切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 215 -219. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2026.04.004

专家论坛

腹膜后淋巴结清扫术在妇科恶性肿瘤中的应用进展
孟黄洋, 周树林, 邱江南, 程文俊†()   
  1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院(江苏省人民医院)妇科
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-09 出版日期:2026-08-30
  • 通信作者: 程文俊

Progress in the application of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies

Huangyang Meng, Shulin Zhou, Jiangnan Qiu, Wenjun Cheng†()   

  1. Department of Gynecology, Jiangsu Provincial People′s Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 210029, China
  • Received:2026-07-09 Published:2026-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Wenjun Cheng
引用本文:

孟黄洋, 周树林, 邱江南, 程文俊. 腹膜后淋巴结清扫术在妇科恶性肿瘤中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 215-219.

Huangyang Meng, Shulin Zhou, Jiangnan Qiu, Wenjun Cheng. Progress in the application of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 19(04): 215-219.

腹膜后淋巴结清扫是妇科恶性肿瘤手术分期及清除转移淋巴结的重要方式,但其分期价值并不等同于生存获益。随着临床证据的积累、前哨淋巴结示踪技术的推广,以及基于病理和分子特征的风险评估体系不断完善,淋巴结手术逐渐由常规系统性清扫转向个体化评估与选择性清扫。对于仍需清扫的患者,腹腔镜、机器人及经脐单孔技术的发展,以及经腹膜与腹膜外入路的合理应用,为减少手术损伤提供了更多选择。如何精准选择患者,并在保证清扫质量的同时降低并发症,是当前临床关注的重点。本文结合宫颈癌、子宫内膜癌和卵巢癌的治疗特点,综述腹膜后淋巴结清扫的适应证、清扫范围、入路选择及微创技术进展,探讨其在满足分期和治疗需要、保护长期生活质量方面的价值与局限。

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is an important component of surgical staging and the removal of metastatic lymph nodes in gynecologic malignancies, but its staging value does not necessarily translate into a survival benefit. As clinical evidence accumulates, sentinel lymph node mapping becomes more widely used, and risk assessment based on pathological and molecular features improves, nodal surgery is moving from routine systematic dissection toward individualized assessment and selective lymphadenectomy. For patients who still require dissection, advances in laparoscopic, robotic, and transumbilical single-port surgery, together with appropriate selection of transperitoneal or extraperitoneal access, offer more options to reduce surgical morbidity. Selecting suitable patients and limiting complications without compromising the adequacy of dissection remain key clinical concerns. This review discusses the indications, extent of dissection, surgical approaches, and advances in minimally invasive techniques for retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers. It examines the benefits and limitations of the procedure in meeting staging and treatment needs while preserving long-term quality of life.

[1]
ASTEC Study Group, Kitchener H, Swart AMC, et al. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study[J]. Lancet, 2009, 373(9658): 125-136.
[2]
Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2008, 100(23): 1707-1716.
[3]
Harter P, Sehouli J, Lorusso D, et al. A randomized trial of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian neoplasms[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(9): 822-832.
[4]
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Cibula D, et al. ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma: update 2025[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2025, 26(8): e423-e435.
[5]
Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, et al. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2021, 155(Suppl 1): 28-44.
[6]
Cibula D, Raspollini MR, Planchamp F, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer - update 2023[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2023, 33(5): 649-666.
[7]
Köhler C, Mustea A, Marnitz S, et al. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 213(4): 501-503.
[8]
Tsunoda AT, Marnitz S, Soares Nunes J, et al. Incidence of histologically proven pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases and rate of upstaging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial[J]. Oncology, 2017, 92(4): 213-220.
[9]
Marnitz S, Tsunoda AT, Martus P, et al. Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020, 30(12): 1855-1861.
[10]
Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18(3): 384-392.
[11]
Cusimano MC, Vicus D, Pulman K, et al. Assessment of sentinel lymph node biopsy vs lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-grade endometrial cancer staging[J]. JAMA Surg, 2021, 156(2): 157-164.
[12]
Chen Y, Zheng Y, Chen S, et al. An advantageous technique for fertility sparing staging surgery of epithelial ovarian cancer with a single umbilical incision[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2023, 33(9): 1471-1472.
[13]
Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(32): 5331-5336.
[14]
Vasilev SA, McGonigle KF. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1996, 61(3): 315-320.
[15]
Díaz-Feijoo B, Correa-Paris A, Pérez-Benavente A, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometrial and ovarian cancer: the STELLA trial[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(9): 2966-2974.
[16]
Díaz-Feijoo B, Bebia V, Hernández A, et al. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 160(1): 83-90.
[17]
Prodromidou A, Machairas N, Spartalis E, et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Anticancer Res, 2018, 38(8): 4677-4681.
[18]
Li K, Deng X, Wu T. Surgical outcomes of transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy compared with extraperitoneal approach in gynecologic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8: 779372.
[19]
高介芳,王霞,郝晓莹. 腹腔镜腹膜外入路与经腹膜入路腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术有效性及安全性的meta分析[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2022, 30(11): 2017-2023.
[20]
Bentivegna E, Koual M, Nguyen-Xuan H, et al. Docking for robotic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with da Vinci Xi surgical system[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 2021, 50(8): 102131.
[21]
Bebia V, Gil-Moreno A, Hernández A, et al. Robot-assisted extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated with fewer surgical complications: a post hoc analysis of the STELLA-2 randomized trial[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(12): 2004-2012.
[22]
王乔,郑莹. 机器人手术在妇科领域的应用及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(5): 304-307.
[23]
Pakish J, Soliman PT, Frumovitz M, et al. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 132(2): 366-371.
[24]
Hudry D, Ahmad S, Zanagnolo V, et al. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2015, 25(3): 504-511.
[25]
Da Costa AG, Borghesi Y, Hudry D, et al. Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(5): 861-866.
[26]
周树林,罗成燕,袁琳,等. 子宫内膜癌经脐单孔腹膜外路径淋巴结切除术中腹膜后腔的建立[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(1): 44-47.
[27]
Ballet E, Rousseau C, Raia Barjat T, et al. Robotic retroperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy via single-site port[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 2023, 52(10): 102675.
[28]
綦小蓉,陈思敬,郑莹. 单孔腹腔镜在妇科恶性肿瘤治疗中的利与弊[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(6): 370-373.
[1] 陈汉鑫, 赵廷虎, 岳志军, 张烨, 朱远彬, 张勇. 关节镜治疗顽固性止点性跟腱炎的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 510-514.
[2] 戴红梅, 李双喜, 李子禹. 我国腹腔镜胃癌手术治疗现状与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 103-107.
[3] 白雪峰, 熊家强, 宋锐南, 陈雨柔, 吕琼莹, 张蔚. 机器人宫颈癌根治手术的并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 132-134.
[4] 郭宏涛, 马怡彤, 姚志强, 毕学汉, 刘畅. 妇科经脐单孔腹腔镜腹膜后入路腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 135-139.
[5] 王静静, 徐亚雄, 关小明, 胡晓洁, 窦晓卫, 张春花. 达芬奇Xi-vNOTES与术锐SP-vNOTES在子宫切除术中的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 153-158.
[6] 李亚楠, 黄向华. 阴道内镜在女性生殖道畸形诊治中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 77-82.
[7] 宋佳耕, 袁文翰, 郑莹. 人工智能在妇科微创手术中的应用与展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 60-64.
[8] 牛海鹏, 王石. 脾脏肿瘤诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 529-536.
[9] 李中宇, 杨谨闻, 麻勇. 微创脾部分切除术的发展现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 545-550.
[10] 田帅, 夏晓静, 胡肖廷, 原姚谦, 周泇言, 陈倩倩, 令狐恩强. 中国消化领域资深专家对超级微创手术(SMIS)理念的认知度与认可度及推广现状:一项全国性问卷调查[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 81-92.
[11] 原姚谦, 令狐恩强. 超级微创保全器官根治胃癌的临床策略[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 73-77.
[12] 尚辉辉, 贾雯, 刘娇, 杨新, 王静. 两种内镜治疗方式在G1期直肠神经内分泌瘤中的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 18-24.
[13] 令狐恩强. 基于超级微创手术理论再看人体生命观的解构与重建[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 5-9.
[14] 梁斌. 在超级微创(SMIS)理念引领下[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 72-72.
[15] 陈倩倩, 吕昆明, 李惠凯, 令狐恩强. 超级微创阶梯式全层切除术在早期胃癌治疗的应用规范[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 10-12.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?