切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 241 -244. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.04.013

所属专题: 文献

短篇论著

腹腔镜切口疝修补术联合生物补片治疗巨大切口疝的疗效观察
戴伟钢1, 魏丹2, 袁玉杰1, 谭进富1, 左继东1, 冯伟东1, 赵琼云1, 谭敏1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院胃肠外科中心 疝与腹壁外科
    2. 528458 中山,广东药科大学医药化工学院
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-04 出版日期:2018-08-30
  • 通信作者: 谭敏
  • 基金资助:
    广东省公益研究和能力建设专项资金资助项目(2016A010103038)

The effect of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy combined with biological mesh in the treatment of giant incisional hernia

Weigang Dai1, Dan Wei2, Yujie Yuan1, Jinfu Tan1, Jidong Zuo1, Weidong Feng1, Qiongyun Zhao1, Min Tan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
    2. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Zhongshan 528458, China
  • Received:2018-03-04 Published:2018-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Min Tan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tan Min, Email:
引用本文:

戴伟钢, 魏丹, 袁玉杰, 谭进富, 左继东, 冯伟东, 赵琼云, 谭敏. 腹腔镜切口疝修补术联合生物补片治疗巨大切口疝的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(04): 241-244.

Weigang Dai, Dan Wei, Yujie Yuan, Jinfu Tan, Jidong Zuo, Weidong Feng, Qiongyun Zhao, Min Tan. The effect of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy combined with biological mesh in the treatment of giant incisional hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 11(04): 241-244.

目的

探讨腹腔镜切口疝修补术联合生物补片治疗巨大切口疝的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年12月在中山大学附属第一医院接受腹腔镜切口疝修补术联合生物补片治疗的7例巨大切口疝患者的临床资料。

结果

手术时间70~390 min。疼痛程度的视觉模拟评分在术后24 h、术后3 d及术后7 d分别为(4.8±0.69)分、(4.1±0.89)分、(3.9±1.10)分。术后肛门首次排气时间(2.2±0.95)d,术后住院时间(18.2±9.2)d。术后发热3例(42.9%,3/7),腹腔感染2例(28.6%,2/7),切口脂肪液化3例(42.9%,3/7),感染2例(28.6%,2/7),腹壁血清肿2例(28.6%,2/7),术后粘连性肠梗阻2例(28.6%,2/7),补片下积液2例(28.6%,2/7),肺部感染1例(14.3%,1/7)。所有患者获得随访,中位随访时间36个月;术后有腹壁慢性疼痛或不适感2例(28.6%,2/7),术后24个月复发1例(14.3%,1/7)。

结论

腹腔镜切口疝修补术联合生物补片治疗巨大切口疝是安全有效的,但其长期疗效需要进一步观察。

Objective

The purpose of this article is to explore the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic hernia repair combined with biological patch in the treatment of giant incisional hernia.

Methods

The clinical data of seven patients with giant incisional hernia treated by laparoscopic incisional hernia repair combined with biological patch in our hospital from Jan. 2014 to Dec. 2016 were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

The operation time was from 70-390 minutes. The VAS pain scores on 24 hours operatively, POD3 and POD7 were(4.8±0.69), (4.1±0.89) and (3.9±1.10) respectively. The postoperative anal exhaust time was (2.2±0.95)days. The average postoperative hospitalization time was (18.2±9.2)days. The postoperative complications included three cases of fever (42.9%, 3/7), two cases of abdominal infection (28.6%, 2/7), three cases of fat liquefaction of incision (42.9%, 3/7), two cases of wound infection (28.6%, 2/7), two cases of abdominal wall seroma (28.6%, 2/7), two cases of adhesive intestinal obstruction after operation (28.6%, 2/7), two cases were filled by effusion (28.6%, 2/7), one case of pulmonary infection (14.3%, 1/7). All patients were followed up for an average of 36 months. Postoperative abdominal pain or discomfort occurred in two cases (28.6%, 2/7), and one case(14.3%, 1/7) recurred 24 months after operation.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy combined with biological patch is safe and effective for the treatment of huge incisional hernia, but its long-term effect needs further observation.

图1 腹腔镜IPOM技术联合生物补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝
1
Dietz UA, MenzelS, Lock J, et al. The treatment of incisional hernia[J]. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 2018, 115(3):31-37.
2
Franklin M, Russek K. Use of porcine small intestine submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up assessment[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(5):1693-1694.
3
Franklin ME, Gonzalez JJ, Glass JL. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-up[J]. Hernia the Journal of Hernias & Abdominal Wall Surgery, 2004, 8(3):186-189.
4
Atema JJ, Vries FE, Boermeester MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the repair of potentially contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects[J]. American Journal of Surgery, 2016, 212(5):982-995.
5
Smart NJ, MarshallM, Daniels IR. Biological meshes: a review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs[J]. Surgeon, 2012, 10(3):159-171.
6
刘玉辉,安鲁彪,史冠军,等. 腹部切口疝修补术应用脱细胞真皮基质生物补片的疗效[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015,9(4):309-311.
7
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 腹壁切口疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 8(3):201-203.
8
唐健雄,郑民华,田文,等. 切口疝腹腔镜手术的规范化操作专家共识[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1):1-7.
9
占小莉,王跃东. 腹腔镜腹壁疝和切口疝修补术[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 8(1):5-7.
10
Franklin ME, Trevino JM, Portillo G, et al. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(9):1941-1946.
11
Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, et al. Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model[J]. Journal of Surgical Research, 2001, 99(2):282-287.
12
Ueno T, Pickett LC, Sg DLF, et al. Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2004, 8(1):109-112.
13
Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, et al. Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia[J]. Archives of Surgery, 2005, 140(6):560-562.
14
Majumder A, Winder JS, Wen Y, et al. Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs[J]. Surgery, 2016, 160(4):828-838.
15
Gupta A, Zahriya K, Mullens PL, et al. Ventral herniorrhaphy: experience with two different biosynthetic mesh materials, surgisis and alloderm[J]. Hernia, 2006, 10(5):419-425.
16
Treviño JM, Jr FM, Berghoff KR, et al. Preliminary results of a two-layered prosthetic repair for recurrent inguinal and ventral hernias combining open and laparoscopic techniques[J]. Hernia the Journal of Hernias & Abdominal Wall Surgery, 2006, 10(3):253-257.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?