切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 376 -380. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.06.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

加速康复理念在单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术的应用
任占良1,(), 张泳1, 任小朋1, 张卫峰1, 韩英杰1   
  1. 1. 712000 咸阳,陕西中医药大学附属医院胸心外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-19 出版日期:2017-12-30
  • 通信作者: 任占良

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in single port thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer

Zhanliang Ren1,(), Yong Zhang1, Xiaopeng Ren1, Weifeng Zhang1, Yingjie Han1   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712000, China
  • Received:2017-10-19 Published:2017-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Zhanliang Ren
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ren Zhanliang, Email:
引用本文:

任占良, 张泳, 任小朋, 张卫峰, 韩英杰. 加速康复理念在单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(06): 376-380.

Zhanliang Ren, Yong Zhang, Xiaopeng Ren, Weifeng Zhang, Yingjie Han. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in single port thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(06): 376-380.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS)理念在单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术围手术期的临床疗效。

方法

选择2015年2月至2017年5月陕西中医药大学附属医院胸心外科收治的肺癌患者48例,手术方式均为单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术,患者依据围手术期处理方式不同分为对照组27例、ERAS组21例。分析比较两组的术后疼痛评分、手术时间、术中补液量、胸管拔除时间、住院时间、炎症指标、D-二聚体检测、术后并发症等。

结果

ERAS组的术后24、36、72 h疼痛视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)分别为(3.22±0.97)分、(3.08±0.71)分、(3.93±0.67)分,明显低于对照组的(4.96±0.75)分、(5.15±0.46)分、(5.41±0.25)分,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.01);术中ERAS组限制性补液,液体输入量明显少于对照组,术后胸管拔除时间、住院时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组的手术时间比较无差异。ERAS组的术后1、4 d白细胞计数和CRP水平均低于对照组,ERAS组的术后D-二聚体低于对照组(P< 0.05)。ERAS组并发症总发生率为14.29%,明显低于对照组并发症总发生率48.15%,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。

结论

单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术围术期应用ERAS理念作为指导,处理方式的改变和优化,减少并发症,加快术后康复。

Objective

To explore the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in single hole assisted thoracoscopic lung cancer radical surgery clinical perioperative period.

Methods

From Feb. 2015 to May 2017 the Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine department of thoracic surgery treated 48 cases of patients with lung cancer, surgery for hole thoracoscopic lung resection on the basis of perioperative treatment, were divided into control group of 27 cases and 21 cases in ERAS group. The two groups were analyzed and compared the postoperative pain score, operative time, intraoperative fluid volume, chest tube removal time, hospitalization time, inflammation index, D-two poly detection, postoperative complications.

Results

After the operation of group ERAS 24 h, 36 h , 72 h, VAS pain score (3.22 ±0.97), (3.08 ±0.71), (3.93±0.67) was significantly lower than the control group (4.96±0.75), (5.15±0.46), (5.41±0.25), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01) ERAS; group limited fluid resuscitation during operation, the liquid input is significantly less than the control group, postoperative extubation time, hospitalization time is shorter than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); there is no difference between the two groups in operation time. Day 1, 4 ERAS group of white blood cell count and CRP levels after operation were lower than the control group, ERAS group after two D- dimer was lower than that of control group (P<0.05) in.ERAS group. The total incidence rate was 14.29%, significantly lower than the control group the overall complication rate of 48.15%, there are differences (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The perioperative application the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery as a guide hole thoracoscopic lung cancer radical change, and optimize the processing mode, reduce the complications and accelerate the rehabilitation after operation.

表1 胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的两组临床一般资料比较
表2 胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的两组术后视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分比较(分,±s)
表3 胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的两组临床指标比较(±s)
表4 胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的两组术后白细胞计数比较(±s, ×109/L)
表5 胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的两组术后炎性指标C-反应蛋白比较(±s, mg/L)
表6 胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的两组D-二聚体比较(±s, mg/L)
表7 胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的两组术后并发症比较[例(%)]
1
Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome[J]. Am J Surg,2002, 183(6): 630-641.
2
江志伟,黎介寿.快速康复外科-优化的临床路径[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(1): 12-13.
3
Jiang Z, Li J. Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery in China[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2016,19(3): 246-249.
4
张千益,曲艳,赵颖.全胸腔镜肺叶切除术与传统开胸手术治疗非小细胞肺癌患者疗效对比[J].中国伤残医学,2016,24(5): 49-50.
5
刘新国,鄂勇.全胸腔镜下与开胸肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌疗效对比观察[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30(8): 1163-1165.
6
周渝斌,刘伦旭,喻鹏铭,等.胸腔镜肺叶切除术后心肺功能的快速康复[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2013,20(2): 168-171.
7
Williamsson C, Karlsson N, Sturesson C, et al.Impact of a fast-track surgery programme for pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].Brit J Surgery,2015,102(9): 1133-1141.
8
张瑞杰,蔡奕欣,张霓,等.3cm单孔胸腔镜在解剖性肺段切除术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(1): 52-56.
9
邵丰,刘政呈,潘宴青,等. 单孔胸腔镜气管及支气管成形术治疗气管及支气管病变[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2017,10(3): 177-178.
10
鲍珊,苏建华,廖虎,等.肺癌合并慢性阻塞性肺病和手术方式对患者术后快速康复及治疗费用的影响[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2014,21(1): 17-20.
11
多学科围手术期气道管理专家共识(2016年版)专家组.多学科围手术期气道管理专家共识(2016年版). 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2016,23(7): 641-645.
12
栗家平,杨小龙,丁伯应,等. 快速康复外科在肺癌根治术中的价值[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2016,26(22): 108-111.
13
Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery[J]. BMJ,2001,322(7284): 473-476.
14
汪进益,陈国涵,洪暄,等. 快速康复外科对非小细胞肺癌患者术后肺部并发症的影响[J].中国医师杂志,2011,13(1): 38-40.
15
Yang D, He W, Zhang S, et al. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative clinical recovery and immunity after elective surgery for colorectal carcinoma: randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2012, 36(8): 1874-1880.
16
王文昊,朱自江,袁继宝,等.快速康复外科理念在胸腔镜下肺癌根治围手术期的临床应用[J].实用医药杂志,2017,34(6): 513-515.
17
Zhao JH, Sun JX, Huang XZ, et al. Meta-analysis of the laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast track surgery[J]. Nt J Colorectal Dis, 2016,31(3): 613-622.
18
刘鸣. 系统评价、Meta-分析设计与实施方法[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:66-73.
19
方忠民,蓝斌,杨彦龙,等. 快速康复外科理念在胸腔镜肺癌手术中的应用[J]. 广东医学,2015,36(8): 1226-1229.
20
乔坤,曾绮桥,林少霖,等.胸腔镜联合加速康复外科流程在肺癌手术中应用的临床研究[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2013,6(1): 29-33.
21
Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J, et al. Enhanced recovery after urological surgery: a contemporary systematic review of outcomes,key elements, and research needs[J]. Eur Urol,2016,70(1): 176-187.
22
Loop T. Fast track in thoracic surgery and anaesthesia: update of concepts[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2016,29(1): 20-25.
23
谢冬,陈昶,朱余明,等.单孔胸腔镜手术的现状与展望[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2016,9(2): 73-76.
[1] 陆婷, 姜巧玲, 孙黎, 王雪静. 加速康复外科在肾移植围手术期应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 55-59.
[2] 许桂祥, 吴海华, 赵鸿志, 徐丽, 胡晓萍, 周世龙, 武永明, 彭新刚. 后鞘前入路腹腔镜视野下腹股沟区脂肪归属的解剖要点及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 277-281.
[3] 成紫琳, 戴明, 李建华, 马靓. 加速康复外科理念在儿童腹股沟疝围手术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 331-335.
[4] 王招荐, 曹桢, 郭小双, 靳小雷, 刘子文. 加速康复外科理念应用于腹壁重建手术的系统评价及Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 343-350.
[5] 杨轲, 丁增巴姆, 马静, 李盼盼, 陈婷. 全程无缝隙肺康复训练在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 801-804.
[6] 胡航, 陈婷婷, 孙健, 孙云浩, 仇丽敏. 三维重建技术在单操作孔胸腔镜肺段切除术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 310-312.
[7] 陆祥, 陈卫荣. 单孔胸腔镜肺段切除术与单孔胸腔镜肺楔形切除术在直径2 cm以下肺磨玻璃结节的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 95-98.
[8] 贾雪敏, 刘海元. 加速康复外科在卵巢囊肿患者围术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 36-38.
[9] 冯嘉楠, 蔡磊, 何国林, 付顺军, 张成, 冯周彬, 温耀鸿, 谭洪坤, 潘明新. 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石一期缝合的安全性与疗效:附128例分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 543-550.
[10] 朱志, 张鑫炜, 谭文斐, 高梓茗, 赵睿涵, 杨野, 王世洋, 智冬梅, 赵鑫, 尹长欣, 高畅远, 王锡山, 王振宁, 李凯, 周海涛. 直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术在日间手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 329-334.
[11] 李凯, 朱志, 周海涛, 王俊, 杨野, 赵鑫, 谷金蓉, 智冬梅, 王世洋, 高梓茗, 张鑫炜, 赵睿涵, 王锡山, 王振宁. 经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)在结直肠癌日间手术中的应用探索[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 63-67.
[12] 蔡剑桥, 蒋雷. 单孔胸腔镜与开胸双袖式肺叶切除治疗非小细胞肺癌对比[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 225-230.
[13] 陈小科, 吴晗, 丁征平. 胸腔镜下右肺上叶前段切除术[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 261-261.
[14] 裴耀飞, 耿俊峰, 王擎, 徐彪, 邹勤光, 张俊, 刘洋, 李志刚. 单孔胸腔镜右肺上叶S2切除术[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 208-208.
[15] 马建惠, 韩琦, 李韶玲. 加速康复外科护理路径+量化评估对腹腔镜胆囊切除术高龄患者手术室护理满意度的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 53-56.
阅读次数
全文


摘要