Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06): 347-351. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.06.007

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of early removal of chest tube after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery

Ao Yu 1, Zichen Jiao 1, Tao Wang 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2020-06-16 Online:2020-12-30 Published:2020-12-30
  • Contact: Tao Wang

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the feasibility and safety of early removal of chest tube after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery and explore the indication of removal of chest tube.

Methods

117 patients were selected as the observation group who performed video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery in the department of cardiothoracic surgery from Nov. 2019 to Apr. 2020, in Drum Tower Hospital, affiliated with Nanjing University Medical School, and removed chest tube after operation early (in 48 hours). 114 patients with routine removal of chest tube were selected as the control group who performed video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery in the same hospital from Nov. 2018 to Apr.2019. Age (P=0.476), sex (P=0.216), surgical methods (P=0.715), mediastinal lymph node dissection or sampling (P=0.200), target lobes (P=0.925), pathological nature (P=0.957) were similar between the two groups. This retrospective study analyzed the postoperative clinical results, complications and recurrent pleural drainage after extubation between the two groups.

Results

There were significant differences in the amount of drainage before extubation in 24 hours [(245.7±98.1)ml vs(120.8±46.8)ml, P<0.001], the time of drainage after operation [(43.9±2.6)h vs(84.5±10.5)h, P<0.001], hospitalization time of postoperative [(2.2±0.4)d vs(4.2±1.1)d, P<0.001], hospitalization cost [(53 000±4 000)yuan vs (56 000±3 000)yuan, P<0.001], the VAS score after extubation [(4.4±1.2) vs (3.3±1.2), P<0.001], and incidence of total complications after extubation (20.5% vs 10.5%, P=0.036) between the two groups. The VAS score before and after extubation in the observation group [(5.9±0.8) vs(4.4±1.2), P<0.001]and the VAS score before and after extubation in the control group [(6.0±0.9) vs (3.3±1.2), P<0.001]were statistically significant. The VAS score before extubation [(5.9±0.8) vs(6.0±0.9), P=0.464], the incidence of pneumothorax after extubation (1.7% vs 0.9%, P>0.999), pleural effusion (12.8% vs 6.1%, P=0.084), cutaneous emphysema (2.6% vs 1.8%, P>0.999), fever (3.4% vs 1.8%, P=0.703) and recurrent pleural drainage(2.6% vs 1.8%, P>0.999)were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

Early removal of chest tube after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery may increase the incidence of pleural effusion after extubation, however, early removal of chest tube can significantly reduce pain after operation, and does not increase the incidence of pneumothorax, cutaneous emphysema, and fever, nor increase the risk of recurrent pleural drainage. Therefore, it is safe and feasible to remove the chest tube early after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery, which is beneficial to reduce the economic burden of patients, shorten the hospitalization days, and enhance recovery after surgery.

Key words: Chest tube, Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), Lung surgery, Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd