切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 140 -145. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2026.03.004

论著

国产单孔机器人辅助妇科手术学习曲线的多中心研究
任常1, 栾冠楠2, 张俊吉1, 刘海元1, 孙智晶1, 孙大为1,()   
  1. 1100730 女性健康与妇产疾病国家临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院/北京协和医院妇产科
    2100020 北京,中国医学科学院医学信息研究所
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-05 出版日期:2026-06-30
  • 通信作者: 孙大为
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2023YFC2413404); 中央高水平医院临床科研专项提升项目(2022-PUMCH-B-086); 单孔腹腔镜手术系统产学研合作项目(FW-HXKT202209160165)

Learning curve of domestic single-port robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: a multicenter study

Chang Ren1, Guannan Luan2, Junji Zhang1, Haiyuan Liu1, Zhijing Sun1, Dawei Sun1,()   

  1. 1National Clinical Research Center for Women′s Health and Gynecological Diseases/Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 100730, China
    2Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2026-06-05 Published:2026-06-30
  • Corresponding author: Dawei Sun
引用本文:

任常, 栾冠楠, 张俊吉, 刘海元, 孙智晶, 孙大为. 国产单孔机器人辅助妇科手术学习曲线的多中心研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 140-145.

Chang Ren, Guannan Luan, Junji Zhang, Haiyuan Liu, Zhijing Sun, Dawei Sun. Learning curve of domestic single-port robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: a multicenter study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 19(03): 140-145.

目的

探讨国产单孔机器人辅助妇科手术的学习曲线特征、影响因素及优化策略,分析不同术式、不同术者的学习曲线拐点。

方法

采用前瞻性、多中心、单臂临床试验设计,于2023年1月至2025年10月在全国6家医院纳入97例采用术锐SR-ENS-600系统行机器人辅助妇科手术的患者,包括卵巢囊肿剔除(32例)、肌瘤剔除(11例)、子宫切除(45例)及子宫内膜癌分期(9例)四种术式。统计对接时间并与文献比较,采用累积和(cumulative sum,CUSUM)方法分析遥操作时间变化趋势,识别熟练度拐点。

结果

本研究中内膜癌分期患者中位年龄低于文献报道(45岁vs. 61岁),肌瘤剔除患者年龄高于文献报道(42.27岁vs. 36.98岁)。设备对接时间学习曲线较短,各医院中位对接时间为3.00~6.00 min,80.4%的病例在5 min内完成对接。不同医院间遥操作学习曲线差异显著:医院1呈现"下降-反弹-再下降"的多模态特征,约25例后进入熟练期;医院5首例即达熟练水平但后续进步有限;医院6呈现最典型学习曲线,于第5~6例进入稳定平台。不同术式学习曲线拐点也存在显著异质性:卵巢囊肿剔除术很快达到熟练;子宫切除术需22例方可达到稳定平台(中位遥操作时间105 min)。

结论

国产单孔机器人妇科手术学习曲线存在显著的术式依赖性和个体异质性。高难度术式需20例以上学习周期,常规术式可在5例内达到稳定。术者既往单孔腹腔镜及多孔机器人经验可显著缩短单孔学习周期。国产术锐SR-ENS-600系统在对接时间、操作时间等指标上与达芬奇SP系统相当,具备良好临床可及性。推广双控制台教学及增强现实辅助反馈技术可帮助优化学习曲线。

Objective

To investigate the learning curve characteristics, influencing factors, and optimization strategies of domestic single-port robotic assisted gynecological surgery, and to analyze proficiency inflection points under different surgical procedures and surgeon backgrounds.

Methods

A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial was conducted at six hospitals across China between Jan. 2023 and Oct. 2025. A total of 97 patients undergoing robotic assisted gynecological surgery using the Shurui SR-ENS-600 system were enrolled, including 32 cases of ovarian cystectomy, 11 cases of myomectomy, 45 cases of hysterectomy, and 9 cases of endometrial cancer staging. Docking time was recorded and compared with literature data. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) method was used to analyze the trend of console time and to identify proficiency inflection points.

Results

In this study, the median age of patients undergoing endometrial cancer staging was lower than that reported in the literature (45 years vs. 61 years), while the age of myomectomy group was higher (42.27 years vs. 36.98 years). The learning curve for docking time was short, with median docking times ranging from 3.00 to 6.00 minutes across hospitals, and 80.4% of cases completed docking within 5 minutes. Significant inter-hospital differences in the learning curves of console time were observed: hospital 1 exhibited a "decline-rebound-decline" pattern, entering the proficiency phase after approximately 25 cases; hospital 5 achieved proficiency from the first case but showed limited subsequent improvement; hospital 6 demonstrated the most typical learning curve, reaching a stable plateau at 5-6 cases. Significant heterogeneity in learning curve inflection points was also found across different surgical procedures: routine procedures (Type 1) achieved proficiency quickly, while difficult procedures (Type 3) required 22 cases to reach a stable plateau (median console time of 105 minutes).

Conclusion

The learning curve for domestic single-port robotic gynecological surgery exhibits significant procedure-dependency and inter-individual heterogeneity. Difficult procedures require more than 20 cases to achieve proficiency, while routine procedures can reach a stable level within 5 cases. Surgeons′ prior experience in single-port laparoscopy and multi-port robotic surgery can significantly shorten the learning cycle for single-port robotic surgery. The domestic Shurui SR-ENS-600 system demonstrates comparable docking time and operative time to the da Vinci SP system, indicating good clinical accessibility and potential for widespread adoption. Dual-console teaching and augmented reality-assisted feedback techniques can help optimize the learning curve.

表1 患者基线特征
表2 各中心设备对接时间
图1 6家医院遥操作手术学习曲线注:红框代表手术时间显著下降或趋于平稳的关键节点
表3 6家医院遥操作手术学习曲线特征
图2 不同术式遥操作手术学习曲线注:红框代表手术时间显著下降或趋于平稳的关键节点
表4 不同术式遥操作手术学习曲线特征
[1]
Capozzi VA, Scarpelli E, Armano G, et al. Update of robotic surgery in benign gynecological pathology: systematic review[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(4): 552.
[2]
Gungorduk K, Kahramanoglu O, Ozdemir IA, et al. Robotic platforms for endometrial cancer treatment: review of the literature[J]. Minerva Med, 2021, 112(1): 47-54.
[3]
Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, et al. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review[J]. BJU Int, 2014, 114(4): 617-629.
[4]
Gala RB, Margulies R, Steinberg A, et al. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(3): 353-361.
[5]
Scornajenghi CM, Conti B, Santarelli V, et al. Da Vinci single-port robotic surgery in Europe: where do we stand? A systematic review[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(23): 8317.
[6]
Chang R, Ping D, Yang S, et al. Effectiveness and safety of SR-ENS-600 endoscopic surgical system in benign and malignant gynecological diseases: a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial with 63 cases[J]. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 210.
[7]
Kim JM, Lee SM, Seol A, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between single-port laparoscopic surgery and da Vinci single-port robotic surgery[J]. J Pers Med, 2023, 13(2): 205.
[8]
谢雨雯. 机器人与常规腹腔镜两种不同术式治疗超重及肥胖子宫内膜癌患者的疗效比较[D]. 赣南医科大学,2025.
[9]
Vizza R, Corrado G, Mancini E, et al. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of robotic single-port hysterectomy (R-SPH) using the da Vinci SP system in low-risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2025, 34(6): 433-440.
[10]
Gardella B, Dominoni M, Gritti A, et al. Analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curve of surgical parameters for robotic hysterectomy: a comparison between multiport versus single- site[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2022, 31(6): 954-961.
[11]
Iavazzo C, Minis EE, Gkegkes ID. Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update[J]. J Robot Surg, 2018, 12(2): 201-213.
[12]
Higuchi N, Kanno K, Onji H, et al. Comparing approaches to benign hysterectomy using conventional multi-port and newer single-port robots: a propensity score matching analysis of surgical outcomes and literature review[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 320.
[13]
Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ozgurel B, et al. Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(3): 384-389.
[14]
Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 120(3): 413-418.
[15]
Li XL, Du DF, Jiang H. The learning curves of robotic and three-dimensional laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer[J]. J Cancer, 2016, 7(15): 2304-2308.
[16]
Mazzone E, Puliatti S, Amato M, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Impact of Proficiency-based Progression Simulation Training on Performance Outcomes[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 274(2): 281-289.
[17]
Margueritte F, Sallée C, Legros M, et al. Description of an initiation program to robotic in vivo gynecological surgery for junior surgeons[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2020, 49(3): 101627.
[18]
Jackson T, Cho EE, Nagatomo K, et al. Teacher and trainee learning together-dual console and the 3 arms[J]. J Surg Educ, 2020, 77(4): 720-722.
[19]
Cizmic A, Häberle F, Preukschas AA, et al. Telestration with augmented reality in minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgery: a scoping review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(12): 8000-8013.
[20]
任常,张可欣,孙大为. 单孔腹腔镜手术机器人技术的进步与挑战[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(5): 262-267.
[21]
任常,张俊吉,谢津,等. 国产单孔机器人手术联合加速康复治疗妇科良性疾病研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(1): 30-35.
[22]
Shin HJ, Yoo HK, Lee JH, et al. Robotic single-port surgery using the da Vinci SP® surgical system for benign gynecologic disease: a preliminary report[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 59(2): 243-247.
[1] 魏利敏, 金鲜珍, 刘萍, 王光辉. 两种微创术式治疗低位直肠癌的学习曲线与近期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 261-266.
[2] 谢学海, 杨尹默. 我国胰头癌腹腔镜手术的现状、存在问题与展望[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 478-482.
[3] 江波, 邓永明, 杨荣, 张士伟, 郭宏骞. 机器人辅助膀胱根治性切除联合体内原位新膀胱术的学习曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 267-272.
[4] 庞名扬, 魏勇, 沈露明, 朱清毅. 运用国产单孔机器人完成经膀胱入路膀胱部分切除术治疗膀胱癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-643.
[5] 江东根, 依力夏提·艾力, 依布拉音江·阿布力克木, 依力盼·依拉木, 冯瑶, 艾尼玩·木拉克, 艾克拜尔江·阿里木. 基层医院单一术者改良单通道腹腔镜下鞘状突环扎术学习曲线及体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 560-565.
[6] 李宝山, 王荫龙. 机器人造口旁疝修补的现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 155-159.
[7] 张清泉, 王世军. 腹腔镜在妇科手术泌尿系统损伤治疗的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 129-131.
[8] 蒋嫒, 缪妙, 陈继明. 经腹壁瘢痕入路妇科单孔腹腔镜手术的理念创建与临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 271-275.
[9] 中国医师协会妇产科医师分会, 中国妇幼保健协会妇科智能医学专业委员会. 远程控制机器人辅助妇科手术中国专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 257-263.
[10] 孙丹, 林汇斯. 妇科手术人体工学研究现状[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 318-320.
[11] 杨黎渝, 刘新阳, 雷永琪, 铁学宏, 刘雨, 梁英健. 腹腔镜手术皮下气肿危险因素与防治[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 636-639.
[12] 唐鑫, 管子龙, 朱爽, 刘方舟, 孙国栋, 王天阳, 石云浩, 齐浩楠, 刘云霄, 王佳琦, 袁子茗, 张巍远, 黄睿. 国产手术机器人与腹腔镜在直肠癌患者术后短期疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 516-525.
[13] 李兴旺, 钟永红, 刘占振, 李月玮, 李庆忠, 姚坤厚, 黄亮. 经肛微创手术(TAMIS)的学习曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 353-358.
[14] 王识程, 狄正林, 刘华, 章军辉. 164例反式肩关节置换术的并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 146-154.
[15] 张际青, 王欣, 唐伟, 刘桂迁, 张家兴, 雷晔, 赵佳晖, 洪保安, 薄予轩, 张宁. 超声引导全程可视化建立经皮肾通道对低年资医师经皮肾镜取石术的效果初探[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(12): 886-891.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?