3D-CTBA联合Hookwire定位在胸腔镜肺段切除术中的应用

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.05.003

目的

探讨三维支气管血管重建(three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography, 3D-CTBA)技术联合Hookwire定位在电视胸腔镜手术(video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery，VATS)肺段切除术中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年12月至2020年2月江阴市人民医院胸心外科48例行VATS肺段切除术患者的临床资料。所有患者术前均用Mimics 20.0软件行3D-CTBA重建肺部解剖结构，明确肺结节所在肺段及靶段支气管、血管走行，观察有无变异，决定术中所需切断和保留的支气管及动(静)脉，制订个性化手术方案；在CT引导下行Hookwire定位后入手术室行VATS解剖性肺段切除术。

结果

所有患者均未发现定位针移位和脱落并顺利完成手术，无中转开胸。Hookwire定位时间(19.71±3.94)min，发生气胸5例；手术时间(109.67±17.21)min，术中出血量(65.42±21.62)ml，术后胸管置管(4.13±1.26)d，术后胸腔引流量(548.33±228.78)ml，术后住院时间(6.25±1.48 ) d。围手术期无严重并发症，无死亡病例。

结论

术前3D-CTBA技术联合CT引导下Hookwire定位有助于术者进行安全、精准的解剖性肺段切除，具有良好的临床应用价值。

关键词: 三维重建, 支气管血管成像, Hookwire, 电视胸腔镜手术, 肺段切除术

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography combined with Hookwire localization in thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

Methods

The clinical data of 48 patients undergoing thoracoscopic segmentectomy from Dec. 2018 to Feb. 2020 in our department were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All the patients underwent 3D-CTBA using the Mimics software to show the anatomy of pulmonary segments, in order to make clear the accurate location of the nodule and explicit the courses and variations of bronchi and blood vessels. So that the personalized operation scheme including the target bronchi and blood vessels to be amputated can be made before operation. All patients were treated with Hookwire localization needle under CT guidance and then thoracoscopic segmentectomy were performed.

Results

None of Hookwires dislodged or displaced during the transport to the operation room and the surgeries were successfully completed in 48 patients without a transfer to open procedure. The mean procedure time for the CT-guided Hookwire localization was (19.71±3.94)min, 5 patients of them had the pneumothorax. The mean operation time was (109.67±17.21)min, the mean intraoperative blood loss was (65.42±21.62)ml, mean thoracic tube drainage time was (4.13±1.26)d and postoperative thoracic drainage was (548.33±228.78)ml. The average postoperative hospitalization was (6.25±1.48) d. There were no serious complications or death during the perioperative period.

Conclusions

The application of preoperative 3D-CTBA combined with CT-guided Hookwire localization is helpful for safe and accurate anatomical thoracoscopic segmentectomy, which has productive clinical application value.

Key words: 3D reconstruction, Bronchography and angiography, Hookwire, Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, Segmentectomy

图1 3D-CTBA联合Hookwire定位应用示意

表1 48例胸腔镜肺段切除术患者切除的肺段部位(例)

所在肺段	右肺	左肺
S1	4	1
S2	5	0
S3	8	0
S1＋2	0	5
S1＋2＋3	0	7
S4＋5	0	2
S6	5	7
S7＋8	1	1
S8	1	1
S9	1	0
S10	2	1
S9＋10	1	0

表1 48例胸腔镜肺段切除术患者切除的肺段部位(例)

所在肺段	右肺	左肺
S1	4	1
S2	5	0
S3	8	0
S1＋2	0	5
S1＋2＋3	0	7
S4＋5	0	2
S6	5	7
S7＋8	1	1
S8	1	1
S9	1	0
S10	2	1
S9＋10	1	0

1	Hu L, Gao J, Chen C, et al. Comparison between the application of microcoil and hookwire for localizing pulmonary nodules[J]. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(8): 4036-4043.
2	谢冬，陈昶，朱余明，等. 单孔胸腔镜手术的现状与展望[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(2): 73-76.
3	虞桂平，黄斌，糜烨东，等. 完全胸腔镜下解剖性肺段切除术治疗肺小结节近远期疗效及安全性[J]. 广东医学，2019, 40(13): 1872-1875.
4	Yang F, Zhao H, Sui X, et al. Comparative study on preoperative localization techniques using microcoil and hookwire by propensity score matching[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2020, 11(6): 1386-1395.
5	Klinkenberg TJ, Dinjens L, Wolf RFE, et al. CT-guided percutaneous hookwire localization increases the efficacy and safety of VATS for pulmonary nodules[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2017, 115(7): 898-904.
6	孙超，陆世春，王霄霖，等. 三维重建技术在胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志，2019, 19(2): 115-117.
7	中华医学会，中华医学会肿瘤学分会，中华医学会杂志社. 中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2018版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志，2018, 40(12): 935-964.
8	Sato M. Precise sublobar lung resection for small pulmonary nodules: localization and beyond[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 68(7): 684-691.
9	Manouvelou S, Mosa E, Tolia M, et al. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided localization of pulmonary nodules with hook wire prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. J BUON, 2019, 24(1):267-272.
10	Li H, Liu Y, Ling BC, et al. Efficacy of thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy for small pulmonary nodules[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2020, 8(11): 2227-2234.
11	彭磊磊，赵楠楠，于奇，等. Hookwire定位下单孔胸腔镜切除孤立性肺小结节63例报告[J]. 临床肺科杂志，2019, 24(8): 1480-1483.
12	Zhang J, Zhao H, Lv L, et al. Uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2020, 36(2): 182-186.
13	Cosgun T, Kaba E, Ayalp K, et al. An antiquated contraindication for minimally invasive lung surgery: no place to staple the bronchus[J]. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg, 2019, 27(4): 521-525.
14	黄艾，瞿越，余政，等. 三维重建技术在胸腔镜精准肺段切除中的临床应用[J]. 中国医师杂志，2019, 21(11): 1609-1612.
15	Nakazawa S, Shimizu K, Mogi A, et al. VATS segmentectomy: past, present, and future[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 66(2):81-90.
16	Walker R, Deppen S, Smith G, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging of indeterminate pulmonary nodules and lung cancer[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): e0171301. DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0171301.
17	Zhao Y, Xuan Y, Song J, et al. A novel technique for identification of the segments based on pulmonary artery plane combined with oxygen diffusing discrepancy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(12): 5427-5432.
18	Suzuki K, Saji H, Aokage K, et al. Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: safety results of a randomized trial[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 158(3): 895-907.
19	江贤亮，徐美清，徐世斌，等. 胸腔镜肺段切除治疗亚厘米肺结节[J]. 中国微创外科杂志，2018, 18(6): 494-496.
20	杨逸凡，王祖义. 三维CT支气管血管重建技术在胸腔镜精准肺段切除术中的应用[J]. 当代医药论丛，2020, 18(7): 20-22.
21	王礼同，汤晓明，黄华，等. 电视胸腔镜手术前CT引导下亚甲蓝和/或Hookwire定位肺磨玻璃结节[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2019, 35(8): 1220-1223.
22	Li A, Chan S, Thung KH. Pre-operative CT localization for patients with subsolid opacities expecting video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery-single center experience of fluorescent iodized emulsion and hook-wire localization technique[J]. Br J Radiol, 2020, 93(1109): 20190938. DOI：10.1259/bjr.20190938.
23	李波，王宜主，胡彬，等. 三维影像重建支气管、血管引导胸腔镜精准肺段、肺亚段切除段间区域结节的策略探讨[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗，2019, 32(8): 711-717.

[1]	冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[2]	唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[3]	张云浩, 何玲敏, 孙旭, 马洪贵, 刘磊, 张见荣, 梅傲冰. 基于CT的三维重建模型及术前虚拟手术在输尿管狭窄腹腔镜手术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 372-379.
[4]	李伟, 宋子健, 邓龙昕, 赖衍成, 卢晓乐, 吉进, 陈锐. 三维重建技术在腹膜后肿瘤临床教学中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 162-167.
[5]	李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[6]	周子健, 吴忠. CT在泌尿系结石诊疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 299-302.
[7]	胡航, 陈婷婷, 孙健, 孙云浩, 仇丽敏. 三维重建技术在单操作孔胸腔镜肺段切除术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 310-312.
[8]	陆祥, 陈卫荣. 单孔胸腔镜肺段切除术与单孔胸腔镜肺楔形切除术在直径2 cm以下肺磨玻璃结节的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 95-98.
[9]	李晓亮, 樊立茂, 郭朝卫, 王新刚. 单孔胸腔镜下肺段切除与肺亚段切除治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 845-848.
[10]	许喜乐, 徐敏. 达芬奇机器人辅助肺段切除术治疗ⅠA期NSCLC的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 658-660.
[11]	王冲, 闫东杰, 龚昌帆, 韩毅. 三维重建辅助胸腔镜胸膜剥脱术治疗包裹性脓胸的思路和技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 164-167.
[12]	赵田, 张淼, 武文斌, 张辉, 王晓靖, 张昊. 单孔胸腔镜肺段与肺亚段切除术的学习曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 158-164.
[13]	李丹妹, 许鉴. 基于CT三维重建技术的正常关节盂宽度和高度关系及形态学研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 69-74.
[14]	马木提江·木尔提扎, 汪永新, 阿西木江·阿西尔, 姜彦文, 秦虎. 多模态三维影像融合技术在颅内功能区病变手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 302-307.
[15]	贾卓奇, 李硕, 陈健, 张广健, 付军科. 新辅助治疗后胸腹腔镜下Ivor-Lewis食管胃结合部腺癌根治术1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 111-116.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography combined with Hookwire localization in thoracoscopic segmentectomy

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography combined with Hookwire localization in thoracoscopic segmentectomy