a virtual reality robotic surgical curriculum using the da vinci si surgical system[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(8):2171-2179.
[1] 蔡建鹏, 陈伟, 陈流华, 李仕进, 殷晓煜. 达芬奇机器人在胆总管囊肿手术切除中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 194-197.
[2] 张荣杰, 孙龙, 杨世伟, 孙伟, 刘平, 胡春芳, 刘建龙, 郝迎学. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助下腔静脉滤器取出术的临床疗效[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(05): 292-297.
[3] 查立超, 邱法波, 韩冰, 何向阳. 达芬奇机器人与开腹手术治疗原发性腹膜后肿瘤的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(06): 367-369.
[4] 李小磊, 朱见, 王梦迪, 庄大勇, 郑鲁明, 周鹏, 岳涛, 贺青卿. 达芬奇机器人治疗肿瘤直径大于2 cm甲状腺癌的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(04): 216-219.
[5] 黄运兰, 袁勇, 李冬青, 刘丽颖. 达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈残端癌的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(02): 113-116.
[6] 齐金红, 袁勇, 冯文娟, 孙巍, 刘丽颖, 扈永乐. 达芬奇机器人行妇科手术151例临床分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(06): 370-375.
[7] 刘金钰, 张锌, 高春英, 朴金霞. 达芬奇机器人系统在宫颈癌根治术中的应用(附40例报告)[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(02): 93-96.
[8] 鞠后琼, 刘东宁, 仲崇晗, 何鹏辉, 叶善平, 王大强, 李太原. 机器人腹部无辅助切口经直肠取出标本的右半结肠合并中位直肠癌根治术(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 172-176.
[9] 王大强, 朱伟群, 刘东宁, 仲崇晗, 鞠后琼, 李太原. 体外离断直肠在NOSES Ⅰ式低位直肠癌根治术中的应用(附六例报告)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 86-88.
[10] 吴宏宇, 汤庆超, 金英虎, 胡志乔, 王贵玉. 机器人腹部无辅助切口经直肠拖出标本的高位直肠癌根治术(NOSES-IV式)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 645-648.
[11] 吴宏宇, 黄睿, 胡汉卿, 管子龙, 王贵玉. 机器人腹部无辅助切口经直肠拉出切除标本的中位直肠癌根治术(NOSES-Ⅱ式)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 429-432.
[12] 朱伟权, 刘东宁, 唐和春, 罗瑞, 何鹏辉, 温祥琼, 唐城, 李太原. 腹部无辅助切口经肛门取标本的机器人高位直肠癌根治术一例报道(CRC-NOSES Ⅳ式)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(02): 201-203.
[13] 黄彬, 叶景旺, 田跃, 童卫东. 达芬奇机器人经肛门微创直肠肿瘤切除[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(06): 638-640.
[14] 黄佳, 李函玥, 李重武, 林皓, 陆佩吉, 李剑涛, 罗清泉. 连续389例达芬奇机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌经验总结[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2017, 04(04): 199-203.
[15] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 陈南征, 贺海奇, 李硕, 马磊, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达芬奇机器人食管裂孔疝修补术临床疗效分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2020, 07(02): 71-76.
阅读次数
全文


摘要