切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05): 292 -297. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2019.05.009

所属专题： 机器人手术； 文献资源库；

论著 上一篇    下一篇

达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助下腔静脉滤器取出术的临床疗效
张荣杰 1, 孙龙 1, 杨世伟 1, 孙伟 1, 刘平 1, 胡春芳 1, 刘建龙 2, 郝迎学 1 , †( )   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆，陆军军医大学西南医院血管外科
    2. 100035 北京积水潭医院血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-04 出版日期:2019-10-30
  • 通信作者: 郝迎学
  • 基金资助:
    陆军军医大学临床医学科研人才培养计划(2018XLC3015); 陆军军医大学第一附属医院创新团队培养计划(SWH2018TD-03)

Clinical efficacy of Da Vinci robotic surgical system assisted inferior vena cava filter retrieval

Rongjie Zhang 1, Long Sun 1, Shiwei Yang 1, Wei Sun 1, Ping Liu 1, Chunfang Hu 1, Jianlong Liu 2, Yingxue Hao 1 , †( )   

  1. 1. Department of Uascular Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
    2. Vascular Surgery of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2019-09-04 Published:2019-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Yingxue Hao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hao Yingxue, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( )
目的

达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助下下腔静脉滤器取出术的临床疗效。

方法

采用回顾性描述性研究方法，收集2019年7月陆军军医大学西南医院血管外科收治的亚洲首例行达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助下下腔静脉滤器取出术患者的临床资料。患者下腔静脉滤器置入术后2个月余，血管腔内技术无法取出下腔静脉中的滤器，在达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助下取出下腔静脉滤器。观察指标：术中及术后情况；随访及生存情况。采用门诊进行随访，了解患者术后生存情况。随访时间截至2019年8月。

结果

患者成功行达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助下下腔静脉滤器取出术。手术时间326 min，术中出血量100 ml，完成下腔静脉滤器取出术后，下腔静脉切口吻合良好，无出血及狭窄，无术中并发症发生。患者术后住院时间3 d。随访及生存情况：患者术后随访1个月，腹部穿刺套管孔愈合良好，患者生存良好。

结论

达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助下下腔静脉滤器取出术安全可行。

关键词: 达芬奇机器人手术系统, 下腔静脉, 下腔静脉滤器, 微创手术
Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of Da Vinci robotic surgical system assisted Inferior Vena Cava filter retrieval.

Methods

The retrospective descriptive study was conducted.The clinical data of the first patient in asia who underwent Da Vinci robotic surgical system assisted inferior vena cava filter retrieval in the department of vascular surgery of Southwest Hospital of Army Military Medical University in Jul. 2019 were collected. The patient underwent retrievable inferior vena cava filter implantation two months ago, and failed to removal of inferior vena cava filters by endovascular measures and underwent inferior vena cava filter retrieval assisted by Da Vinci robotic surgical system. Observation indicators: intra-and post-operative situations; follow-up and patients’ survival. Follow-up using outpatient examination to detect the patients’ postoperative survival and swelling reduction of affected extremity up to Aug.2019.

Results

Intra- and post-operative situations: patient underwent inferior vena cava filter retrieval using Da Vinci robotic surgical system successfully. Operation time was 326 minutes and estimated blood loss was 100 ml. After removal of inferior vena cava filter, the incision of inferior vena cava was anastomosed well without bleeding or stenosis. No intraoperative complications occurred. Duration of hospital stay after surgery was 3 days.Follow-up and patients’ survival: patient was followed up for 1 month.The patient had a good survive without any complications.

Conclusions

The Da Vinci robotic surgical system is safe and feasible in inferior vena cava filter retrieval.

Key words: Da Vinci robotic surgical system, Inferior vena cava, Inferior vena cava filter, Minimally invasive surgery
图1 术中置入下腔静脉滤器
图2 穿刺套管布局、机械臂摆位、取出下腔静脉滤器
图3 手术步骤示意
1
Tagalakis V, Patenaude V, Kahn SR，et al. Incidence of and mortality from venous thromboembolism in a real-world population: the q-vte study cohort[J]. Am J Med, 2013，126(9): 13-21.
2
Tritschler T, Kraaijpoel N, Le Gal G, et al. Venous thromboembolism: advances in diagnosis and treatment[J]. JAMA, 2018，320(15): 1583-1594.
6
Ha CP, Rectenwald JE. Inferior vena cava filters: current indications, techniques, and recommendations[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2018，98(2): 293-319.
7
Desai KR, Pandhi MB, Seedial SM, et al. Retrievable ivc filters: comprehensive review of device-related complications and advanced retrieval techniques[J]．radiographics, 2017，37(4): 1236-1245.
8
DeSai C, Lamus D, Kumar G. Arteriovenous fistula-a rare complication of ivc filter retrieval[J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2019，53(6): 501-506.
9
Lee JK, So YH, Choi YH, et al. Clinical course and predictive factors for complication of inferior vena cava filters[J]. Thromb Res, 2014，133(4): 538-543.
10
Angel LF, Tapson V, Galgon RE, et al. Systematic review of the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011，22(11): 1522-1533.
11
Jia Z, Fuller TA, McKinney JM, et al. Utility of retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a systematic literature review and analysis of the reasons for nonretrieval of filters with temporary indications[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2018，41(5): 675-682.
12
Reed NR, Gloviczki P, Stockland AH, et al. Open surgical removal of a tilted and dislodged inferior vena cava filter through a lumbar branch without cavotomy[J]. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2013，1(3): 304-308.
13
Benrashid E, Adkar SS, Bennett KM, et al. Total laparoscopic retrieval of inferior vena cava filter[J]. SAGE Open Med Case Rep, 2015，3: 2050313X15597356. DOI: 10.1177/2050313X15597356.
14
Wang HD, Liu JL, Jia W, et al. Laparoscopic retrieval of a tilted inferior vena cava filter[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2018，131(7): 875-876.
15
Zhang H, Niu L, Zhang F, et al. Complete laparoscopic retrieval of inferior vena cava filter: a case report and literature review[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2019，57(276): 9-13.
16
Davila VJ, Velazco CS, Stone WM, et al. Robotic inferior vena cava surgery[J]. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2017，5(2): 194-199.
17
Mazzolai L, Aboyans V, Ageno W, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis: a joint consensus document from the european society of cardiology working groups of aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018，39(47): 4208-4218.
18
Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for vte disease: chest guideline and expert panel report[J]. Chest, 2016，149(2): 315-352.
19
李晓强，张福先，王深明. 深静脉血栓形成的诊断和治疗指南(第三版)[J/CD]．中国血管外科杂志(电子版)，2017，9(4): 250-257.
20
Al-Hakim R, Kee ST, Olinger K, et al. Inferior vena cava filter retrieval: effectiveness and complications of routine and advanced techniques[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2014，25(6): 933-939.
21
中华医学会放射学分会介入学. 下腔静脉滤器置入术和取出术规范的专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志，2011, 45(3): 340-344.
22
Kuyumcu G, Walker TG. Inferior vena cava filter retrievals, standard and novel techniques[J]. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2016，6(6): 642-650.
23
Zhou D, Spain J, Moon E，et al. Retrospective review of 120 celect inferior vena cava filter retrievals: experience at a single institution[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2012，23(12): 1557-1563.
24
Marquess JS, Burke CT, Beecham AH, et al. Factors associated with failed retrieval of the günther tulip inferior vena cava filter[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2008，19(9): 1321-1327.
25
Durack JC, Westphalen AC, Kekulawela S, et al. Perforation of the ivc: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the günther tulip and celect retrievable filters[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2012，35(2): 299-308.
26
Rubenstein L, Chun AK, Chew M, et al. Loop-snare technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrievals[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2007，18(10): 1315-1318.
27
Lynch FC. Balloon-assisted removal of tilted inferior vena cava filters with embedded tips[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2009，20(9): 1210-1214.
28
Iliescu B, Haskal ZJ. Advanced techniques for removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2012，35(4): 741-750.
29
Kuo WT, Cupp JS, Louie JD, et al. Complex retrieval of embedded ivc filters: alternative techniques and histologic tissue analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2012，35(3): 588-597.
30
Yamagami T, Kato T, Nishimura T. Successful retrieval of a gunther tulip vena cava filter with the assistance of a curved sheath introducer[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005，16(12): 1760-1762.
31
Stavropoulos SW, Solomon JA, Trerotola SO. Wall-embedded recovery inferior vena cava filters: imaging features and technique for removal[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006，17(2): 379-382.
32
White SB, Stavropoulos SW. Retrieval of a wall-embedded recovery inferior vena cava filter using rigid bronchoscopy forceps[J]. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2007，24(1): 15-19.
33
Stavropoulos SW, Dixon RG, Burke CT, et al. Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: use of endobronchial forceps[J]．J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2008，19(9): 1297-1301.
34
Kuo WT, Tong RT, Hwang GL, et al. High-risk retrieval of adherent and chronically implanted ivc filters: techniques for removal and management of thrombotic complications[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2009，20(12): 1548-1556.
35
Malgor RD, Labropoulos N. A systematic review of symptomatic duodenal perforation by inferior vena cava filters[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2012，55(3): 856-861.
36
Goldman KA, Adelman MA. Retroperitoneal caval filter as a source of abdominal pain[J]. Cardiovasc Surg, 1994，2(1): 85-87.
37
Rana MA, Gloviczki P, Kalra M, et al. Open surgical removal of retained and dislodged inferior vena cava filters[J]. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2015，3(2): 201-206.
38
Connolly PH, Balachandran VP, Trost D, et al. Open surgical inferior vena cava filter retrieval for caval perforation and a novel technique for minimal cavotomy filter extraction[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2012，56(1): 256-259.
39
Wang B, Huang Q, Liu K, et al. Robot-assisted level iii-iv inferior vena cava thrombectomy: initial series with step-by-step procedures and 1-yr outcomes[J]. Eur Urol, 2019.DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.019.
40
Sun Y, Castro Abreu AL, Gill IS. Robotic inferior vena cava thrombus surgery: novel strategies[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2014，24(2): 140-147.
41
张荣杰，孙龙，杨世伟，等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助髂股静脉旁路移植术的临床疗效[J]．中华消化外科杂志，2019，18(4): 380-386.
[1] 崔红丽, 吴雅峰, 李雁平. 超声心动图对妊娠中晚期下腔静脉压迫综合征的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2020, 17(09): 880-884.
[2] 张耀, 高峥嵘, 张强, 赵昌松, 陈佳敏, 赵汝岗, 马睿. 微创手术治疗18例布鲁菌病髋关节炎合并早期股骨头坏死的疗效[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 281-287.
[3] 丁相元, 任效瑛, 闫慧明. 微创胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌围手术期和近远期疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 313-320.
[4] 玉苏甫卡迪尔·麦麦提尼加提, 冉博, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 温浩. 自体肝移植术中肝后段下腔静脉切除不重建方式的应用及临床效果[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 30-32.
[5] 梁睿, 邱峰, 魏雪栋, 黄玉华, 侯建全. 左肾肿瘤、双下腔静脉伴双子宫一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 159-160.
[6] 延敏博, 楚溪, 黄书畅, 郭振宇, 汤育新, 戴英波. 双镜联合治疗下腔静脉后输尿管并右肾结石二例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 469-472.
[7] 朱可安, 陈灵, 李昭, 黄薇. 应用单孔腹腔镜开展常见妇科手术的可行性探讨[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 158-162.
[8] 胡志豪, 李瑞欣, 王国俊. 食管胃结合部腺癌的微创外科治疗现状与展望[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 181-186.
[9] 朱中飞, 何天霖. 达芬奇机器人脾动脉瘤切除重建一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 112-115.
[10] 胡俊熙, 陈良亮, 束余声. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在胸外科的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(01): 61-64.
[11] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会NOTES专委会. 经自然腔道内镜手术（NOTES）专家共识[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 337-342.
[12] 吴宏宇, 汤庆超, 金英虎, 胡志乔, 王贵玉. 机器人腹部无辅助切口经直肠拖出标本的高位直肠癌根治术（NOSES-IV式）（附视频）[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 645-648.
[13] 周军, 赵月明, 宋常华, 赵志明, 仲伟明, 邓昌武, 张聿民, 李树志. 神经内镜手术治疗自发性幕上中等程度脑出血的临床效果[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 51-55.
[14] 王述民. 机器人手术十年体会[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 1-5.
[15] 冷雪峰, 郭旭峰, 戴亮, 侯广杰, 大幸宏幸, 韩泳涛. 日本国立癌症中心食管外科访学浅谈及启示[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 63-69.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号