切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03): 138 -141. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2019.03.003

所属专题: 文献资源库

论著 上一篇    下一篇

后入路法经阴道自然腔道内镜子宫肌瘤切除术的临床研究
吉梅 1, 朱一萍 1, 葛蓓蕾 1, 隋孟松 1, 张彦丽 1, 顾磊 1, 孙静 1 , ( )   
  1. 1. 201204 上海,同济大学附属第一妇婴保健院
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-13 出版日期:2019-06-30
  • 通信作者: 孙静
  • 基金资助:
    上海市自然科学基金项目(17ZR1421900)

Clinical study of hysteromyomectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery by posterior approach

Mei Ji 1, Yiping Zhu 1, Beilei Ge 1, Mengsong Sui 1, Yanli Zhang 1, Lei Gu 1, Jing Sun 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Health Hospital, Depart of Gynecology, Shanghai 201204, China
  • Received:2019-04-13 Published:2019-06-30
  • Corresponding author: Jing Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Jing, Email:
目的

探索和建立使用后入路法经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,vNOTES)在子宫肌瘤切除术中的技术和应用价值。

方法

选择上海市第一妇婴保健院妇科2017年11月至2019年3月期间21例后壁子宫肌瘤患者行vNOTES子宫肌瘤切除术,收集并分析手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症发生率、术后住院时间,术后视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、术后肠道功能恢复时间等临床资料。

结果

其中1例因后入路失败转经脐单孔腹腔镜操作,手术未造成其他脏器损伤;其余20例手术均顺利完成。20例患者的年龄32~48岁,平均(39.9±4.2)岁;体质量指数17.63~23.03 kg/m2,平均(20.7±1.73)kg/m2;手术时间80~135 min,平均(116.07±23.38)min;肌瘤直径5~9 cm,平均(6.96±1.22)cm;术中出血量50~300 ml,平均(78.57±69.93)ml;术后12 h VAS 2~4分,平均(2.14±0.66)分;术后排气时间12~46 h,平均(28.57±7.42)h;术后住院时间2.5~4 d,平均(3.3±0.67)d。无中转开腹手术,未输血,未发生手术并发症,经术后随访,未发生泌尿系及肠管损伤、切口愈合不良。

结论

vNOTES子宫肌瘤切除术对子宫后壁肌瘤是一种安全可行的可选术式,且较经脐单孔腹腔镜更加微创。

Objective

To explore and establish the value of the technique and application of transvaginal vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(vNOTES)by posterior approach in myomectomy.

Methods

21 patients with hysteromyoma of posterior wall who underwent hysteromyomectomy via vNOTES from Nov. 2017 to Mar. 2019 in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital were selected. Then clinical data including operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and recovery time of intestinal function were collected and analyzed.

Results

One case was transferred to transumbilical single-port laparoscopy due to failure of posterior approach, and the operation did not cause any organ damage. The other 20 cases were successfully completed. The age of 20 patients ranged from 32 to 48 years, with an average age of (39.9±4.2) years; body mass index 17.63-23.03 kg/m2, with an average of (20.7±1.73) kg/m2; operation time was 80-135 min, with an average of (116.07±23.38) min; The diameter of the leiomyoma was 5-9 cm, with an average of (6.96±1.22) cm; the intraoperative blood loss was 50-300 ml, with an average of (78.57±69.93) ml; the VAS score was 2-4 at 12 hours after operation, with an average of (2.14±0.66) points; the postoperative exhaust time was 12-46 h, with an average of (28.57±7.42) h; the postoperative hospital stay was 2.5-4 days, with an average of (3.3±0.67) days. There was no conversion to open surgery, no blood transfusion, no surgical complications, no urinary and intestinal injuries and poor wound healing occurred.

Conclusions

Hysteromyomectomy via vNOTES is a safe and feasible option for posterior hysteromyoma, and is more minimally invasive than transumbilical single-port laparoscopy.

1
Parker WH. Etiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas[J]. Fertility & Sterility, 2007, 87(4):725-736.
2
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Myomas and reproductive function[J]. Fertility & Sterility, 2008, 90(5):125-130.
3
Anja Herrmann, Rudy Leon De Wilde. Laparoscopic myomectomy-the gold standard[J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther,2014,3(3):31-38.
4
Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2009, 3(2):3677-3677.
5
Ahn KH, Song JY, Kim SH, et al. Transvaginal single-port natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for benign uterine adnexal pathologies[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2012,19(5):631-635.
6
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, et al. Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in adnexal procedures[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2012,19(4):509-513.
7
Yang YS, Hur MH, Oh KY, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for adnexal masses[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2013, 39(12):1604-1609.
8
Wang CJ, Huang HY, Huang CY, et al. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for nonprolapsed uteri[J]. Surg Endosc,2015, 29(1):100-107.
9
朱一萍,赵栋,孙静,等. 经阴道自然腔道内镜卵巢囊肿剥除术十例临床分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018,11(1):24-27.
10
Marescaux J,Dallemagne B,Perretta S,et a1.Surgery without schrs:report of transluminal cholecysteetomy in a human being[J].Arch Sarg,2007,142(9):823-826.
11
Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES-world′s first report[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22(5):1343-1347.
12
Ahmet Kale, Bahar Sarlibrahim, Gülfem Basol. Hysterectomy and salphingoopherectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES): turkish surgeons′ initial experience[J]. International Journal of Surgery,2017,47(1):62-68.
13
Jan Filip Baekelandt, Peter A De Mulder, llse Le Roy, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) adnexectomy for benign pathology compared with laparoscopic excision (NOTABLE): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018,8(1):18059-18059.
14
Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial[J]. BJOG,2019,126(1):105-113.
15
Ding DC, Chu TY, Hong MK. Hysterectomy and ovarian cystectomy using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: an initial experience at tzu chi general hospital[J]. Tzu-Chi Medical Journal, 2017, 29(4):208-212.
16
Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Kai-Yun Wu, Chen-Ying Huang, et al. The outcomes of transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy in various uterine sizes[J].Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology,2018,57(6):842-845.
17
Soo Hyun Oh,Soo Jin Park,Eun Ji Lee, et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for early-stage endometrial cancer[J].Gynecologic Oncology,2019,153(1):211-212.
18
Lee CL, Huang CY, Wu KY, et al. Natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery myomectomy: An innovative approach to myomectomy[J]. Gynecology & Minimally Invasive Therapy, 2014, 3(4):127-130.
[1] 陈昌钊, 吴汤娜, 符叶柳, 林芳艳. 女性基础性激素、抗苗勒管激素水平联合经阴道三维超声在卵巢储备功能评估中的作用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(12): 1208-1212.
[2] 梁娜, 吴青青, 岳嵩, 玄英华, 孙丽娟. 经腹部超声联合经阴道超声诊断血管前置的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(06): 514-517.
[3] 刘骞. 腹部无辅助切口经直肠拉出切除标本的腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术(NOSES Ⅱ)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 146-146.
[4] 王锡山. NOSES的发展历程与合理应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 153-153.
[5] 杜涛, 傅传刚, 周主青, 韩俊毅, 鲁兵. 3D腹腔镜无切口同期手术治疗高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 363-367.
[6] 林斯锋, 张伟, 詹兴云. 经自然腔道取标本的腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 90-93.
[7] 徐福建, 谢铭. 经自然腔道取标本在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的应用进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 107-110.
[8] 曲思娆, 赵曼曼, 李全红, 李芳, 马晶晶, 张义男, 景思然, 孙建丽. 无气腹V-NOTES与传统腹腔镜治疗卵巢囊肿临床疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 217-220.
[9] 刘娟, 肖媛月, 王倩青, 关振堃, 关小明. 盆腔器官脱垂手术新入路:机器人辅助经阴道腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 168-171.
[10] 朱一萍, 隋孟松, 郑真真, 吉梅, 张彦丽, 孙静. 经阴道自然腔道腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的学习曲线[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 85-89.
[11] 张守枫, 秦真岳, 陈继明, 张文笛, 余红霞, 鲍明月, 王慧慧, 肖惠超, 曹颖, 郑亚峰, 蒋云芬, 施如霞. V-NOTES术后足月妊娠经阴道分娩成功案例报告[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 297-300.
[12] 孙力. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜下全子宫+双附件切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 0-0.
[13] 孙力. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜下全子宫+双输卵管切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 0-0.
[14] 陈珂瑶, 孙力, 李华, 高玉涛, 张旋, 杨萌, 杨文静, 谭化明, 潘玉英. 经阴道自然腔道内镜全子宫切除手术的临床对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 96-102.
[15] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会NOTES专委会. 经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)专家共识[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 337-342.
阅读次数
全文


摘要