切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 171 -175. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2019.03.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

单孔腹腔镜在克罗恩病手术治疗中的安全性及可行性研究
刘斌1, 郑磊1, 姚丹华1, 周致圆1, 李幼生1,()   
  1. 1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-20 出版日期:2019-06-30
  • 通信作者: 李幼生

Safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of Crohn′s disease

Bin Liu1, Lei Zheng1, Danhua Yao1, Zhiyuan Zhou1, Yousheng Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2019-05-20 Published:2019-06-30
  • Corresponding author: Yousheng Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Yousheng, Email:
引用本文:

刘斌, 郑磊, 姚丹华, 周致圆, 李幼生. 单孔腹腔镜在克罗恩病手术治疗中的安全性及可行性研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(03): 171-175.

Bin Liu, Lei Zheng, Danhua Yao, Zhiyuan Zhou, Yousheng Li. Safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of Crohn′s disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 12(03): 171-175.

目的

单孔腹腔镜手术(single-incision laparoscopic surgery,SILS)可进一步减轻手术对患者的创伤、加快患者术后康复。本研究拟探讨SILS应用于小肠克罗恩病患者围术期应用的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性收集2018年1月至2019年5月于笔者所在科室行克罗恩病手术治疗的患者32例,分为2组,收集研究对象的临床资料建立数据库。对比分析试验组(SILS组)17例与对照组(传统腹腔镜手术组)15例在术中出血量、手术时间、术后肛门首次排气时间、住院费用、术后炎症指标等方面的区别。对两组患者围术期情况比较分析。

结果

17例患者成功行单孔腹腔镜小肠部分切除术,无一例中转开腹或增加切口。SILS在术中出血、术后并发症发生率、术后肛门首次排气时间、住院时间及费用等方面与常规腹腔镜手术比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。SILS的手术时间较传统腹腔镜手术有所增加[(113.3±27.2)min比(89.2±22.8)min,P<0.01]。试验组患者术后第1天及第3天外周静脉血相关炎症指标WBC、CRP及PCT等水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患者术后无腹腔感染、腹腔脓肿及肠瘘等并发症发生。

结论

单孔腹腔镜小肠部分切除术具有和传统腹腔镜手术相当的安全性及可行性,相对于传统腹腔镜手术,SILS手术切口小且具有较好的美容效果,值得推广应用。但对术者的手术操作技术提出了更高的要求。

Objective

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) with enhanced recovery after surgery can reduce operation trauma and accelerate postoperative rehabilitation.This study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of SILS with ERAS in the treatment of Crohn′s disease.

Methods

Total 32 patients with Crohn′s disease were randomly assigned to receive traditional laparoscopic surgery (n=15) and SILS (n=17), who underwent laparoscopic partial small intestine resection in our department were collected. Database was established and analyzed retrospectively. Additionally, intraoperative bleeding, operation time, postoperative anal first exhaust time, hospitalization expenses, postoperative inflammation index were compared between single and multiple port laparoscopic hepatectomy respectively.

Results

17 patients were performed with single port laparoscopic partial small intestine resection successfully, no case of conversion to laparotomy or adding incision. There was no clinically significant difference between two groups in terms of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complication rate, postoperative anal first exhaust time (P>0.05). However, the operation time of single port laparoscopic was longer than the conventional laparoscopic surgery [(113.3±27.2)min vs (89.2±22.8)min, P<0.01]. There were significant differences in the postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between the two groups (P<0.05). WBC, CRP and PCT in SILS group was lower than those in the control group at the first days and the third days after operation, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no case of postoperative abdominal infection, abscess and intestinal fistula or other complications.

Conclusion

SILS can shorten postoperative hospital stay and facilitate bowel function recovery in the treatment of Crohn′s disease. It is worthwhile to mention the nice cosmetic benefits of SILS, the perioperative SILS is safe and feasible and should be popularized in Crohn′s disease.

表1 两组小肠克罗恩病患者的临床资料比较
图1 单孔腹腔镜Trocar手术装置及手术切口情况
表2 两组克罗恩病患者的术中观察指标比较(±s)
表3 两组克罗恩病患者的术后炎症指标比较(±s)
表4 两组克罗恩病患者的术后临床指标比较(±s)
1
Etoh T,Yasuda K,Inomata M,et al. Current status of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric malignancies[J]. Surg Technol Int,2010,20(1) : 153-157.
2
Lee Y,Fleming FJ,Deeb AP,et al. A laparoscopic approach reduces short-term complications and length of stay following ileocolic resection in Crohn′s disease : a analysis of outcomes from the NSQIP database [J]. Colorectal Dis,2012,14(5):572-577.
3
Taupyk Y,Cao X,Zhao Y,et al. Fast-track laparoscopic surgery: a better option for treating colorectal cancer than conventional laparoscopic surgery [J].Oncol Lett,2015,10(1): 443-448.
4
Zhao JH,Sun JX,Huang XZ,et al. Meta-analysis of the laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast track surgery [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2016,31(3): 613-622.
5
Maartense S,Dunker MS,Slors JF,et al. Laparoscopic assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn′s disease:a randomized trial [J].Ann Surg,2006,243(2):143-149.
6
Lesperance K,Martin MJ,Lehmann R,et al. National trends and outcomes for the surgical therapy of ileocolonic Crohn′s disease:a population based analysis of laparoscopic vs.open approaches [J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2009,13(7):1251-1259.
7
Rowe AJ,Meneghetti AT,Schumacher PA,et al.Perioperative analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(6) :1198-1203.
8
Podolsky ER, Curcillo II PG, Rottman SJ, et al. Single port access (SPA) surgery- initial experience of a novel minimal access approach applied across surgical specialties [J]. Surg Endosc,2008, 22(1):172-172.
9
Bucher P,Pugin F,Morel P.Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2008,23(10):1013-1016.
10
刘荣,赵国栋.LR式机器人胰十二指肠切除术手术方法建立和技术优化[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016,9(4):193-195.
11
刘斌,郑磊,姚丹华,等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜小肠部分切除治疗小肠克罗恩病两例[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ,2018,11(5):313-314.
12
周晓娜,张忠涛.经脐单孔腹腔镜外科技术应用现状和展望[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(1):42-43.
13
Canes D,Desai MM,Aron M,et al.Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status[J].Eur Urol,2008,54(5): 1020-1030.
14
Remzi FH,Kirat HT,Kaouk JH,et al.Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery[J].Colorectal Dis,2008,10 (8) : 823-826.
15
江志伟,黎介寿.自制经脐单孔腹腔镜装置进行胃肠手术的临床应用及营养管理[J].肠内与肠外营养,2010,17(1) : 5-7.
16
Ge JY,Wang L,Zou H,et al.Periumbilical laparoscopic surgery through triple channels using common instrumentation[J].Exp Ther Med,2013,5(4): 1053-1056.
17
Wagner MJ,Kern H,Hapfelmeier A,et al.Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients[J].World J Surg,2013,37(5): 991-998.
18
Trastulli S,Cirocchi R,Desiderio J,et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Br J Surg,2013,100(2): 191-208.
19
Wu XS,Shi LB,Gu J,et al.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2013,23(3): 183-191.
[1] 丁召, 李翊, 徐天天. 开腹探查+回盲部切除+小肠结肠吻合术[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 281-281.
[2] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[3] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[4] 刘明昊, 李晨, 王冰, 万政, 田文. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 376-382.
[5] 张蕾, 彭超, 周应芳. 直肠阴道隔子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜手术技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 257-261.
[6] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[7] 李干斌, 侯睿, 郭雅萍, 张潇, 邱小原, 牛备战, 林国乐. 改良经辅助切口回肠造口在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 271-276.
[8] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中国专家共识(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 193-198.
[9] 刘庭秀, 刘新敏, 刘莹, 隋娟, 武宇, 赵瑜敬, 毕红, 孙雪梅, 范秀华. 腹壁整形术后腹腔镜新脐入路治疗卵巢肿物的安全性探讨[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 189-192.
[10] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[11] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
[12] 孙鹏, 陈瑛罡. 腹部无辅助切口经肛门取标本的腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术一例(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 347-352.
[13] 吕东, 朱盛, 胡秋平, 徐如祥. 腹腔镜下直肠癌手术并发颅内静脉窦血栓一例报道[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 250-253.
[14] 陈利, 杨长青, 朱风尚. 重视炎症性肠病和代谢相关脂肪性肝病间的串话机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 385-389.
[15] 曹猛, 郭杰东, 朱灿, 许腾, 樊瑞智, 江涛, 宋军, 徐溢新. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中顺蠕动侧侧吻合的有效性及安全性评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 315-319.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?