Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03): 159-165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.03.008

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of clinical efficacy of three laparoscopic assisted digestive tract reconstruction methods in esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

Dongliang Li 1, Jiajie Zhou 2, Rui Du 2, Feng Wang 2, Guifan Tong 2, Xu Ding 1, Qi Zhang 1, Liuhua Wang 3, Wei Wang 3, Dong Tang 3, Daorong Wang 3 , ( )   

  1. 1. School of Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China
    2. Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, General Surgery Institute of Yangzhou, Subei People′s Hospital, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China
  • Received:2019-12-24 Online:2020-06-30 Published:2020-06-30
  • Contact: Daorong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Daorong, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To study the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy for three different digestive tract reconstruction methods in the treatment of Siewert Ⅱ and Siewert Ⅲ esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (AEG).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the data of 93 Siewert type Ⅱ and Siewert type Ⅲ AEG patients admitted to the Subei People’s Hospital of Jiangsu Province from Jan. 2016 to Dec. 2018. Divided into three groups according to different ways of digestive tract reconstruction. Among them, 31 esophagogastrostomy (group A), 33 double tract reconstruction (group B)and 29 single-canal jejunum interposition (group C). Data analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 software. The perioperative indicators were showed by ( ±s). The measurement data comparison between the three groups was analyzed by single factor analysis of variance. The pairwise comparison between groups was performed by t test. The incidence of postoperative complications was measured by χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The three groups of patients successfully completed the operation without perioperative deaths. The operation time of group B and C was longer than that of group A (P<0.05). Compared with postoperative short-term nutritional status (total serum protein, serum albumin, hemoglobin), group B and C were better than group A (P<0.05). The incidences of reflux esophagitis(RE) were 35.5%, 3.0%, and 0.0%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy in patients with AEG undergoing jejunal interposition (double tract reconstruction, single-canal jejunum interposition) has better short-term postoperative nutritional status and fewer postoperative complications than traditional esophagogastrostomy, especially in terms of RE, jejunal interposition has obvious advantages, which is an ideal way to reconstruct the digestive tract in patients with AEG undergoing proximal gastrectomy.

Key words: Adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction, Laparoscopic assisted, Proximal gastrectomy, Jejunal interposition

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd