Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (05): 290-294. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.05.008

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The short-term treatment of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in endometrial cancer

Lei Jiang 1, Ruiquan Zhou 2, Peijing Yan 3, Liang Yao 4, Tiankang Guo 5, Hui Cai 6, Kehu Yang 7, Hailin Wang 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
    2. The Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    3. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
    4. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China; School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hongkong 999077, China
    5. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
    6. General Surgery Clinical Medical Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
    7. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2018-08-20 Online:2018-10-30 Published:2018-10-30
  • Contact: Hailin Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Hailin, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare short-term treatment between robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer, discuss the clinical advantages of robotic-assisted surgery in endometrial cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 108 patients with endometrial from Jan. 2014 to Oct. 2017 in Gansu Provincial Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. There were 52 cases in robotic-assisted surgery group (RS) and 56 cases in laparoscopic surgery group (LS). Multivariable linear regressions were used to explore the difference between the RS and LS in terms of the operation time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, lymph node counts. Multivariate Logistic regression model was used to evaluate the difference of transfer to ICU.

Results

In multivariable linear regressions, there was no significant difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay (P>0.05). However, the counts of lymph node in RS were significant increased compared to LS (Coe.=13.25, 95%CI: 8.30-18.21, P<0.05). In multivariate Logistic regression, there was no difference in the rate of transfer to ICU between two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusions

Robotic-assisted surgery has a comparable clinical benefit as laparoscopic surgery and provides an advantage in lymph node dissection.

Key words: Robotic-assisted surgery, Laparoscopic surgery, Endometrial cancer

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd