Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06): 357-363. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2022.06.008

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

Application of transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery in the treatment of giant benign ovarian tumors

Wenxian Li1, Hang Yu1, Fang Wen2, Wenwen Zhao1, Dan Zi3,()   

  1. 1. Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, China
    2. Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, China
    3. Guizhou Provincial People′s Hospital, Guiyang 550000, China.; People′s Hospital Affiliated to Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, China
  • Received:2022-10-20 Online:2022-12-30 Published:2023-01-20
  • Contact: Dan Zi

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the safety, feasibility and advantages of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in the treatment of giant ovarian benign tumors.

Methods

The clinical data of patients who underwent surgery for giant benign ovarian tumors (diameter≥10 cm) in the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University and Guizhou Provincial People′s Hospital from May 2020 to Jun. 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgery methods, the patients were divided into vNOTES (16 cases), laparoscopic single-site surgery (LESS, 54 cases) and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MLS, 38 cases). The operative time, cyst fluid leakage rate, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, 24 h postoperative pain visual analogue score, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, postoperative incision cosmetic score and short-term postoperative complication were compared and analyzed among the three groups.

Results

Compared with the LESS group and the MLS group, the vNOTES group had statistically significant differences in the cystic fluid leakage rate, postoperative exhaust time and pain score at 24 hours after operation (P< 0.05). There were no significant differences in the mass diameter size, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, total hospitalization cost, postoperative complications, postoperative inflammatory indicators, and ovarian tumor markers among the three groups (P> 0.05).

Conclusions

vNOTES surgery is safe and effective in the giant benign ovarian tumors. Compared with LESS and MLS groups, vNOTES surgery has the advantages of minimally invasive, lower cyst fluid leakage rate, shorter postoperative recovery time, and no scar on the body surface.

Key words: Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery, vNOTES, Giant benign ovarian tumors, Cyst reduction surgery, Laparoscopic surgery

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd