切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 304 -307. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2023.05.010

综述

机器人手术在妇科领域的应用及展望
王乔, 郑莹()   
  1. 610044 成都,四川大学华西第二医院妇科;610044 成都,出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-30 出版日期:2023-10-30
  • 通信作者: 郑莹
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFC2704103); 四川省科技厅重点研究项目(2023YFS0046); 四川省自然科学基金项目(2022NSFSC1307)

The application and prospect of robotic surgery in gynecology

Qiao Wang, Ying Zheng()   

  1. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan 610041, China.; The Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Received:2023-08-30 Published:2023-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Ying Zheng
引用本文:

王乔, 郑莹. 机器人手术在妇科领域的应用及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 304-307.

Qiao Wang, Ying Zheng. The application and prospect of robotic surgery in gynecology[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(05): 304-307.

在妇科领域,微创外科治疗处于非常重要的地位,这就奠定了机器人手术得以应用和发展的需求基础。机器人手术在妇科领域的适应证和手术原则与相应的普通腹腔镜手术基本相同,可适用于子宫肌瘤切除术、子宫内膜异位症手术、卵巢囊肿手术、子宫全切术、生殖外科、盆底修复以及部分妇科恶性肿瘤的相关手术。相较于普通腹腔镜,机器人手术在追求精准操作或面临更具挑战、更复杂的情况时更能体现出其价值和优势。未来,机器人妇科手术可能将在超远程手术、人工智能、单孔手术、专科机器人等方面继续带来创新和变革。

Minimally invasive surgery plays an extremely important role in the field of gynecology, which lays a solid foundation for the application and development of robotic surgery. Robot surgery has basically the same indications and surgical principles in the field of gynecology as those of conventional laparoscopic surgery. It can be applied to surgical treatment for uterine fibroid, endometriosis, adnexal mass, and gynecologic oncology. Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery better demonstrates its advantages in pursuing precise operations or dealing with more challenging and complex situations. In the future, robotic gynecological surgery may bring further innovation and revolution in areas such as ultra remote surgery, artificial intelligence, single-port surgery, and specialized robots.

图1 机器人腹腔镜下单孔免举宫广泛性子宫切除术注:A.使用扎带悬吊子宫;B.切除子宫骶骨韧带;C.切除膀胱宫颈韧带;D.缝合封闭阴道后切开。
图2 机器人腹腔镜下单孔淋巴结切除术注:A.清扫盆腔淋巴结;B.切除腹主动脉旁淋巴结;C.切除增大的肾静脉旁淋巴结;D.高位清扫腹主动脉旁淋巴结。
图3 单孔机器人腹腔镜下卵巢畸胎瘤剥除术注:A、B.剥除畸胎瘤;C、D.缝合成形卵巢。
1
Wang T, Tang H, Xie Z, et al. Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2018, 27(5):249-264.
2
Orlando M, Kollikonda S, Hackett L, et al. Non-hysteroscopic myomectomy and fertility outcomes: a systematic review[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(3):598-618.e1.
3
Pitter MC, Srouji SS, Gargiulo AR, et al. Fertility and symptom relief following robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. Obstet Gynecol Int, 2015:967568.
4
Brunes M, Johannesson U, Häbel H, et al. Effects of obesity on peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus conventional hysterectomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(2):228-236.
5
Brunes M, Johannesson U, Häbel H, et al. Peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients with endometriosis undergoing hysterectomy[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2022, 272:104-109.
6
Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X, et al. Laparoscopy vs. robotic surgery for endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 107(4):996-1002.e3.
7
Nezhat CR, Stevens A, Balassiano E, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(1):40-44.
8
Lim CS, Mowers EL, Mahnert N, et al. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Conversion to Laparotomy of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128(6):1295-1305.
9
Siesto G, Ieda N, Rosati R, et al. Robotic surgery for deep endometriosis: a paradigm shift[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2014, 10(2):140-146.
10
Moawad GN, Tyan P, Abi Khalil ED, et al. Multidisciplinary resection of deeply infiltrative endometriosis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(3):389-390.
11
Mosbrucker C, Somani A, Dulemba J. Visualization of endometriosis: comparative study of 3-dimensional robotic and 2-dimensional laparoscopic endoscopes[J]. J Robot Surg, 2018, 12(1):59-66.
12
Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2010, 17(6):739-748.
13
Madhuri TK, Butler-Manuel S. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 216(6):619.
14
Chaowawanit W, Campbell V, Wilson E, et al. Comparison between laparoscopic and robotic surgery for sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer using indocyanine green and near infra-red fluorescence imaging[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2021, 41(4):642-646.
15
Shah CA, Beck T, Liao JB, et al. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2017, 28(6):e82.
16
Di Donna MC, Giallombardo V, Lo Balbo G, et al. Conventional laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted aortic lymph-nodal staging for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(12):3332.
17
Gallotta V, Certelli C, Oliva R, et al. Robotic surgery in ovarian cancer[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2023, 90:102391.
18
Shi C, Gao Y, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2019, 17(1):162.
19
Bebia V, Gil-Moreno A, Hernández A, et al. Robot-assisted extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated with fewer surgical complications: a post hoc analysis of the STELLA-2 randomized trial[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(12):2004-2012.e1.
20
Chen Y, Zheng Y, Yang F. Primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with isolated enlarged para-aortic lymph node by robotic transumbilical single port approach[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2023, 18:ijgc-2023-004729.
21
Wang L, Deng JY, Li KP, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy[J]. J Robot Surg, 2023, 17(4):1319-1328.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[4] 谢作都, 邓侠兴. 达芬奇机器人在胰腺外科中的研究应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 346-348.
[5] 钟文涛, 吕远, 孙亮, 袁强, 聂玉辉, 东星, 陈光, 陈纲, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜-胃镜联合手术与开腹手术处理胃间质瘤的临床疗效对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 164-166.
[6] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[7] 唐虹, 周奇, 欧阳晓玲, 王永峰, 华宇, 郝小白, 李林霞. 腹膜外无张力吊带子宫悬吊术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-319.
[8] 杨万荣, 任治坤, 时新颍. 沙丁胺醇雾化吸入脾多肽治疗AECOPD的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 609-612.
[9] 刘洋, 方芳, 李莹, 李青, 陆倩, 魏善闯, XIAOMING GUAN, 张春花. 国产单孔手术机器人辅助vNOTES治疗妇科良性疾病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 234-238.
[10] 危用洋, 黄俊甫, 辛万鹏, 易思清, 涂书举, 方康, 李勇, 肖卫东. 三种术式治疗胰腺颈体部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 515-519.
[11] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[12] 黄福秀, 张宁宁, 李晨阳, 李淑玲, 陈超. 单纯电切、单纯电凝与电凝电切术对扁平肠息肉疗效及不良事件发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[13] 徐清华, 张振林, 李浩. 清胰汤联合乌司他丁对急性胰腺炎患者肠道功能恢复及炎性因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 253-257.
[14] 王楠钧, 马燕, 李隆松, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 毕雅维, 苏松, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 不同年龄段胃低级别上皮内瘤变患者内镜下射频消融术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 238-242.
[15] 徐森胤, 黄斌, 郭绍锋, 王涵. 超声造影引导下关节囊内注射治疗老年粘连性关节囊炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 24-27.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?