Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02): 73-78. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2023.02.003

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative analysis of robot pancreaticoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy under the background of ERAS

Qian Li1, Kai Cheng1, Chuanfu Li1, Shuo Qi1, Chengming Ding1, Jun He1, Guodong Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
  • Received:2022-12-27 Online:2023-04-30 Published:2023-06-01
  • Contact: Guodong Chen

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the safety, short-term efficacy and advantages of robotic surgery system in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Methods

The clinical data of 88 patients with pancreatic diseases who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with da Vinci Robotics operation system and laparoscopic surgery system in the first affiliated Hospital of South China University from Mar. 2015 to Mar. 2022 were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

All patients were operated successfully. In the robot group (38 cases), the median operation time was 5.00 h(4.15 h, 5.73 h), the median intraoperative blood loss was 100.00 mL (50.00 mL, 150.00 mL), 1 case had abdominal infection. Among the postoperative accelerated rehabilitation indexes, the median time of first feeding, defecation, drainage and hospital stay were 3.00 d(2.75 d, 4.00 d), 5.00 d(4.00 d, 6.00 d), 12.00 d(8.00 d, 14.25 d) and 13.50 d(9.75 d, 16.00 d) respectively. In the laparoscopy group (n=50), the median operation time was 8.00h and the median intraoperative blood loss was 200.00 mL (150.00 mL, 200.00 mL), 7 cases were converted to laparotomy, 10 cases had abdominal infection. Among the postoperative accelerated rehabilitation indexes, the median time of first feeding, defecation, drainage and hospital stay were 5.00 d(4.00 d, 6.00 d), 6.00 d(5.00 d, 6.00 d), 20.00 d(16.00 d, 21.75 d) and 19.50 d(17.00 d, 29.25 d) days respectively. There was significant difference in the above-mentioned indexes between the two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Under the background of enhanced recovery after surgery, RPD has more obvious advantages than LPD in operative safety, complications and rapid recovery.

Key words: Robotic surgery, Laparoscopic surgery, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Enhanced recovery aftery surgery

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd