切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06): 370 -375. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.06.013

所属专题: 经典病例 机器人手术 文献资源库

论著 上一篇    下一篇

达芬奇机器人行妇科手术151例临床分析
齐金红 1, 袁勇 1 , ( ), 冯文娟 1, 孙巍 1, 刘丽颖 1, 扈永乐 1   
  1. 1. 130012 长春,吉林省肿瘤医院妇瘤二科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-07 出版日期:2017-12-30
  • 通信作者: 袁勇

Clinical analysis of 151 cases of gynecological operation of DaVinci robotic

Jinhong Qi 1, Yong Yuan 1 , ( ), Wenjuan Feng 1, Wei Sun 1, Liying Liu 1, Yongle Hu 1   

  1. 1. Department Two of Gynecologic Oncology, Jilin Province Tumor Hospital, Changchun 130012 , China
  • Received:2017-09-07 Published:2017-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Yong Yuan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yuan Yong, Email:
目的

探讨达芬奇机器人手术系统行妇科手术的安全性、可行性及临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性总结吉林省肿瘤医院于2014年10月至2017年2月实施的151例妇科手术临床资料及治疗效果。

结果

151例手术均顺利完成,无中转开腹及更改术式。其中56例全子宫切除、29例宫颈癌、19例子宫内膜癌、18例子宫肌瘤剔除术、18例卵巢瘤核出术、4例乳腺癌去势、2例卵巢瘤单侧附件切除、1例卵巢癌、1例阴道癌、1例子宫次全切除、1例子宫肌瘤+卵巢瘤核出、1例子宫肌瘤剔除+腹膜后肿物切除。手术时间38~280 min,平均(156.9 ± 119.6)min;术中出血量0~120 ml,平均(64.9 ± 53.7)ml;术后肠道功能恢复时间7~54 h,平均(31.4 ± 22.7)h;膀胱功能恢复时间13~356 h,平均(192.7 ± 178.6)h;切除淋巴结15~44枚,平均(28.4±12.7)枚;住院时间89~648 h,平均(196.2 ± 73.4)h。

结论

达芬奇机器人外科手术系统应用于妇科手术安全可行,尤其是在恶性肿瘤手术优势明显,患者出血少、创伤小、恢复快、安全性高,具有临床应用价值。

Objective

To explore the safety, feasibility and clinical value of gynecological surgery in Da Vinci robot system.

Methods

Retrospective summary of Jilin Provincial Tumor Hospital in Oct.2014 to Feb. 2017 implementation of 151 cases of gynecological surgery clinical data and treatment.

Results

151 patients were successfully completed surgery, no transfer to open and change the operation. 56 cases of hysterectomy, 29 cases of cervical cancer, 19 cases of endometrial cancer, 18 cases of uterine leiomyoma, 18 cases of ovarian tumor, 4 cases of breast cancer castration, 2 cases of unilateral appendiceal ovarian resection, 1 case of ovarian cancer, 1 case of vaginal cancer, 1 case of uterine total resection, 1 case of uterine fibroids + ovarian tumor nucleus, 1 case of uterine fibroids removed + retroperitoneal tumor resection. The operation time ranged from 38 - 280 min, the average (156.9 ± 119.6) min; intraoperative blood loss was 0 -120 ml, the average (64.9 ± 53.7) ml; postoperative intestinal function recovery time was 7-54 h, the average (31.4 ± 22.7) h; bladder function recovery time of 13-356 h, average (192.7±178.6) h; lymph node resection from 15 - 44, the average (28.4 ±12.7); hospitalization time was 89-648 h, the average (196.2 ± 73.4) h.

Conclusions

Da Vinci robotic surgical operating system is safe and feasible for gynecological surgery, especially in the obvious advantages of malignant tumors, patients with less bleeding, less trauma, quick recovery, high safety, with clinical value.

1
刘忠宇,李秀丽,李卫平,等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统在妇科肿瘤的临床应用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 7(6): 52-55.
2
丁晓萍,刘蕊,刘媛媛,达芬奇机器人辅助卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿手术8例临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2010, 11(6) : 447- 448.
3
Diaz- Arrastie C, Jumalov C, Gomez G, et al.Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer- enhanced surgical robot[J].Surg Endose, 2002, 16(9) : 1271-1273.
4
Payne TN, Dauterive L. A comparison of total laparoscop-ic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice[J].J Minim In vasive Gynecol, 2008, 15(3): 286-291.
5
Vlaovic PD, Sargent ER, Boker JR, et al. Immediate impact of an intensive one week laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists[J].JSLS, 2008, 12(1) : 1-8.
6
丁玉兰,赵卫东. 机器人手术在妇科恶性肿瘤手术治疗中的应用[J].国际妇产科学杂志,2011, 2(38): 56-59.
7
Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. the future is now[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics & Computer Assisted Surgery, 2007, 3(3): 224-228.
8
Ngo C, Cornou C, Rossi L, et al. Evidence for the use of robotically assisted surgery in gynaecologic cancers[J]. Current Opinion in Oncology, 2016, 28(5): 398-403.
9
Minig L, Zanagnolo V, Cárdenas-Rebollo JM, et al. Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced cervical cancer[J]. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 42(9): 1372-1377.
10
Corrado G, Cutillo G, Pomati G, et al. Surgical and oncological utcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominalsurgery in the management of endometrial cancer[J].Eur J urg Oncol,2015, 41(8) : 1074-1081.
11
叶明侠,俞凌,范文生,等. 机器人系统在早期卵巢癌治疗的临床应用分析[J]. 中华医学杂志,2017, 97(13): 982-985.
12
Johansen G, Lonnerfors C, Falconer H, et al.Reproductive and oncologic outcome following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2016,141(1): 160-165.
13
Querleu D, Leblanc E. Laparoscopic infrarenal paraaortic lymph node dissection for restaging of carcinoma of the ovary or fallopian tube[J]. Cancer, 1994 ,73 (5): 1467-1471.
14
朱晓艳,王海琳.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术在妇科领域中的应用进展[J].现代妇产科进展,2012,10(21): 802-804.
15
孙小单,袁勇. 机器人及传统腹腔镜全子宫切除术的临床比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2015,8(2): 18-21.
16
Shemer J. Laparascopic surgery and robotic-guided surgery[J].Harefuah,2009,148(3): 169-170, 210.
17
Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Noble BN, et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,201(6): 566-567.
[1] 蔡建鹏, 陈伟, 陈流华, 李仕进, 殷晓煜. 达芬奇机器人在胆总管囊肿手术切除中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 194-197.
[2] 杨学文, 孙力, 肖书傲, 李孟彬. 妇科手术联合腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后疝复发的危险因素分析及预防要点[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 23-26.
[3] 徐美芳, 万丽琴, 卢斌. 妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预对患者恢复状况与生活能力的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 383-386.
[4] 张荣杰, 孙龙, 杨世伟, 孙伟, 刘平, 胡春芳, 刘建龙, 郝迎学. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助下腔静脉滤器取出术的临床疗效[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(05): 292-297.
[5] 丁伟, 王敏, 曾志, 闫效宇. 悬吊免气腹经脐单孔腹腔镜在妇产科疾病应用进展[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(03): 189-192.
[6] 顾成磊, 范文生, 杨雯, 王敏, 张妮娜, 李震, 孟元光. 机器人单孔腹腔镜妇科手术11例临床观察[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(04): 212-215.
[7] 李小磊, 朱见, 王梦迪, 庄大勇, 郑鲁明, 周鹏, 岳涛, 贺青卿. 达芬奇机器人治疗肿瘤直径大于2 cm甲状腺癌的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(04): 216-219.
[8] 冯云, 闫雪兰, 董薇, 许鸿霞, 张粉, 朱彩芬, 赵晗, 刘靖, 黄慧娟. 常规器械单孔腹腔镜妇科和外科疾病联合手术46例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(03): 162-165.
[9] 冷明月, 刘义玲, 刘霞, 孙大为. 妇科NOTES手术与普通腹腔镜手术围手术期护理对比与效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(03): 183-185.
[10] 王丹莹, 刘海元, 史宏晖, 樊庆泊, 孙大为, 郎景和. 术中超声在妇产科手术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(02): 118-121.
[11] 吴宏宇, 汤庆超, 金英虎, 胡志乔, 王贵玉. 机器人腹部无辅助切口经直肠拖出标本的高位直肠癌根治术(NOSES-IV式)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 645-648.
[12] 吴宏宇, 黄睿, 胡汉卿, 管子龙, 王贵玉. 机器人腹部无辅助切口经直肠拉出切除标本的中位直肠癌根治术(NOSES-Ⅱ式)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 429-432.
[13] 朱伟权, 刘东宁, 唐和春, 罗瑞, 何鹏辉, 温祥琼, 唐城, 李太原. 腹部无辅助切口经肛门取标本的机器人高位直肠癌根治术一例报道(CRC-NOSES Ⅳ式)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(02): 201-203.
[14] 黄佳, 李函玥, 李重武, 林皓, 陆佩吉, 李剑涛, 罗清泉. 连续389例达芬奇机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌经验总结[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2017, 04(04): 199-203.
[15] 许世广, 刘星池, 王希龙, 刘博, 王述民. 应用达芬奇机器人手术系统肺切除技术总结[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2016, 03(02): 77-82.
阅读次数
全文


摘要