切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02): 86 -91. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2019.02.006

所属专题： 文献资源库；

论著 上一篇    下一篇

经阴道自然腔道内镜及传统腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿的临床对比分析
陈思敬 1, 綦小蓉 1, 王亚雯 1, 陈琳 1, 郑莹 1 , †( )   
  1. 1. 610041 成都，四川大学华西第二医院妇产科出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-04 出版日期:2019-04-30
  • 通信作者: 郑莹
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅科研课题(2017SZ0064)

Clinical analysis of ovarian cystectomy by means of access. transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and laparoscopy

Sijing Chen 1, Xiaorong Qi 1, Yawen Wang 1, Lin Chen 1, Ying Zheng 1 , †( )   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second Hospital, Birth Defects and Related Mather and Child Diseases Ministry of Education Key Laboratory, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2019-03-04 Published:2019-04-30
  • Corresponding author: Ying Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Ying, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( )
目的

对比经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, vNOTES)和传统腹腔镜下卵巢囊肿手术治疗的可行性及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年11月至2018年4月，于四川大学华西第二医院同期进行手术治疗的18例卵巢囊肿患者的相关信息，按照手术途经分为vNOTES组及传统腹腔镜组，每组9例。统计并分析患者基线情况、手术相关数据。

结果

18例患者手术均顺利完成，均未改变手术方式，无围手术期并发症的发生。基线情况中的盆腹腔手术史部分，vNOTES组较传统腹腔镜组少，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。手术相关数据中vNOTES组与传统腹腔镜组的平均手术时间分别为115 min和108.89 min，术前与术后血红蛋白下降分别为16.22 g/L和16.33 g/L，住院时间分别为2.78 d和3.33 d，疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale，VAS)分别为1.89分和2.78分，术后1周美容评分分别为22.67分和17.78分，组间差异均无统计学意义。但在术后4周、术后24周美容评分上vNOTES组满意度较高，vNOTES组与传统腹腔镜组分别为(23.44分vs 18.56分)和(23.89分vs 19.11分)，与传统腹腔镜组存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。

结论

vNOTES较传统腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿有着独到的美容优势，充分的病情评估及病例选择后vNOTES途经是安全可行的。

关键词: 经阴道, 内镜手术, 卵巢囊肿
Objective

To evaluate and compare the feasibility and safety via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and laparoscopy for ovarian cysts.

Methods

The present retrospective cases series included consecutive patients who underwent ovarian cysts surgery through vNOTES and laparoscopy access at West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, between Nov. 2017 and Apr. 2018. There were 18 women, each group contain 9 patients. A statistical analysis for the data of patients and surgery situation was did.

Results

All the 18 surgeries were successfully performed, without convention, there were no noticeable complications during or after operation.For the part of surgery history, the vNOTES group showed less number compared with laparoscopic group(P<0.05). Compared the groups between vNOTES and laparoscopy surgery in terms of the mean operation time was 115 min vs 108.89 min, the mean drop of hemoglobin level was 16.22 g/L vs 16.33 g/L, the mean length of hospitalization was 2.78 d vs 3.33 d, the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 1.89 vs 2.78 at 12 h after operation, the mean time for cosmetic scale (CS) score was 22.67 vs 17.78 for 1 week after surgery, and 23.44 vs 18.56 after 4 weeks, all of them did not show significant differences among the groups. But the vNOTES group showed higher CS score at 4 weeks(23.44 vs 18.56)and 24 weeks(23.89 vs 19.11)compared to the laparoscope (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Since vNOTES showed high patient satisfaction with the scarless result, after fully evaluated and selected, the vNOTES access approaches were feasible and safe compared to laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cystectomy.

Key words: Transvaginal, Endoscopic surgery, Ovarian cysts
图1 经阴道自然腔道内镜手术途经卵巢囊肿剥除手术
表1 vNOTES组与传统腹腔镜组患者的基线情况对比
组别 例数 年龄(岁， ±s) 体质量指数(kg/m2， ±s) 卵巢体积(cm3， ±s) 既往盆腹腔手术史(例)
vNOTES组 9 40±13.32 21.23±1.67 63.56±33.02 1
传统腹腔镜组 9 34±7.81 22.23±3.25 73.9±44.03 5
t值 ? 0.27 0.43 0.43 0.04
P值 ? 0.09 0.14 0.39 0.04
表2 vNOTES组与传统腹腔镜组术中、术后情况对比( ±s)
组别 例数 手术时间(min) 术中出血量(ml) 血红蛋白下降(g/L) 住院时间(d) 排气时间(h)
vNOTES组 9 115±36.91 8.44±8.55 16.22±5.78 2.78±0.44 16.78±5.56
传统腹腔镜组 9 108.89±53.37 12.78±7.55 16.33±6.28 3.33±0.50 17.93±5.08
t值 ? 0.78 0.27 0.97 0.24 0.65
P值 ? 0.11 0.98 0.92 0.33 0.89
组别 例数 下床活动时间 (h) 术后12 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(分) 美容评分(分)
术后1周 术后4周 术后24周
vNOTES组 9 17.82±2.47 1.89±1.05 22.67±1.00 23.44±0.53 23.89±0.33
传统腹腔镜组 9 18.51±4.88 2.78±1.09 17.78±1.09 18.56±1.13 19.11±1.76
t值 ? 0.71 0.10 0.49 <0.00 <0.00
P值 ? 0.16 0.80 0.71 0.02 0.01
图2 阴道后穹窿切口愈合情况
1
Kale A, Sarlibrahim B, Basol G. Hysterectomy and salphingoopherectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)：turkish surgeons′ initial experience[J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2017, 12(47)：62-68.
2
朱一萍，赵栋，隋孟松，等. 经阴道自然腔道内镜卵巢囊肿剥除术十例临床分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(1)：24-27.
3
Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, et al. Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery[J]. Surg Endosc，2009，23(8)：1770-1774.
4
Seven R, Barbaros U. Needloscopy-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009, 19(2)：61-63.
5
Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES-world′s first report[J]. Surg Endosc，2008，22(5)：1343-1347.
6
Caetano Júnior Elesiário Marques, Paiva VJ, Monteiro MFRMA, et al. Evaluation of systemic inflammatory responses in cholecystectomy by means of access. single-port umbilical incision, transvaginal NOTES, laparoscopy and laparotomy[J]. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, 2015, 30(10)：691-703.
7
Chou LY, Sheu BC, Chang DY, et al. Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: a randomized trial[J]. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2010, 153(2): 198-202.
8
Moulton LJ, Michener CM, Levinson K, et al. Compliance with research standards within gynecologic oncology fellowship: a gynecologic oncology fellowship research network (GOFRN) study[J]. Gynecologic Oncology，2017，146(3)：647-652.
9
Gunderson CC, Knight J, Ybanezmorano J, et al. The risk of umbilical hernia and other complications with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012, 19(1)：40-45.
10
Wang CJ, Huang HY, Huang CY, et al. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for nonprolapsed uteri[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29(1)：100-107.
11
Wang CJ, Wu PY, Kuo HH, et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (NAOC vs. LOC): a case-matched study[J]. Surg Endosc，2016，30(3)：1227-1234.
12
Kallidonis P, Panagopoulos V, Kyriazis I, et al. Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery[J]. World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34(6)：779-787.
13
Sewell T, Courtney H, Tawfeek S, et al. The feasibility and safety of transvaginal bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet，2018，141(3)：344-348.
14
Ismail Abrahams FF. Vaginal hysterectomy: dispelling the myths[J]. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Canada, 2007, 29(10)：786-786.
15
程赞荣. 54例卵巢囊肿患者行经阴道卵巢囊肿剥除术的临床分析[J]. 河南外科学杂志，2018，24(4)：143-144.
16
Dave K. The place of oophorectomy at vaginal hysterectomy[J]. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1992, 99(2)：170-170.
17
Nwosu CR, Gupta JK. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 1999, 13(2)：148-150.
18
Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) adnexectomy for benign pathology compared with laparoscopic excision (NOTABLE): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(1)：18059-18059.
[1] 张新梅, 赵华巍, 夏宇, 张一休, 戴晴, 姜玉新. 胎儿卵巢囊肿产前超声图像特点及预后评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2021, 18(05): 444-450.
[2] 陈昌钊, 吴汤娜, 符叶柳, 林芳艳. 女性基础性激素、抗苗勒管激素水平联合经阴道三维超声在卵巢储备功能评估中的作用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2020, 17(12): 1208-1212.
[3] 梁娜, 吴青青, 岳嵩, 玄英华, 孙丽娟. 经腹部超声联合经阴道超声诊断血管前置的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2020, 17(06): 514-517.
[4] 王玉, 盛洁, 靳灵鸽, 蒋子文, 卢丹. 不同止血方式对腹腔镜下卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿剥除术后卵巢储备功能的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(04): 420-424.
[5] 林斯锋, 张伟, 詹兴云. 经自然腔道取标本的腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 90-93.
[6] 徐福建, 谢铭. 经自然腔道取标本在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的应用进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 107-110.
[7] 曲思娆, 赵曼曼, 李全红, 李芳, 马晶晶, 张义男, 景思然, 孙建丽. 无气腹V-NOTES与传统腹腔镜治疗卵巢囊肿临床疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 217-220.
[8] 刘娟, 肖媛月, 王倩青, 关振堃, 关小明. 盆腔器官脱垂手术新入路：机器人辅助经阴道腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 168-171.
[9] 朱一萍, 隋孟松, 郑真真, 吉梅, 张彦丽, 孙静. 经阴道自然腔道腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的学习曲线[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 85-89.
[10] 张鑫, 张磊, 赵淑萍. 腹壁缝合钳辅助单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 367-371.
[11] 张守枫, 秦真岳, 陈继明, 张文笛, 余红霞, 鲍明月, 王慧慧, 肖惠超, 曹颖, 郑亚峰, 蒋云芬, 施如霞. V-NOTES术后足月妊娠经阴道分娩成功案例报告[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 297-300.
[12] 李汉军, 梅洪亮, 卢绮萍. 困难胆管结石的外科微创治疗[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 115-121.
[13] 杨雪, 武帅, 仵正. 从外科角度看待胆管结石的内镜诊治[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 122-126.
[14] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会NOTES专委会. 经自然腔道内镜手术（NOTES）专家共识[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 337-342.
[15] 胡泽凡, 胡忠诚, 马建, 岳定雄, 张凯, 李琳. 洛贝林在老年患者内镜手术静脉麻醉中的应用价值[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 28-33.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号