切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06): 335 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.06.006

所属专题: 文献资源库

论著 上一篇    下一篇

经阴道自然腔道内镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌的可行性和安全性分析
王延洲 1, 姚远洋 1, 李宇迪 1, 陈诚 1, 徐嘉莉 1, 梁志清 1 , ( )   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,第三军医大学第一附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-25 出版日期:2018-12-30
  • 通信作者: 梁志清
  • 基金资助:
    第三军医大学第一附属医院临床新技术原始创新型重点项目(SWH2016YSCXZD-07)

Natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: feasibility and safety analysis

Yanzhou Wang 1, Yuanyang Yao 1, Yudi Li 1, Cheng Chen 1, Jiali Xu 1, Zhiqing Liang 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2018-09-25 Published:2018-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Zhiqing Liang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liang Zhiqing, Email:
目的

探讨经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,NOTES)治疗子宫内膜癌的可行性、安全性。

方法

2017年8月至2018年7月前瞻性纳入第三军医大学第一附属医院妇产科诊断为子宫内膜癌的患者,行NOTES。统计患者人口学特征、围手术期参数和临床疗效。

结果

5例患者均成功完成手术。其中2例阴式子宫切除,3例NOTES子宫切除,所有5例附件切除均在NOTES下完成。3例盆腔淋巴结清扫,1例盆腔前哨淋巴结活检,1例盆腔淋巴结清扫+腹主动脉周围淋巴结切除。中位手术时间195 min(130~235 min),中位术中出血量100 ml (50~200 ml),中位术后住院时间5 d(4~9 d)。中位术后肠道功能恢复时间17 h(12~32 h),中位术后12 h疼痛评分1分(1~2分),中位术后24 h疼痛评分1分(1~1分)。术后中位随访时间4个月,所有患者阴道残端切口愈合良好。

结论

NOTES可安全、有效地用于子宫内膜癌全面分期手术,但需要进一步的进行临床研究,评估其完整的临床应用。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and safety of transvaginal natural endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for endometrial carcinoma.

Methods

From Aug. 2017 to Jul. 2018, patients with endometrial carcinoma were prospectively enrolled in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University. Demographic characteristics, perioperative parameters and clinical outcome were statistically analyzed.

Results

All 5 patients were successfully operated. Vaginal hysterectomy was performed in 2 patients, NOTES hysterectomy was performed in 3 patients, and all 5 cases of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed under NOTES. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 3 patients, sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 1 patient, and pelvic lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 1 patient. The median operative time was 195 minutes (130-235 minutes), the median blood loss was 100 ml (50-200 ml), and the median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (4-9 days). The median postoperative recovery time was 17 hours (12-32 hours), the median postoperative 12 hours pain score was 1 (1-2) and the median postoperative 24 hours pain score was 1 (1-1). The median follow-up time were 4 months, the vaginal stump incision healed well in all patients.

Conclusions

NOTES is a safe and effective method for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma, but further clinical studies are needed to evaluate its complete clinical application.

表1 5例子宫内膜癌患者的一般情况及手术结局
表2 5例子宫内膜癌患者的病理学结局
[1]
Mariani A, Elnashar SA, Dowdy SC. Lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: which is the right question[J]. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Official Journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2010, 20(2):52-54.
[2]
Kornblith AB, Huang HQ, Walker JL, et al. Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a gynecologic oncology group study[J].J Clin Oncol,2009,27(2):5337-5342.
[3]
Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, et al. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review[J]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010, 116(6):1422-1431.
[4]
Chang WC, Lee LC, Huang SC, et al. Application of laparoscopic surgery in gynecological oncology[J]. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 2010, 109(8):558-566.
[5]
Palomba S, Falbo A, Mocciaro R, et al. Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2009, 112(2):415-421.
[6]
Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2009, 112(1):126-133.
[7]
Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Scambia G. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for total hysterectomy[J]. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2010, 109(1):76-77.
[8]
Fanfani F, Rossitto C, Gagliardi ML, et al. Total laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery (LESS) hysterectomy in low risk early endometrial cancer: a pilot study[J]. Surg Endosc,2011,26(1):41-46.
[9]
Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, et al. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial[J]. Fertility & Sterility, 2011, 96(1):255-259.
[10]
Escobar PF, Bedaiwy MA, Fader AN, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease[J]. Fertility & Sterility, 2010, 93(6):7-10.
[11]
Boruta DM, Growdon WB, Schorge JO. Single-incision laparoscopic staging for endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2011, 120(1):9-9.
[12]
刘海元,陈欣,孙大为,等.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在异位妊娠中的应用八例分析[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(1):20-23.
[13]
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2014, 21(5):818-824.
[14]
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, et al. Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in adnexal procedures[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2012,19(4):509-513.
[15]
张俊吉,戴毅,孙大为,等.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术全子宫切除12例:可行性和安全性分析[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(3):153-156.
[16]
Lee CL, Wu KY, Tsao FY, et al. Natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecology & Minimally Invasive Therapy, 2014, 3(3):89-92.
[17]
Leblanc E, Narducci F, Bresson L, et al. Fluorescence-assisted sentinel (SND) and pelvic node dissections by single-port transvaginal laparoscopic surgery, for the management of an endometrial carcinoma (EC) in an elderly obese patient[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2016,143(3):686-687.
[18]
王延洲,陈诚,徐嘉莉,等. "筷子法"单孔腹腔镜技术在宫颈癌中的应用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018,11(1):28-31.
[1] 曹言言, 彭仁国, 文芳, 訾聃. 单孔腹腔镜对Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌手术患者疼痛及负性情绪的影响分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 90-96.
[2] 孙力. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜下全子宫+双输卵管切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 0-0.
[3] 陈珂瑶, 孙力, 李华, 高玉涛, 张旋, 杨萌, 杨文静, 谭化明, 潘玉英. 经阴道自然腔道内镜全子宫切除手术的临床对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 96-102.
[4] 王留利, 侯凡, 聂夏子, 王蓉蓉, 王海琳. ERAS理念在腹腔镜子宫内膜癌全面分期手术围手术期应用的效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(03): 146-149.
[5] 吕小慧, 郭欣, 李佳, 李玲霞, 杨红, 邹伟, 王建, 陈必良, 张潍, 刘淑娟. 机器人单孔腹腔镜在妇科手术中的初步应用探讨[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(03): 154-158.
[6] 蒋燕明, 赵仁峰. 经阴道NOTES在妇科领域中的应用现状[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(02): 126-128.
[7] 姜蕾, 周瑞泉, 闫沛静, 姚亮, 郭天康, 蔡辉, 杨克虎, 王海琳. 机器人与腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜癌短期疗效对比[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(05): 290-294.
[8] 张俊吉, 戴毅, 孙大为, 刘海元, 王媛, 朱兰, 冷金花, 刘珠凤, 郎景和. 经阴道自然腔道内镜手术全子宫切除12例:可行性和安全性分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(03): 153-156.
[9] 李武, 胡仙珍, 刘松君, 陈琳琳, 谢继平, 阮凡, 吕雯. 宫腔镜诊断早期子宫内膜癌的价值及安全性研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(03): 160-162.
[10] 郭芳芳, 赵月鸣, 冯文娟, 刘彦江, 齐力, 刘丽颖, 左佳, 袁勇. 机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的临床疗效对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(03): 166-169.
[11] 齐金红, 袁勇, 刘彦江, 周丽萌. 达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(06): 366-372.
[12] 周莉, 王首寒, 袁勇, 孙小单. 前哨淋巴结绘图在子宫内膜癌手术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(05): 273-276.
[13] 张翠荣. 脂联素通过PERK/eIF2a介导的内质网应激通路调节子宫内膜癌细胞增殖、凋亡和胰岛素敏感性[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 240-245.
[14] 丁智颖. 抑癌基因PTEN及其假基因PTENP1在子宫内膜癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(04): 252-256.
[15] 王庆敏, 尹香花. L1细胞黏附分子在早期子宫内膜癌中研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(13): 2002-2005.
阅读次数
全文


摘要