切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06): 343 -347. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.06.005

论著 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术的学习曲线研究
赵勇1, 朱军1, 赵玉涓1, 张斌1, 高东伟1, 尹淑慧1, 赵克1, 丁健华1, 卓光鑽1,†()   
  1. 1. 100088　北京，火箭军特色医学中心肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-26 出版日期:2021-12-30
  • 通信作者: 卓光鑽

Learning curve of laparscopic sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer

Yong Zhao1, Jun Zhu1, Yujuan Zhao1, Bin Zhang1, Dongwei Gao1, Shuhui Yin1, Ke Zhao1, Jianhua Ding1, Guangzuan Zhuo1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, PLA Rocket Force Characteristics Medical Center, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2021-10-26 Published:2021-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Guangzuan Zhuo
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( )
目的

探讨腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术学习曲线及其对术后并发症及肿瘤根治效果的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2009年9月至2014年12月火箭军特色医学中心肛肠外科由同一组具有丰富开腹手术经验医师完成的208例腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术的临床资料。采用移动平均法绘制手术时间曲线，并定义曲线达到稳定状态所对应的手术例数为学习曲线。根据学习曲线，将患者分为A组(学习曲线阶段组)和B组(熟练阶段组)；分别比较两组患者的一般临床资料、术后并发症及切除标本的病理结果。

结果

手术时间的移动平均曲线在手术例数达到80例时，进入稳定状态，将患者分为A组(第1~80例)和B组(第81~208例)。B组的肿瘤距肛门平均距离低于A组(P<0.05)；B组合并呼吸系统疾病和接受直肠癌经括约肌间切除术的比例高于A组(P<0.05)。B组的手术时间、术中出血量较A组减少(P<0.05)。两组总的术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)，但B组的术后尿潴留发生率显著低于A组(P<0.05)。两组术后标本病理检查结果中远端切缘均为阴性；两组淋巴结检出数目和环周切缘阳性比例比较，差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

具有丰富开腹经验的外科医师在其腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术学习曲线阶段，可以保证良好的肿瘤根治效果；但应关注可能发生的术后排尿功能障碍。

关键词: 腹腔镜手术, 直肠癌, 保肛术, 学习曲线
Objective

To investigate the learning curve of laparscopic sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer and its influence on postoperative complications and oncological safety.

Methods

Between Sep. 2009 and Dec. 2014, 208 consecutive patients who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer were enrolled in the present study. The learning curve was analyzed based on operative time using the moving average method. The cut-off point at which the mean operative time stabilized was defined as learning curve. The patients were divided into A (learning period) and B (experienced period) group. Data including the patients′ demographic characteristics, surgical characteristics, pathological results, postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The learning curve analysis for operative time using the moving average method showed stabilization at 80 cases, and the patients were divided into A (1-80 cases) and B group (81-208 cases). Patients had lower tumor distance from anal verge in group B than in group A (P<0.05). A significantly higher proportion of combined respiratory disease and inter sphincteric resection (ISR)were observed for patients in group B than they in group A (P<0.05). Both the operating time and blood loss were significantly lower in group B than they in group A. The rate of overall postoperative complications in group A had no significant difference compared with it in group B (P>0.05), but the rate of urinary retention was significantly lower in group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the pathological results between the 2 groups, including number of harvested lymph nodes, ratio of positive circumferential margin, and ratio of affected distal margin.

Conclusions

Surgeons in the learning curve period of laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer, could allow oncological safety, but they should pay attention to possibly high rate of postoperative urinary dysfunction.

Key words: Laparoscopic surgery, Sphincter-saving resection, Rectal cancer, Learning curve
图1 直肠癌经括约肌间切除术手术步骤注：A.保留左结肠动脉，清扫第253组淋巴结；B.显露左侧输尿管及生殖血管；C.分离直肠后间隙，保护双侧腹下神经；D.切断后方Hiatal韧带，进入括约肌间间隙；E.LONE-STAR拉钩牵拉显露肛门及肿瘤，标记下切缘；F.脱出并离断肠管，拟行结肛吻合；G.结肛手工吻合；H.术后常规行回肠袢式造口
图2 腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术的手术时间曲线
表1 腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术的两组临床一般资料比较
临床参数 学习曲线阶段组(第1~80例) 熟练阶段组(第81~208例) t(χ2，Z)值 P值
年龄[岁，中位数(范围)] 62.5(23~83) 62.0(25~85) 0.181 0.856a
性别[例(%)]        
  男 44(55.0) 79(61.7) 0.920 0.338b
  女 36(45.0) 49(38.3)    
体质量指数[kg/m2，中位数(范围)] 24.0(15.2~32.0) 24.5(17.9~39.1) 1.707 0.089a
术前放射治疗[例(%)] 3(3.8) 8(6.3) 0.614 0.536c
合并其他疾病[例(%)]        
  糖尿病 18(22.5) 24(18.8) 0.430 0.512b
  高血压 30(37.5) 38(29.7) 1.366 0.243b
  呼吸系统疾病 1(1.3) 12(9.4) 5.547 0.019b
肿瘤下缘距肛门距离[cm，中位数(范围)] 7(2~15) 5(1~15) 2.290 0.023a
手术方式[例(%)]        
  直肠癌前切除术 61(76.3) 77(60.2) 5.711 0.017b
  直肠癌经括约肌间切除术 19(23.8) 51(39.8)    
预防性末端回肠造口[例(%)] 37(46.3) 73(57.0) 2.297 0.130b
中转开腹[例(%)] 4(5.0) 2(1.6) 2.077 0.207c
手术时间[min，中位数(范围)] 240(125~475) 165(60~345) 7.715 <0.001d
术中出血量[ml，中位数(范围)] 100(20~800) 50(10~800) 5.832 <0.001d
TNM分期[例(%)]        
  0、Ⅰ、Ⅱ期 47(58.8) 70(54.7) 0.330 0.566b
  Ⅲ、Ⅳ期 33(41.3) 58(45.3)    
表2 腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术的两组术后并发症和病理结果比较
临床参数 学习曲线阶段组(第1~80例) 熟练阶段组(第81~208例) χ2(Z)值 P值
术后并发症[例(%)] 30(37.5) 37(28.9) 1.665 0.197a
  吻合口出血 0(0.0) 1(0.8) 0.628 1.000b
  尿潴留 23(28.8) 19(14.8) 5.908 0.015a
  泌尿系感染 10(12.5) 7(5.5) 3.243 0.072a
  吻合口瘘 8(10.0) 11(8.6) 0.117 0.732a
  肠梗阻 4(5.0) 10(7.8) 0.620 0.431a
  切口感染 2(2.5) 1(0.8) 1.023 0.561b
  回肠造口缺血 0(0.0) 1(0.8) 0.628 1.000b
  小肠瘘 1(1.3) 0(0.0) 1.608 0.385b
术后病理情况        
  检出淋巴结数目[枚，中位数(范围)] 13(6~17) 16(3~38) 0.341 0.366c
  环周切缘阳性[例(%)] 1(1.3) 4(3.1) 0.738 0.651b
  远端切缘阳性[例(%)] 0(0.0) 0(0.0) - -
1
Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, et al. Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012，55(12):1300-1310.
2
郑民华，马君俊．低位直肠癌腹腔镜保肛手术学习曲线和技术准入[J]．中国实用外科杂志，2014，34(9):831-834.
3
Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B, et al. The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution's experience[J]. Ann Surg, 2010，251(2):249-253.
4
Kim CH, Kim HJ, Huh JW, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic low anterior resection in terms of local recurrence[J]. Journal of surgical oncology, 2014，110(8): 989-996.
5
Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009，13(2):275-281.
6
Kayano H, Okuda J, Tanaka K, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer [J]. Surg Endosc，2011，25(9):2972-2979.
7
Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, et al. Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007，21(2):238-243.
8
Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, et al. Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009，23(2):403-408.
9
Luj NJ, Gonzalez A, Abrisqueta J, et al. The learning curve of laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer does not increase morbidity[J]. Cirugía Española (English Edition), 2014，92(7):485-490.
10
朱晓明，楼征，龚海峰，等．具有开放手术经验外科医师腹腔镜直肠癌根治术学习曲线研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志，2016，36(5):566-568.
11
Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1，000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008，23(4):839-846.
12
Lee SY, Kang SB, Kim DW, et al. Risk factors and preventive measures for acute urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery[J]. World J Surg, 2014，39(1):275-282.
13
赵勇，侯小玲，赵玉涓，等．直肠癌术后尿潴留的危险因素分析[J]．中华胃肠外科杂志，2017，20(3):295-299.
14
Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010，11(7):637-645.
15
Demyttenaere S, Feldman LS, Fried GM. Effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal perfusion and function: a systematic review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007，21(2):152-160.
16
Kawada K, Sakai Y. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis[J]. World J Gastroentero, 2016，22(25):5718-5727.
17
Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1，014 consecutive patients[J]. J Am Coll Surgeons，2015，220(2):186-194.
18
Mrak K, Uranitsch S, Pedross F, et al. Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial[J]. Surgery, 2016，159(4):1129-1139.
[1] 项世骏, 黄陈. 达芬奇机器人低位直肠癌根治术[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 80-80.
[2] 张娟, 马静, 杨雷, 刘牧林, 徐鑫星, 叶枫林. FTS对腹腔镜结直肠癌患者术后并发症和炎性因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 218-221.
[3] 沈晓菲, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 康星, 宋鹏, 王峰, 王萌, 赵阳, 杜峻峰, 陆晓峰, 管文贤. 3D腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术的学习曲线[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 79-83.
[4] 余向南, 袁野, 路小欢, 曹阳, 蔡明, 陶凯雄, 王征, 王国斌. 直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏的预测研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 111-114.
[5] 刘和谦, 陶凌松, 王家伟, 陈弋生, 邹滨, 沈旭东. 肾蒂血管处理新策略对缩短后腹腔镜下肾癌根治术学习曲线的正面作用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 147-150.
[6] 黄嘉宇, 黄强, 王德娟, 马波, 瞿虎, 尧冰, 钟文文, 叶雷, 郭强, 王磊, 吴坚坚, 邱剑光, 汪中扬. 以直肠癌症状为表现的前列腺癌诊疗体会及文献复习[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 177-180.
[7] 李善琳, 杨晓斌, 倪婧婧. SupremeTM喉罩在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的麻醉效果及对应激指标的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 172-175.
[8] 张葛, 金振伟, 李颖, 刘腾, 杨晓英, 徐晓萌, 马迎春. 经脐单孔腹腔镜加辅助孔行卵巢巨大恶性肿瘤全面分期手术一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 58-61.
[9] 汤庆超, 朱亿豪, 袁子茗, 焦帅, 胡汉卿, 王玉柳明, 马天翼, 乔天宇, 刘明, 王贵玉, 王锡山. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术367例真实世界研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 108-113.
[10] 鞠后琼, 刘东宁, 仲崇晗, 何鹏辉, 叶善平, 王大强, 李太原. 机器人腹部无辅助切口经直肠取出标本的右半结肠合并中位直肠癌根治术（附视频）[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 172-176.
[11] 庄成乐, 刘正, 张锋敏, 王峥, 王峰, 陈清, 刘骞, 刘忠臣. 基于精准吻合器和刘氏吻合三步法的改良PPS术与传统PPS术治疗超低位直肠癌的非随机病例对照临床研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 30-35.
[12] 刘恩瑞, 关旭, 魏然, 姜争, 刘正, 陈瑛罡, 王锡山. 新辅助治疗反应对局部进展期直肠癌患者预后的影响[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 44-53.
[13] 杨勇, 郑帆, 黄彬, 郑恢超, 田跃, 童卫东. 结直肠同时性+异时性多原发四重癌一例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 82-85.
[14] 张建锋, 胡旭华, 王贵英. 直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫相关热点问题再探讨[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(11): 801-804.
[15] 张兰, 李胜棉. 转移性结直肠癌免疫检查点抑制剂治疗研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(11): 805-813.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号