切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 96 -102. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.02.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

经阴道自然腔道内镜全子宫切除手术的临床对比分析
陈珂瑶1, 孙力2,(), 李华1, 高玉涛1, 张旋1, 杨萌1, 杨文静1, 谭化明1, 潘玉英1   
  1. 1. 518116 深圳,国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院深圳医院妇科
    2. 100021 北京,国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院妇科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-03 出版日期:2020-04-30
  • 通信作者: 孙力
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市医疗卫生三名工程项目资助(SZSM201812075)

Clinical study of total hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

Keyao Chen1, Li Sun2,(), Hua Li1, Yutao Gao1, Xuan Zhang1, Meng Yang1, Wenjing Yang1, Huaming Tan1, Yuying Pan1   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hoapital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China
    2. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hoapital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
  • Received:2020-02-03 Published:2020-04-30
  • Corresponding author: Li Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponging author: Sun Li, Email:
引用本文:

陈珂瑶, 孙力, 李华, 高玉涛, 张旋, 杨萌, 杨文静, 谭化明, 潘玉英. 经阴道自然腔道内镜全子宫切除手术的临床对比分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 96-102.

Keyao Chen, Li Sun, Hua Li, Yutao Gao, Xuan Zhang, Meng Yang, Wenjing Yang, Huaming Tan, Yuying Pan. Clinical study of total hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(02): 96-102.

目的

探讨经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,vNOTES)在全子宫切除中应用的可行性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2019年4月至12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院深圳医院接受vNOTES全子宫切除术(vNOTES组)35例患者情况,结合文献报道的分析经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(经脐单孔腹腔镜组)、传统腹腔镜手术(传统腹腔镜组)患者数据,分析不同途径全子宫切除术的患者基线信息和手术情况。

结果

vNOTES组、经脐单孔腹腔镜组、传统腹腔镜组患者基线情况基本均衡具有可比性。vNOTES组手术时间45~172 min,平均(92.9±29.8)min;术中出血量20~400 ml,平均(119.4±83.9)ml;留置尿管时间10~41 h,平均(22.0±7.4)h;术后下床时间5~24 h,平均(17.3±4.2)h;肛门排气时间5~32 h,平均(16.8±6.8)h;术前术后血红蛋白差值0~45 g/L,平均(13.6±11.1)g/L;术后24 h的术后视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)0~3分,平均(1.0±1.1)分。术后患者满意度评分8~10分,平均(9.6±0.6)分。无邻近器官损伤、无输血、无术后感染等并发症的发生。三组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与经脐单孔腹腔镜组、传统腹腔镜组相比,vNOTES组术中出血量较多、肛门排气时较短,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。vNOTES组术后24 h VAS较传统腹腔镜组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。亚组比较结果显示,vNOTES大子宫组和传统腹腔镜组在手术时间方面提示较长,差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。与经脐单孔腹腔镜组和传统腹腔镜组相比,vNOTES大子宫组术中出血较多、肛门排气时间较短(P<0.01)。

结论

vNOTES全子宫切除是一种安全、可行的手术方式,在术后恢复及患者满意度方面优于经脐单孔腹腔镜及传统腹腔镜。vNOTES大子宫切除可能具有优势。

Objective

To discuss the feasibility and safety of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in total hysterectomy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried on the patients who underwent vNOTES total hysterectomy at the Shenzhen Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Hospital from Apr. to Dec. 2019. The 35 patients baseline information and surgical status of patients were compared with transumbilical single-hole laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy approaches which had reported in literatures.

Results

The baseline conditions of patients in vNOTES group, transumbilical single-hole laparoscopy group and traditional laparoscopy group were basically balanced and comparable. The operation time of vNOTES group was 45 to 172 min, with an average of (92.9±29.8)min; the intraoperative blood loss was 20 to 400 ml, with an average of (119.4±83.9)ml; the indwelling catheter time was 10 to 41h, with an average of (22.0±7.4)h; The postoperative bed leaving time was 5 to 24 h, with an average of (17.3±4.2)h; the postoperative exhaust time was 5 to 32 h, with an average of (16.8±6.8) hours; the preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin difference was 0 to 45 g/L, with an average of (13.6±11.1) g/L; the VAS score was 0 to 3 at 24 h after operation, with an average of (1.0±1.1)points; Postoperative patient satisfaction score was 8 to 10, with an average of (9.6±0.6)points. No adjacent organ damage, blood transfusion and postoperative infections occurred. There was no statistical difference in operation time among the three groups (P >0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the vNOTES group were more than those in the transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic group and the traditional laparoscopic group (P<0.01). The vNOTES group had shorter postoperative exhaust time than the other two groups, The VAS score is lower than the traditional laparoscopic group, and the differences are statistically significant (P<0.01). The results of the subgroup comparison showed that the operation time of vNOTES in hysterectomy of large uterus group is longer than the traditional laparoscopic group(P<0.05). Compared with the transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic group and the traditional laparoscopic group, the vNOTES in hysterectomy of large uterus group had more intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative exhaust time, the differences are both statistically significant (P<0.01).

Conclusions

vNOTES total hysterectomy is a safe and feasible surgical method, which is superior to transumbilical single-hole laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy in terms of postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction. vNOTES in total hysterectomy of large uterus may have advantages.

表1 vNOTES 全子宫切除患者基线信息与其他研究对比结果
表2 vNOTES 全子宫切除患者与其他研究手术情况对比结果
表3 vNOTES 组子宫≥12孕周18例患者与经脐单孔腹腔镜组、传统腹腔镜组对比
1
孙大为.单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科的应用探讨[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2013,6(1):5-8.
2
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H,et al.Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients[J].Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2014,21(5):818-824.
3
Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I,et al.Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) adnexectomy for benign pathology compared with laparoscopic excision (NOTABLE): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open,2018,8(1): 18059-18059.
4
Baekelandt J.Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to myomectomy[J].Fertil Steril,2018,109(1):179-179.
5
Baekelandt JF. New retroperitoneal transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery approach to sentinel node for endometrial cancer: a demonstration video[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2019,26(7):1231-1232.
6
Oh SH, Park SJ, Lee DJ,et al.Pelvic lymphadenectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for early-stage endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2019,153(1):211-212.
7
Lowenstein L, Baekelandt J, Paz Y, et al.Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy and apical suspension of the vaginal cuff to the uterosacral ligament[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2019,26(6):1015-1015.
8
黄晖媛,赵仁峰,李雪,等.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜行全子宫切除术的效果对比研究[J].中国临床新医学,2015,8(12):1127-1129.
9
Lauterbach R, Matanes E, Amit A,et al.Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic(vNOTES) hysterectomy learning curve: feasibility in the hands of skilled gynecologists[J]. Israel Medical Association Journal(IMAJ),2020,22(1):13-16.
10
Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I,et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial[J].BJOG,2019,126(1):105-113.
11
张俊吉,戴毅,孙大为,等.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术全子宫切除12例:可行性和安全性分析[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(3): 153-156.
12
Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, et a1.Total abdominal hysterectomy vel-sus total laparoseopic hysterectomy for benign disease:a meta analysis[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2009,144(1):3-7.
13
许丽娜,李立峰.腹腔镜下大子宫切除87例临床分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2005,10(4):233-234.
14
徐杨,赵曼曼,李全红,等.经阴道自然腔道内镜全子宫双附件切除术临床分析[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2019,12(2):100-102.
[1] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[2] 王酉, 严斌, 狄文, 楼微华. 经脐单孔腹腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术在早期子宫内膜癌手术中的探讨[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 173-176.
[3] 谭佳鸿, 施茹, 赵晗, 张粉, 吴小蝶, 赵琳, 冯云. 经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在妇科良性疾病治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 153-159.
[4] 张可欣, 孙大为, 任常. 国产单孔蛇形臂腹腔镜机器人在妇科领域的应用探索[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 106-110.
[5] 陈珂瑶, 柳祎, 孙力. vNOTES全子宫+前哨淋巴结切除治疗Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 21-25.
[6] 张海滨, 魏春娜, 侯旭宁, 于彩虹, 姚景润, 张真. 妇科良性疾病经脐单孔腹腔镜手术后疼痛程度与美观效果研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 51-54.
[7] 严斌, 缪慧娴, 王酉, 狄文, 楼微华. 经阴道内镜与单孔腹腔镜在子宫切除术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 39-44.
[8] 封意兰, 赵仁峰. 经脐单孔腹腔镜剔除特殊部位子宫肌瘤[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 26-29.
[9] 彭靖, 胡昌东, 华克勤, 陈义松. 经阴道自然腔道内镜下盆底重建术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 9-11.
[10] 孙大为, 张俊吉, 任常. 中国大陆妇科单孔腹腔镜手术技术的进步及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 1-3.
[11] 缪妙, 王一娜, 陈继明, 汤慧敏, 陈尧, 单武林, 贾秋成, 魏炜炜, 唐斌, 郑虹. 经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术临床分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 348-352.
[12] 杨晓英, 张葛, 徐晓萌, 孙雅欣, 苗月圆, 马迎春. 三种不同腹腔镜入路行大子宫切除术临床疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 331-337.
[13] 中国医师协会妇产科医师分会妇科单孔腹腔镜全国科研协作组. 妇科单孔腹腔镜手术镜下联合体外操作模式临床应用专家共识[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 200-209.
[14] 缪妙, 邢庭玮, 陈继明, 陈尧, 夏百荣, 单武林, 唐斌, 杜雨, 郑虹, 施如霞. 单孔腹腔镜镜下联合体外操作模式在妇科疾病诊治中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 120-123.
[15] 孙凤兰, 周萍, 程兴璞, 张倩倩. 腹腔镜全子宫切除术对子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤及术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 149-153.
阅读次数
全文


摘要