切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 216 -219. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.04.007

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

达芬奇机器人治疗肿瘤直径大于2 cm甲状腺癌的临床研究
李小磊1, 朱见1, 王梦迪1, 庄大勇1, 郑鲁明1, 周鹏1, 岳涛1, 贺青卿1,()   
  1. 1. 250031 济南军区总医院甲状腺乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-09 出版日期:2018-08-30
  • 通信作者: 贺青卿
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81702448); 济南军区总医院院长基金资助项目(2016ZD02,2017MS04)

Clinical study of da Vinci robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer larger than 2 cm

Xiaolei Li1, Jian Zhu1, Mengdi Wang1, Dayong Zhuang1, Luming Zheng1, Peng Zhou1, Tao Yue1, Qingqing He1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Jinan Military General Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Jinan 250031, China
  • Received:2018-06-09 Published:2018-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Qingqing He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Qingqing, Email:
引用本文:

李小磊, 朱见, 王梦迪, 庄大勇, 郑鲁明, 周鹏, 岳涛, 贺青卿. 达芬奇机器人治疗肿瘤直径大于2 cm甲状腺癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(04): 216-219.

Xiaolei Li, Jian Zhu, Mengdi Wang, Dayong Zhuang, Luming Zheng, Peng Zhou, Tao Yue, Qingqing He. Clinical study of da Vinci robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer larger than 2 cm[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 11(04): 216-219.

目的

与开放手术相比较,评估经腋乳径路达芬奇机器人甲状腺手术治疗肿瘤直径大于2 cm甲状腺癌的手术安全性和肿瘤彻底性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年1月在济南军区总医院通过开放手术或机器人手术治疗肿瘤直径2~4 cm的甲状腺乳头状癌患者的临床资料。

结果

本研究包括行机器人甲状腺切除手术患者30例,行开放手术患者45例。机器人手术组与开放手术组的肿瘤直径均在2~4 cm,两组患者均行甲状腺全切及颈部淋巴结清扫术,机器人手术组均顺利完成,无中转开放手术。机器人手术组平均年龄为(36.18 ± 3.5)岁,开放组平均年龄为(45.90 ± 2.2)岁。机器人组平均手术时间为(146.2 ± 30.5) min,显著长于开放组手术时间(95.9 ± 26.2) min (P< 0.001)。两组均未发生永久性喉返神经损伤和甲状旁腺功能减退,两组在术后短暂性喉返神经损伤发生率和甲状旁腺功能减退发生率、术后引流量、住院时间、清扫淋巴结数目比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。术后美容效果数字评分系统得分,机器人手术组(9.4 ± 0.4)分,显著优于开放组的(5.2 ± 1.2)分(P< 0.05)。

结论

与开放手术相比,对肿瘤直径2~4 cm的甲状腺乳头状癌患者行机器人甲状腺手术可以保证手术安全性和肿瘤切除的彻底性,并且具有更好的美容效果,适合于在意颈部瘢痕的患者。

Objective

To evaluate the surgical safety and oncological completeness of da vinci robotic thyroidectomy via bilateral axillo-breast approach for thyroid carcinoma larger than 2 cm by comparing with conventional open thyroidectomy.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with papillary thyroid cancer measuring 2-4 cm underwent robotic thyroidectomy or open thyroidectomy were collected and reviewed.

Results

This study included 30 patients received robotic thyroidectomy and 45 patients underwent open thyroidectomy. All the patient underwent total thyroidectomy and neck lymph node dissection. The cases in robotic thyroidectomy group were completed successfully, and no conversion to open surgery. The mean ages were (36.18 ± 3.5)years and (45.90 ± 2.2)years in robotic thyroidectomy group and open thyroidectomy group, respectively. The operation time of the robotic group was (146.2 ± 30.5) minutes, which was much longer than that of open group(95.9 ± 26.2) minutes (P< 0.001). There were no permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypoparathyroidism in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury rate, transient hypoparathyroidism rate, volume of drainage, the number of retrieved lymph nodes, hospital stay (P> 0.05). The postoperative cosmetic scores were much higher in the robotic group (9.4 ± 0.4) than the open group (5.2 ± 1.2) (P< 0.05).

Conclusions

The robotic total thyroidectomy and neck lymph node dissection has a similar surgical safety and oncological completeness with open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinomas with tumor size of 2-4 cm, and has excellent cosmetic results, suits for patients caring about the neck scars.

表1 甲状腺癌患者的两组临床特征比较
表2 甲状腺癌患者的两组手术情况及并发症比较
1
田文,郗洪庆,王冰. 重视甲状腺癌术后规范化长期随访[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(9):937-940.
2
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017[J]. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2017,67(1):7-30.
3
He QQ, Zhu J, Zhuang DY, et al. Comparative study between robotic total thyroidectomy with central lymph node dissection via bilateral axillo-breast approach and conventional open procedure for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. Chin Med J (Engl),2016,129(18):2160-2166.
4
Tae K, Song CM, Ji YB, et al. Comparison of surgical completeness between robotic total thyroidectomy versus open thyroidectomy[J]. Laryngoscope,2014,124(4):1042-1047.
5
贺青卿. 规范达芬奇机器人外科手术系统在甲状腺手术中的应用[J]. 中华外科杂志,2017,55(8):570-573.
6
Tae K, Song CM, Ji YB, et al. Oncologic outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy: 5-year experience with propensity score matching[J]. Surg Endosc,2016,30(11):4785-4792.
7
Lee KE, Kim E, Koo do H, et al. Robotic thyroidectomy by bilateral axillo-breast approach: review of 1 026 cases and surgical completeness[J]. Surg Endosc,2013,27(8):2955-2962.
8
贺青卿,朱见,范子义,等. 达芬奇机器人腋乳径路与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺微小癌的对照研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2016, 54(1):51-55.
9
王猛,郑鲁明,于芳,等. 达芬奇机器人手术治疗甲状腺微小癌150例临床分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(5):540-542.
10
Ban EJ, Yoo JY, Kim WW, et al. Surgical complications after robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a single center experience with 3000 patients[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28(9):2555-2563.
11
Pan JH, Zhou H, Zhao XX, et al. Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques, 2017, 31(1):1-17.
12
Lang BH, Wong CK, Tsang JS, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgically-related complications between robotic-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2014,21(3):850-861.
13
尹乐乐,范子义,于芳,等. 达芬奇机器人甲状腺手术中甲状旁腺的损伤因素及保护[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(5):262-267.
14
Ito Y, Fukushima M, Higashiyama T, et al. Tumor size is the strongest predictor of microscopic lymph node metastasis and lymph node recurrence of N0 papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Endocr J,2013,60(1):113-117.
15
贺青卿,朱见,范子义, 等. 达芬奇机器人行甲状腺癌颈侧区清扫的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2016,9(4):212-216.
16
Seup KB, Kang KH, Park SJ. Robotic modified radical neck dissection by bilateral axillary breast approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck metastasis[J]. Head & Neck, 2015, 37(1):37-45.
17
许双塔. 腔镜甲状腺手术现状与展望[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2016,9(2):80-82.
18
Lee MC, Park H, Lee BC, et al. Comparison of quality of life between open and endoscopic thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer[J]. Head Neck,2016,38(1):827-831.
[1] 孙帼, 谢迎东, 徐超丽, 杨斌. 超声联合临床特征的列线图模型预测甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 734-742.
[2] 王伟伟, 费建平, 王璋瑜. 不同手术空间建立方法的经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 84-87.
[3] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[4] 王宇, 徐芳泉, 周旋, 姚晓峰, 李强. 不断提高分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-476.
[5] 何羽. 腔镜微创手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-458.
[6] 宋红霞, 吴玩呈. 内镜下甲状腺手术切口入路发展的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 470-472.
[7] 游涛建, 任林, 马宇. cT1-2N0期PTMC经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术后引流与否的可行性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 311-314.
[8] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. “RLN三角”在经腋窝入路腔镜甲状腺切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 307-310.
[9] 刘晓菊, 姚芮, 杜镇鸿, 李文忠. 经胸壁入路与低位小切口在甲状腺良性肿瘤切除术中的疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 204-207.
[10] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[11] 黄崇植, 肖映胜, 杨熙鸿, 林炘. 甲状腺下动脉的上行分支在甲状腺术中定位喉返神经的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 607-610.
[12] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[13] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[14] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[15] 杨菲, 刘腾飞, 赵志军, 李睿聪, 张颉, 刘妍, 赵珍. 血清维生素水平与分化型甲状腺癌的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 633-640.
阅读次数
全文


摘要