切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 348 -352. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2023.06.006

论著

经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术临床分析
缪妙, 王一娜, 陈继明(), 汤慧敏, 陈尧, 单武林, 贾秋成, 魏炜炜, 唐斌, 郑虹   
  1. 224000 江苏,盐城市第三人民医院,南京医科大学盐城临床医学院妇产科
    213003 江苏,南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院妇科
    233030 安徽,蚌埠医学院研究生院
    230031 安徽,中国科学技术大学第一附属医院妇科肿瘤科,中国科学技术大学生命科学与医学部
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-16 出版日期:2023-12-30
  • 通信作者: 陈继明
  • 基金资助:
    常州市"十四五"卫生健康高层次人才培养工程(2022CZBJ074); 江苏省妇幼健康重点人才项目(RC202101); 江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F202138); 江苏省博士后科研资助计划(2019K064); 江苏省"333工程"科研资助项目(BRA2019161)

Clinical analysis of single-port laparoscopic myomectomy via abdominal scar approach

Miao Miao, Yina Wang, Jiming Chen(), Huimin Tang, Yao Chen, Wulin Shan, Qiucheng Jia, Weiwei Wei, Bin Tang, Hong Zheng   

  1. Yancheng Third People′s Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yancheng School of Clinical Medical of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu 224000, China
    Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Changzhou Second People′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu 213000, China
    Graduate School of Bengbu Medical College, Anhui 233030, China
    Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui 230031, China
  • Received:2023-09-16 Published:2023-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Jiming Chen
引用本文:

缪妙, 王一娜, 陈继明, 汤慧敏, 陈尧, 单武林, 贾秋成, 魏炜炜, 唐斌, 郑虹. 经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术临床分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 348-352.

Miao Miao, Yina Wang, Jiming Chen, Huimin Tang, Yao Chen, Wulin Shan, Qiucheng Jia, Weiwei Wei, Bin Tang, Hong Zheng. Clinical analysis of single-port laparoscopic myomectomy via abdominal scar approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(06): 348-352.

目的

初步探讨经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2020年6月至2023年7月在南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院妇科行单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术的42例子宫肌瘤患者临床资料。根据手术方式分为经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔腹腔镜组14例和同期匹配的经脐入路单孔腹腔镜组28例。观察并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、血红蛋白下降值、术后首次肛门排气时间、术后住院天数、治疗费用、美容评分(cosmetic score, CS)和疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog score, VAS) 。

结果

两组患者的手术均顺利完成,术中未更改手术方式,术后未出现并发症。两组患者的术后住院天数、治疗费用、CS评分和术后12 h VAS评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05) 。经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔组的手术时间、术中出血量和血红蛋白下降值明显少于经脐入路单孔组;但经脐入路单孔组的术后首次肛门排气时间要短于经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05) 。

结论

经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术安全、可行,既秉承了微创手术疼痛轻、恢复快、"无痕"的理念,又优化手术步骤,缩短手术时间,减少术中出血,易于临床推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic myomectomy via of abdominal scar approach.

Methods

Clinical data of 42 patients with uterine fibroids who underwent single-port laparoscopic uterine myomectomy in the Department of Gynecology of the Affiliated Changzhou Second People′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from Jun. 2020 to Jul. 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the single-port laparoscopic group with transabdominal scar approach (14 cases) and in the simultaneous matched single-port laparoscopic group with transumbilical approach (28 cases) according to the surgical methods. The operation time, the loss of blood, the change of hemoglobin, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, postoperative hospitalization days, treatment cost, cosmetic score (CS), and visual analog score (VAS) of pain were observed and compared between the two groups.

Results

All operations were successfully completed in both groups, no intraoperative surgical changes and no postoperative complications. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative hospitalization days, treatment cost, CS score, and VAS score at 12 h after surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, the loss of blood and hemoglobin drop were significantly lower in the transabdominal scar approach group than in the transumbilical single-port group, however, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function was shorter in the transumbilical approach group than in the transabdominal scar approach group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy transabdominal scar approach is safe and feasible, which adheres to the concept of minimally invasive surgery with less pain, faster recovery and "no scar" , and optimizes the surgical steps, shortens the surgical time, reduces intraoperative bleeding, and is easy to be promoted for clinical application.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
图1 手术步骤注:A、B.肌瘤剥除:若较大的肌瘤无法在盆腔完整剥离时,可牵至切口处边削边剥,顺势而为;C、D.为体外操作模式下子宫创面的缝合;E.手指探查子宫,以防小肌瘤的残留;F.手术结束时的腹部切口(长约2 cm)。
表2 两组患者围术期指标比较
1
Bulun SE. Uterine fibroids[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(14):1344-1355.
2
Giuliani E, As-Sanie S, Marsh EE. Epidemiology and management of uterine fibroids[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2020, 149(1):3-9.
3
子宫肌瘤的诊治中国专家共识专家组. 子宫肌瘤的诊治中国专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志2017, 52(12):793-800.
4
Vilos GA, Allaire C, Laberge PY, et al. The management of uterine leiomyomas[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2015, 37(2):157-178.
5
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 112(2 Pt 1):387-400.
6
秦真岳,鲍明月,陈继明,等. 经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔腹腔镜下输卵管再通术[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志2021, 25(1):55-59.
7
Tang H, Dong Z, Qin Z, et al. Preliminary analysis of safety and feasibility of a single-hole laparoscopic myomectomy via an abdominal scar approach[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9:916792.
8
王慧慧,鲍明月,陈继明,等. 单孔腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术临床分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志2020, 24(4):295-300.
9
缪妙,邢庭玮,陈继明,等. 单孔腹腔镜镜下联合体外操作模式在妇科疾病诊治中的应用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(2):120-123.
10
朱兰,范融. 腹腔镜电动子宫肌瘤粉碎器临床应用的去向[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2016, 32(1):20-23.
11
中国医师协会妇产科医师分会妇科肿瘤专业委员会(学组). 实施腹腔镜下子宫(肌瘤)分碎术的中国专家共识[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志202036(7):626-632.
12
FDA discourages use of laparoscopic power morcellation for removal of uterus or uterine fibroids[OL]. Food Drug Adm.(2014-04-17)[2015-10-15]. J].

URL    
13
Rosenbaum L. N-of-1 policymaking-tragedy, trade-offs, and the demise of morcellation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(10):986-990.
14
关小明.单孔腹腔镜技术的发展及展望[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2019, 57(12):5.
15
中国医师协会微无创医学单孔与阴道腔镜学组. 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术脐部切口管理专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 实用妇产科杂志2022, 38(3):192-197.
16
Antoniou SA, Morales-Conde S, Antoniou GA, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(1):1-10.
17
唐均英,龚瑶. 单孔腹腔镜技术在妇科应用中的若干问题[J]. 第三军医大学学报2019, 41(7): 631-636.
[1] 吴萍, 陈艳, 陈丰华, 张立晶. 聚焦超声消融对阔韧带子宫肌瘤的临床疗效[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(12): 1203-1207.
[2] 吕祝英, 黄品同, 雷志锴, 楼军, 孔凡雷, 陈龙. 超声引导经皮穿刺聚桂醇硬化治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的临床应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(10): 991-997.
[3] 赵秀敏, 李杰, 彭洋颖, 姜健慧. 子宫腺肌病患者CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 mRNA及其蛋白表达水平[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(03): 309-315.
[4] 游小林, 干晓琴, 黄利琼, 张家佳, 张强, 黄璐, 袁薇, 李娟. 子宫肌瘤原位旋切法在腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(05): 566-570.
[5] 杨晓英, 张葛, 徐晓萌, 孙雅欣, 苗月圆, 马迎春. 三种不同腹腔镜入路行大子宫切除术临床疗效评估[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 331-337.
[6] 王靖, 高建建, 刘平, 陆美荣, 袁永兴, 胡茜, 孙亮亮, 李君亮, 王海琳. 达芬奇机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜在子宫良性疾病的临床应用分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 342-347.
[7] 顾成磊, 徐佳, 张妮娜, 赵路阳, 范文生. 机器人手术在困难子宫切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 283-287.
[8] 罗曼文, 黄桔园, 刘艳燕, 易跃雄, 陈雨柔, 熊家强, 王景涛, 张蔚. 单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤旋切隔离保护技术的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 220-226.
[9] 张葛, 金振伟, 李颖, 刘腾, 杨晓英, 徐晓萌, 马迎春. 经脐单孔腹腔镜加辅助孔行卵巢巨大恶性肿瘤全面分期手术一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 58-61.
[10] 金贝贝, 张玉泉, 李季, 高赛楠, 朱春玉, 丁晓颖, 杨晓清. 普通及机器人辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜在子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 163-167.
[11] 范秀华, 耿艳红, 范佳佳, 罗滢, 王锋良, 张冉. 经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(06): 347-350.
[12] 吴纯华, 符华影, 李钰彦, 刘启煌, 关小明, 刘娟. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(03): 176-178.
[13] 吉梅, 朱一萍, 葛蓓蕾, 隋孟松, 张彦丽, 顾磊, 孙静. 后入路法经阴道自然腔道内镜子宫肌瘤切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(03): 138-141.
[14] 孙凤兰, 周萍, 程兴璞, 张倩倩. 腹腔镜全子宫切除术对子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤及术后并发症的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 149-153.
[15] 刘珊珊, 张煦, 谭晓嫦, 沈敏, 黄联庆, 罗喜平. 高强度聚焦超声治疗腹型肥胖子宫肌瘤患者的临床效果及初步经验[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2019, 05(03): 137-141.
阅读次数
全文


摘要