Clinical application of da Vinci robotic surgery in cervical cancer : with a report of 40 cases

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.02.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

The purpose of this study was to discuss the safety and feasibiIity of da Vinci robotic surgery-assisted resection of cervical cancer.

Methods

Department of gynecologic oncology, Jilin cancer hospital from Jul. 2015 to Jun. 2016 who underwent da Vinci robotic surgery-assisted resection of cervical cancer was retrospectively analyzed. The operating time, blood loss, number of conversion, number of harvested lymph node, postoperative intestinal peristalsis recovery time, the average hospital stay affer surgery were observed.

Results

All of the patients were operated successfully with no conversion, no iliac blood vessels, ureter, bladder and bowel pelvic organ damage, et al. The average operative time was (240.2 ± 60.3)min.The mean intraoperative blood loss was(65.6 ± 21.4)ml; The mean postoperative gastro intestinal function recovery time was(2.6 ± 1.0)d.All specimens stump were found with non-cancer cell infiliration, number of harvested lymph node was(23.1 ± 3.9). The average hospital stay affer surgery was(12.5 ± 2.1)d.

Conclusion

Da Vinci robotic surgery-assisted resection of cervical cancer is safe, feasible and efective.

Key words: Da Vinci robotic surgery, Cervical cancer, Resection of cervical cancer

Jinyu Liu, Xin Zhang, Chunying Gao, Jinxia Piao. Clinical application of da Vinci robotic surgery in cervical cancer : with a report of 40 cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(02): 93-96.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhqjwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.02.008

https://zhqjwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2017/V10/I02/93

References 22

1	Shen WS, Xi HQ, Chen L, et al. A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28(10): 2795-2802.
2	Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials[J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 12(1): 122.
3	Ishii H, Rai BP, Stolzenburg JU, et al. Robotic or open radical cystectomy, which is safer? a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies[J]. Journal of Endourology, 2014, 28(10): 1215-1223.
4	Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery[J]. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 1(1): 3-10.
5	Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20(8): 2759-2764.
6	Fagotti A, Corrado G, Fanfani F, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) vs. laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: a double-institution case-control study[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2013, 130(1): 219-223.
7	Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches[J]. Jsls Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2012, 16(16): 542-548.
8	Yong WJ, Sang WK, Kim YT, et al. Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology[J]．J Gynecol Oneol，2009，20(3): 137-144.
9	Ramirez PT, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2008, 110(3): 21-24.
10	Shafer A, Boggess JF. Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system [J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2008, 111(2): 18-23.
11	Maggioni A, Minig L, Zanagnolo V, et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2009, 115(1): 60-64.
12	Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, et al. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2008, 111(3): 425-430.
13	Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer[J]. Jsls Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2008, 12(3): 227-237.
14	Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2008, 15(15): 286-291.
15	Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, et al. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2008, 111(3): 425-430.
16	Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. the future is now[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics & Computer Assisted Surgery, 2007, 3(3): 224-228.
17	丁晓萍，张亭亭，侯庆香，等. 机器人手术系统、腹腔镜及开腹手术治疗宫颈癌的对比研究[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志，2014，19(7): 608-612.
18	Maggioni A, Minig L, Zanagnolo V, et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study [J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2009, 115(1): 60-64.
19	Kruijdenberg CB, Lc VDE, Hendriks JC, et al. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review [J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2011, 120(3): 334-339.
20	马佳佳，陈必良. 达芬奇机器人手术系统下保留盆腔自主神经宫颈癌广泛性子宫切除术肿瘤学安全性及临床疗效观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志，2015，12(1): 12-16.
21	Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy-a retrospective matched control study[J]. Fertility and Sterility, 2009, 91(2): 556-559.
22	郭芳芳，李冬青，齐金红，等. 机器人手术与传统腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术的临床比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(4): 224-227.

[1]	Yiran Wang, Ping Wang. Interpretation of the Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Oncologic Surgery for Pelvic Exenteration in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(02): 142-151.
[2]	Xiaoxia Zheng, Dapeng Li. Predictive values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for neoadjuvant chemotherapy effects in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(05): 558-566.
[3]	Juanping Yu, Qi Wei, Qianqian Wang, Zhongbao Chang, Hong Ye, Qinhua Xu, Xiaohua Li. Genotypes distribution of human papillomavirus in infected cervical tissue from 17 160 women for physical examination in Anhui area [J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 389-395.
[4]	Yingjie Su, Lei Dou, Dongli Tian, Enting Lu, Yi Zhang. The situs inversus totalis (SIT) patient undergoing robot assisted radical hysterectomy surgery successfully: a case report [J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 14(04): 245-247.
[5]	Yuying Pan, Li Sun, Guixiang Wang, Hua Li, Meng Yang. A case of recurrent cervical cancer treated by laparoscopic operation [J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 14(01): 53-57.
[6]	Lifang Ma, Dongling Zou, Qi Zhou. Application of da Vinci robot-assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer surgical staging [J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(05): 278-282.
[7]	Kai Ma, Chuandong Sun, Bingyuan Zhang, Fabo Qiu, Shun Zhang, Weidong Guo, Xiaoxiao Li, Chengzhan Zhu, Hao Zou, Zehua Wu, Mengqi Song, Yujie Feng, Bing Han. Clinical analysis of robotic ultrasonic-coagulation-suture in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with the Kimura technique [J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(02): 113-118.
[8]	Yanhong Lyu, Xiangdong Ma, Shujuan Liu, Wei Zou, Jiajia Ma, Jia Li, Ru Jing, Biliang Chen. Single center experience and consideration of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 12(04): 231-235.
[9]	Jing Guo, Weihong Qi. Effects of circ_0000218 on the proliferation, migration and invasion of cervical cancer HeLa cells by sponging miR-1182 [J]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(02): 113-119.
[10]	Xin Liao, Yiping Gu, Wei Liao. Effects and mechanisms of low intensity ultrasound-induced apoptosis of HeLa tumor cells [J]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(05): 277-282.
[11]	Quan Shou, Qian Wang, Zhiyuan Tan. Effect and mechanisms of miR-98-5p targeting PYGO2 gene on proliferation, migration and invasion of cervical cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(03): 138-145.
[12]	Hongfang Li, Xiaohuan Zhao, Liping Wang, Xiaoyan Xu, Gaogao Sun. Screening and development of new biomarkers and diagnostic biomarkers for cervical cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition), 2019, 09(06): 375-384.
[13]	Ping Liu, Jiulin Pan. Therapeutic value of salvage radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic recurrence and uncontrolled disease after radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 267-271.
[14]	Xiaoqi Xu, Zhilian Wang. Research progress on risk factors for human cervical papillomavirus infection [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 308-311.
[15]	Yue Zhang, Fujia Gu. Influence of MDR1 methylation on the curative effect of interventional embolism chemotherapy for cervical cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(01): 51-56.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export