切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02): 108 -112. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.02.010

所属专题: 文献资源库

论著 上一篇    下一篇

改良单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除在基层医联体的推广应用
梁柳婵 1, 陈坤 1, 秦碧蕉 2, 吴祖爱 2, 张宁 3, 贺红英 1 , ( )   
  1. 1. 545007 柳州,广西柳州市柳铁中心医院妇产科
    2. 545400 柳州,广西融安县人民医院妇产科
    3. 545300 柳州,广西融水县人民医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-13 出版日期:2020-04-30
  • 通信作者: 贺红英
  • 基金资助:
    广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研项目(Z20180183)

Popularization and application of modified single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in primary medical conjoined hospitals

Liuchan Liang 1, Kun Chen 1, Bijiao Qin 2, Zuai Wu 2, Ning Zhang 3, Hongying He 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liuzhou Liutie Central Hospital, Guangxi Liuzhou 545007, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People′s Hospital of Rong′an County, Liuzhou 545400, China
    3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People′s Hospital of Rongshui County, Liuzhou 545300, China
  • Received:2020-02-13 Published:2020-04-30
  • Corresponding author: Hongying He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Hongying, Email:
目的

探讨改良单孔腹腔镜行卵巢囊肿剔除术在基层医联体医院推广应用的可行性。

方法

以柳州市柳铁中心医院医联体内医院为推广单位,选择2018年1月至2019年11月行卵巢囊肿剔除术患者86例,随机分为改良单孔腹腔镜组和传统腹腔镜组,分析患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后首次肛门排气时间、术后24 h视觉疼痛模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS)、切口美容满意度(BIS量表评分和CS量表评分)、住院费用、炎症指标等。

结果

2组均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹手术,术后无相关并发症,患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与传统腹腔镜组相比,改良单孔腹腔镜组摘除卵巢囊肿及缝合卵巢所需时间较长,但取标本时间较短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),改良单孔腹腔镜组住院时间、术后肛门排气时间及术后24 h VAS均低于传统腹腔镜组,BIS量表评分低于传统腹腔镜组,CS量表评分高于传统腹腔镜组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后WBC及超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)升高的比例较传统腹腔镜组较小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

改良单孔腹腔镜行卵巢囊肿剔除术在医联体内医院的推广是安全可行的。

Objective

To explore the feasibility of ovarian cystectomy with modified single-port laparoscopy in primary medical conjoined hospitals.

Methods

A total of 86 patients who underwent ovarian cystectomy from Jan. 2018 to Nov. 2019 were randomly divided into modified single-port laparoscopy group and traditional laparoscopy group. The indexes of patients were analyzed and compared, including operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, the time of first anal exhaust after operation, VAS score, cosmetic satisfaction after operation, hospitalization cost and postoperative inflammation index.

Results

The operation was successfully completed in both groups, there was no conversion to laparotomy, and there were no related complications after operation. There was no significant difference in total operation time, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization cost between the two groups (P> 0.05). Compared with the traditional group, the modified single-port group needed longer time to remove ovarian cyst and suture ovary, but the time of collecting samples was shorter. The hospital stay, postoperative anal exhaust time and VAS score in the modified single-port group were lower than those in the traditional group, and the cosmetic satisfaction of the abdominal wound in the modified single-port group was significantly higher than that in the traditional group (P< 0.05). The percentage of white blood cells and hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) increased after operation in the modified single-hole group was lower than that in the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05).

Conclusions

Ovarian cystectomy with modified single-port laparoscopy is safe and feasible in conjoined hospitals.

表1 卵巢囊肿患者的两组一般资料比较
图1 穿刺套管呈"品"字形
图2 术后的脐部切口
表2 两组卵巢囊肿患者的各手术步骤时间的比较(min, ±s)
表3 两组卵巢囊肿患者围手术期指标的比较( ±s)
表4 两组卵巢囊肿患者术前、术后炎症指标的比较[例(%)]
1
Choi SH, Hong S, Kim M,et al.Robotic-assisted laparo-scopic myomectomy:the feasibility in single-site system[J].Obstet Gynecol Sci,2019,62(1):56-64.
2
Chen SY, Sheu BC, Huang SC,et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique: four years experi-ence in 109 cases[J].Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2017,56(4):467-471.
3
徐城,杨晓秋,刘丹彦,等.常用的疼痛评估方法在临床疼痛评估中的作用[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2015,21(3):210-212.
4
Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, Hogezand RA, et al. Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for crohn′s disease[J]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12(11):1334-1340.
5
龚瑶,秦艳,代雪林,等.经脐单孔腹腔镜辅助下体外巨大卵巢肿瘤剥除术4例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(4):128-130.
6
李珺玮,陈义松,华克勤.单孔腹腔镜在妇科良性疾病中的应用[J].实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(3):170-172.
7
Musquera M, Peri L, Izquierdo L, et a1.Is LESS/NOTES surgery the new gold standard of minimally invasive surgery[J].Arch Esp Urol, 2013,66(1):161-167.
8
Kim TJ, Lee YY, An JJ, et al. Does single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy mean reduced pain: a retrospective cohort analysis between SPA and conventional laparoscopy[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012,162(1):71-74.
9
Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Marocco F, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for ovarian cyst enucleation: report of first 3 cases[J]. Fertility & Sterility, 2009, 92(3):13-16.
10
杨婷婷,邵洋,强萍,等.自制单孔多通道装置在妇科单孔腹腔镜手术中的应用价值[J]. 医药前沿,2018,8(1):161-163.
11
中国加速康复外科专家组.中国加速康复外科围手术期管理专家共识(2016)[J].中华外科杂志,2016,54(6):413-418.
12
李飞波,赵伏义,康青松,等.快速康复外科理念指导下的改良经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术围术期观察[J].浙江医学,2016,38(21):1761-1763.
13
郎景和,孙大为,刘海元,等.妇科单孔腹腔镜手术技术的专家意见[J].中华妇产科杂志,2016,50(10):724-726.
14
李武,胡仙珍,陈琳琳,等.经脐单孔三通道腹腔镜在普通妇科疾病中的应用[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2017,10(2):89-92.
15
Zhang CH, Wu L, Li PQ.Clinical study of the impact on ovarian reserve by different hemostasis methods in laparoseopie cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma[J].Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics& Gynecology,2016,55(4):507-511.
16
刘俊玲,曹颖,陈继明,等.微切口单孔腹腔镜卵巢缝合术的方法初探[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2019,12(5):298-300.
17
刘秀,温蒙科,刘海元,等.单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术的临床对照研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2017,52(10):675-678.
18
朱容,龙燕,董述全.单孔与传统多孔法腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术效果对比分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2019,27(9):1193-1196.
[1] 张新梅, 赵华巍, 夏宇, 张一休, 戴晴, 姜玉新. 胎儿卵巢囊肿产前超声图像特点及预后评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(05): 444-450.
[2] 李圆圆, 董晓秋. 超声引导下医用乙醇联合聚桂醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(06): 438-444.
[3] 崔晏春, 贾立群, 王晓曼. 新生儿及婴儿期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的超声表现[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(03): 198-201.
[4] 王玉, 盛洁, 靳灵鸽, 蒋子文, 卢丹. 不同止血方式对腹腔镜下卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿剥除术后卵巢储备功能的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(04): 420-424.
[5] 黄梅梅, 尹如铁. FOXL2基因在卵巢颗粒细胞瘤中的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 349-352.
[6] 曲思娆, 赵曼曼, 李全红, 李芳, 马晶晶, 张义男, 景思然, 孙建丽. 无气腹V-NOTES与传统腹腔镜治疗卵巢囊肿临床疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 217-220.
[7] 朱一萍, 隋孟松, 郑真真, 吉梅, 张彦丽, 孙静. 经阴道自然腔道腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的学习曲线[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 85-89.
[8] 张鑫, 张磊, 赵淑萍. 腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 367-371.
[9] 刘刚, 周骏, 杨发武, 杨诚, 宋正尧, 梁朝朝. 小儿脐尿管囊肿伴感染误诊为卵巢囊肿蒂扭转一例初步经验并文献复习[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(04): 250-252.
[10] 梁柳婵. 改良单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 0-0.
[11] 张真, 李俐辉, 张海滨, 郭清, 侯旭宁, 王海兴, 崔荣. 单孔腹腔镜联合经脐小切口体外妊娠期巨大卵巢囊肿剥除术的临床应用价值[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(06): 361-365.
[12] 林文雯, 赵仁峰. 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在妊娠合并巨大卵巢囊肿治疗中的研究及应用现状[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(04): 253-256.
[13] 陈思敬, 綦小蓉, 王亚雯, 陈琳, 郑莹. 经阴道自然腔道内镜及传统腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿的临床对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(02): 86-91.
[14] 王丹莹, 刘海元. 单孔腹腔镜在巨大卵巢囊肿剔除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(06): 331-334.
[15] 朱胜彬, 周宏, 潘运龙. 腹腔巨大肿物伴CA125严重代谢异常1例[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2019, 05(01): 58-60.
阅读次数
全文


摘要