切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05): 270 -274. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2022.05.004

论著

经口腔前庭入路机器人甲状腺手术的学习曲线分析
李陈钰1, 贺青卿2, 庄大勇2, 周鹏2, 岳涛2, 邵长秀1, 刘永祥1, 徐婧2, 李小磊2,()   
  1. 1. 121000 锦州医科大学联勤保障部队第九六〇医院研究生培养基地;250031 济南,解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院甲乳外科
    2. 250031 济南,解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-17 出版日期:2022-10-30
  • 通信作者: 李小磊
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划专项课题(2019YFC0119205); 国家自然科学基金项目(81702448); 济南市临床医学科技创新计划(202019010); 原济南军区总医院院长基金资助项目(2016ZD02, 2017MS04)

A prospective study of learning curve of transoral robotic thyroidectomy

Chenyu Li1, Qingqing He2, Dayong Zhuang2, Peng Zhou2, Tao Yue2, Changxiu Shao1, Yongxiang Liu1, Jing Xu2, Xiaolei Li2,()   

  1. 1. Postgraduate Training Base of Jinzhou Medical University, The 960th Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Jinzhou 121000, China; Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The 960th Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Jinan 250031, China
    2. Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The 960th Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Jinan 250031, China
  • Received:2022-02-17 Published:2022-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Xiaolei Li
目的

探讨经口腔前庭入路机器人甲状腺手术(transoral robotic thyroidectomy, TORT)的学习曲线。

方法

前瞻性收集并分析2020年4月至2021年11月期间,就诊于解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院行TORT的70例患者的临床数据。采用累积和分析法拟合学习曲线,根据累积和值分为学习阶段和熟练阶段,探讨两个阶段的临床数据资料。

结果

70例患者均顺利完成TORT,无中转开放手术,手术时间129~490 min,平均(223.82±72.05)min;随访时间1~20个月,平均(10.23±5.43)个月;均无复发转移。选择并收集70例中连续进行的50例行甲状腺腺叶切除(含中央区淋巴结清扫)患者的临床数据进行统计分析,手术时间148~262 min,平均(205.68±57.59)min。采用累积和分析法发现,23例为跨越学习曲线掌握TORT的最低手术例数;学习阶段手术时间148~380 min,平均(238.17±63.32)min;熟练阶段手术时间134~262 min,平均(178±32.57)min。学习阶段和熟练阶段患者的手术时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);患者年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、中央区淋巴结清扫数、中央区淋巴结阳性数、术后拔管时间、并发症率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对于经验丰富的外科医师,严格选择合适患者后,TORT是安全、可行的,跨越TORT学习曲线需要累积的最低手术例数为23例。

Objective

To investigate the learning curve of transoral robotic thyroidectomy.

Methods

From Apr. 2020 to Nov. 2021, the clinical data of 70 patients who had received transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) at the 960th Hospital of PLA were gathered and studied prospectively. The cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) was used to fit the learning curve. According to the CUSUM value, it was divided into learning stage and proficiency stage, and the clinical data of the two stages were analyzed.

Results

All the 70 patients successfully underwent TORT without conversion to open operation. The mean operation time was (223.82±72.05)min, 129- 490 min. There was no recurrence or metastasis after a mean follow-up time of (10.23±5.43)months, 1-20 months. The data of 50 consecutive cases of thyroidectomy (including central lymph node dissection) were selected and collected for statistical analysis. The mean operation time was (205.68 ± 57.59)min, 148-262 min. The lowest number of operations to master TORT and cross the learning curve was explored using CUSUM: the mean operation time in the learning stage was(238.17 ± 63.32)min, 148-380 min, and the mean operation time of proficiency stage was (178 ± 32.57) min, 134-262 min. There was significant difference in operation time between learning stage and proficiency stage(P<0.05); There was no significant difference in age, gender, tumor size, the number of dissect of lymph nodes, the number of lymph nodes positive in the central area, the extubation days after surgery, and the rate of complications between the two stages(P>0.05).

Conclusions

TORT is safe and feasible for expert surgeons who carefully choose appropriate patients. It′s a total of 23 operations that must be accumulated to cross the TORT learning curve.

图1 70例行TORT患者中50例单侧腺叶切除(含中央区淋巴结清扫)的手术时间累积和学习曲线注:经口腔前庭入路机器人甲状腺手术(transoral robotic thyroidectomy, TORT)
表1 70例行TORT患者中50例单侧腺叶切除(含中央区淋巴结清扫)的学习阶段与熟练阶段的一般资料及围手术期数据
1
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
2
Kim WW, Lee J, Jung JH, et al. A comparison study of the transoral and bilateral axillo-breast approaches in robotic thyroidectomy[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2018, 118(3): 381-387.
3
Park D, Kim HY, Kim HK, et al. Institutional experience of 200 consecutive papillary thyroid carcinoma patients in transoral robotic thyroidectomy surgeries[J]. Head Neck, 2020, 42(8): 2106-2114.
4
李小磊,贺青卿,李陈钰. 经口腔前庭入路机器人甲状腺手术30例临床分析[J]. 中华外科杂志2021, 59(12): 994-998.
5
吴国洋,林福生. 经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术专家共识解读及争议[J]. 外科理论与实践2019, 24(6): 495-497.
6
李欣,侯纯升,白洋. 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的学习曲线:累积求和分析法[J]. 中国微创外科杂志2016, 16(3): 241-244.
7
秦倩,时飞宇,孙祺. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助胃癌根治术的学习曲线[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2019, 18(5): 459-465.
8
王平,燕海潮. 完全腔镜甲状腺癌手术并发症的防治[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志2012, 17(11): 806-809.
9
Nakayama M, Holsinger FC, Chevalier D, et al. The dawn of robotic surgery in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2019, 49(5): 404-411.
10
Tomikawa M, Xu H, Hashizume M. Current status and prerequisites for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)[J]. Surg Today, 2010, 40(10): 909-916.
11
Mohan HM, O′riordan JM, Winter DC. Natural-orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): minimally invasive evolution or revolution[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2013, 23(3): 244-250.
12
Moris DN, Bramis KJ, Mantonakis EI, et al. Surgery via natural orifices in human beings: yesterday, today, tomorrow[J]. Am J Surg, 2012, 204(1): 93-102.
13
Lee HY, You JY, Woo SU, et al. Transoral periosteal thyroidectomy: cadaver to human[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(4): 898-904.
14
Chai YJ, Kim HY, Kim HK, et al. Comparative analysis of 2 robotic thyroidectomy procedures: transoral versus bilateral axillo-breast approach[J]. Head Neck, 2018, 40(5): 886-892.
15
Chae S, Min SY, Park WS. Comparison study of robotic thyroidectomies through a bilateral axillo-breast approach and a transoral approach[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(2): 175-182.
16
Tai DKC, Kim HY, Park D, et al. Obesity may not affect outcomes of transoral robotic thyroidectomy: subset analysis of 304 patients[J]. Laryngoscope, 2020, 130(5): 1343-1348.
17
张彬,韩宗辉,Bikash Rai. 经口腔达芬奇机器人甲状腺手术初步经验[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(4): 234-237.
18
Chen YH, Kim HY, Anuwong A, et al. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy versus transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a propensity-score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(11): 6179-6189.
19
Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, et al. The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(1): 226-232.
20
Luo JH, Xiang C, Wang P, et al. The learning curve for transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery: a single surgeon′s 204 case experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(2): 163-169.
[1] 金壮, 朱亚琼, 张诗杰, 宋青, 罗渝昆. 基于甲状腺成像报告和数据系统分类的计算机辅助诊断系统对甲状腺癌超声诊断的辅助价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(05): 440-446.
[2] 杨满, 谢丽, 林栋材, 曹箭, 高纪东. 乳腺癌甲状腺转移一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 196-197.
[3] 李磊, 崔思倩, 张慧强, 赵芳, 刘静. 桥本甲状腺炎与甲状腺癌关系研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 308-312.
[4] 吴艳乐, 郑伟红, 李会, 张进军. 三种甲状旁腺识别和保护技术的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 87-90.
[5] 杨晓晴, 许洁, 郑桂彬, 王正寨, 林溪源, 郑海涛. 甲状腺癌喉返神经入喉处淋巴结转移的临床病理因素相关性分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 692-695.
[6] 梁加亮, 王永永, 张建勇, 赵代伟, 王南鹏, 李翼. 经口腔前庭入路单侧甲状腺癌手术的学习曲线(附48例经验总结)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 549-553.
[7] 闵逸洋, 赵宁, 王沛豪. cT1N0期甲状腺癌三种腔镜术式和开放术式的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 443-446.
[8] 陈伟, 邱钧, 李志贵, 朱锋, 唐国华, 李添亮. 胸锁乳突肌肌间入路对桥本病合并甲状腺乳头状癌临床运用分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 447-450.
[9] 尚利敏, 郑蒙蒙, 王志鹏, 杨洋, 孙雯, 张磊, 朱一辰. 改良手助后腹腔镜活体供肾切取术学习曲线研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 285-291.
[10] 魏勇, 沈露明, 朱辰, 成向明, 魏云飞, 袁琳, 苏健, 朱清毅. 单一术者机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术学习曲线分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 30-35.
[11] 王猛, 郑鲁明, 李小磊, 周鹏, 王刚, 朱见, 厉彦辰, 贺青卿. 经口腔前庭机器人甲状腺癌择区性颈淋巴结清扫的初步探讨[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 347-351.
[12] 陈尚雄, 肖航, 张荣杰, 李超, 张彬, 胡春芳, 郝迎学. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助脾动脉瘤切除重建术近期临床疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 376-380.
[13] 刘懿心, 朱见, 刘长瑞, 王丹, 周鹏, 王猛, 李陈钰, 贺青卿. 经口腔前庭入路机器人甲状腺手术神经保护的探索[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 211-216.
[14] 张苗苗, 雷蕾, 徐庶钦, 冒健骐, 白纪刚, 耿智敏, 吕毅, 严小鹏. 磁锚定两孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术学习曲线分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 77-81.
[15] 梁理娟, 蒙万添, 赖华强, 黄火莲. 彩色多普勒超声检查在甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 274-277.
阅读次数
全文


摘要