切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04): 211 -216. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.04.004

论著 上一篇    下一篇

诺舒子宫内膜去除术治疗异常子宫出血的远期疗效分析
赵辉 1, 李海霞 1, 杨保军 1, 冯力民 1 , ( )   
  1. 1. 100070 北京,首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-11 出版日期:2021-10-08
  • 通信作者: 冯力民

Long term efficacy analysis of NovaSure endometrial ablation for the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding

Hui Zhao 1, Haixia Li 1, Baojun Yang 1, Limin Feng 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Deparment of Obestetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2021-07-11 Published:2021-10-08
  • Corresponding author: Limin Feng
目的

评估应用诺舒子宫内膜去除术治疗异常子宫出血(abnormal uterine bleeding,AUB)的远期临床疗效及术后再次干预情况。

方法

对2011年1月至2018年12月因AUB于首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院接受诺舒子宫内膜去除术的患者进行随访,观察患者术后的闭经率、有效率、痛经缓解率、满意率、并发症、再次干预情况。

结果

285例患者中排除84例不符合纳入标准或资料缺失的患者,最终201例患者纳入临床研究,随访时间12~106个月,中位数随访时间53(36,79)个月。患者术后1、2、3、4、5~8年时间点,闭经率分别为67.66%、70.27%、76.32%、75.83%、78.82%,有效率分别为96.02%、95.68%、95.36%、95.00%、92.94%,痛经缓解率分别为83.51%、80.46%、86.67%、77.97%、84.85%,满意率分别为90.55%、88.65%、90.79%、87.50%、88.24%,并发症发生率分别为2.49%、3.78%、5.26%、6.67%、8.24%,再次干预率分别为6.47%、10.27%、14.47%、15.00%、18.82%,子宫切除率分别为1.49%、3.24%、5.26%、7.50%、8.24%。术后累计再次干预治疗33例,包括保留子宫的保守性手术20例、全子宫切除手术13例。

结论

诺舒子宫内膜去除术治疗AUB远期疗效显著,尤其适用于合并严重内、外科疾病或急性严重的子宫出血的患者。患者再次的子宫出血和(或)下腹痛问题是治疗失败、再次干预的主要原因,这可能与术后残留或异位的子宫内膜有关。

Objective

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and secondary postoperative intervention of NovaSure endometrial ablation in the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding(AUB).

Methods

From Jan. 2011 to Dec. 2018, AUB patients who underwent NovaSure endometrial ablation in Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University were followed up. The postoperative amenorrhea rate, effective rate, dysmenorrhea remission rate, patient satisfaction, complications and reintervention were analyzed.

Results

There were 285 AUB patients received NovaSure endometrial removal, after strict screening, 84 patients were excluded, 201 patients were finally selected for the clinical study. The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 106 months and the median follow-up time was 53 months. At the time points of 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5-8 years after NovaSure operation, the amenorrhea rate was 67.66%, 70.27%, 76.32%, 75.83%, 78.82%; the effective rate was 96.02%, 95.68%, 95.36%, 95.00%, 92.94%; the remission rate of dysmenorrhea was 83.51%, 80.46%, 86.67%, 77.97%, 84.85%; the satisfaction rate was 90.55%, 88.65%, 90.79%, 87.50%, 88.24%; the incidence of complications was 2.49%、3.78%、5.26%、6.67%、8.24%. The re-intervention rate was 6.47%, 10.27%, 14.47%, 15.00%, 18.82%, respectively; the hysterectomy rate was 1.49%, 3.24%, 5.26%, 7.50%, 8.24% respectively. There were 33 cases of postoperative intervention. The re-intervention therapies include conservative operation with uterus preservation and hysterectomy. A total of 33 cases were re-intervened, including 20 cases of conservative surgery and 13 cases of total hysterectomy.

Conclusions

NovaSure Endometrial ablation has significant long-term effects in the treatment of AUB, especially for patients with severe internal or surgical diseases or acute severe massive hemorrhage. Recurring uterine bleeding and(or) pain after operation are the main reasons for treatment failure and re-intervention, which may be related to the residual or ectopic of endometrium after operation.

图1 诺舒子宫内膜去除装置
图2 诺舒手术前后宫腔形态
图3 诺舒子宫内膜去除术后,内膜粘附在网状电极上一并取出
表1 201例异常子宫出血患者一般临床资料
图4 异常子宫出血患者术后各时间点的闭经率、有效率、痛经缓解率、满意率
图5 异常子宫出血患者术后各时间点的并发症率、再次干预率及子宫切除率
1
Munro MG.Endometrial ablation[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol201846:120-139.
2
Higham JM, O′Brien PM, Shaw RW. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol199097(8):734-739.
3
Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS.The two figo systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions[J]. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics2018143(3):393-408.
4
Gimpelson RJ. Ten-year literature review of global endometrial ablation with the NovaSure ® de Vice[J]. Int J Womens Health20146:269-280.
5
Clark TJ, Samuel N, Malick S, et al. Bipolar radiofrequency compared with thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the office: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol2011117(1):109-118.
6
Wyatt S, Banahan T, Tang Y, et al. Effect of radiofrequency endometrial ablation on dysmenorrhea[J]. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2016, 23:1163-1166.
7
Bofill Rodriguez M, Lethaby A, Grigore M, et al. Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 1:CD001501.
8
Liu Q, Li XL, Liu JJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding in pre- and postmenopausal women with liver cirrhosis[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res201642:1753-1760.
9
Cooper J, Gimpelson RJ.Summary of safety and effectiveness data from fda: a valuable source of information on the performance of global endometrial ablation devices[J]. The Journal of reproductive medicine200449(4):267-273.
10
Wortman M, Cholkeri A, McCausland AM, et al. Late-onset endometrial ablation failure--etiology, treatment, and prevention[J]. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology2015, 22(3):323-331.
11
Lybol C, Coelen S, Hamelink A, et al. Predictors of long-term novasure endometrial ablation failure[J]. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology2018, 25:1255-1259.
12
Onoglu A, Taskin O, Inal M, et al. Comparison of the long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after endometrial rollerball ablation and resection: a prospective randomized trial[J]. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology200714(1):39-42.
13
Beelen P, Reinders IMA, Scheepers WFW, et al. Factors for the failure of endometrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Obstetrics and gynecology2019134(6):1269-1281.
14
Mengerink BB, Wurff AA, Haar JF, et al.Effect of undiagnosed deep adenomyosis after failed NovaSure endometrial ablation[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2015, 22:239-244.
15
张露平,尚宏瑜,李文君,等.异常子宫出血 NovaSure子宫内膜去除术后再干预的危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)202013(4):229-232.
16
Maia HJ, Maltez A, Coelho G, et al. Insertion of mirena after endometrial resection in patients with adenomyosis[J]. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists2003, 10(4):512-516.
17
Zheng J, Xia E, Li TC, et al. Comparison of combined transcervical resection of the endometrium and levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine system treatment versus levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine system treatment alone in women with adenomyosis: a prospective clinical trial[J]. J Reprod Med201358(7-8):285-290.
18
Zhao H,,Yang BJ,,Feng LM,et al.Comparison of combined bipolar radiofrequency impedance-controlled endometrial ablation with levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation alone in women with abnormal uterine bleeding[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol202027(3):774-780.
[1] 董虹, 王燕. NovaSure子宫内膜去除术治疗异常子宫出血临床研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(02): 261-264.
[2] 李荔, 陈文静, 李屹, 罗喜平. 微波子宫内膜去除术中高频微波对组织的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(01): 27-32.
[3] 张露平, 尚宏瑜, 李文君, 赵辉, 郭蕾, 张生澎, 冯力民. 异常子宫出血NovaSure子宫内膜去除术后再干预的危险因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(04): 229-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要