切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 285 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.05.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

免打结线在双镜联合治疗结直肠息肉中的应用
黄凯斌1, 郭春华1, 朱畅1, 钟克力1, 夏利刚1,(), 潘凯1   
  1. 1. 518000 深圳,暨南大学第二临床医学院(深圳市人民医院)胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-06 出版日期:2016-10-30
  • 通信作者: 夏利刚

Application of knotless self-retaining suture in the treatment of colorectal polyps with endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures

Kaibin Huang1, Chunhua Guo1, Chang Zhu1, Keli Zhong1, Ligang Xia1,(), Kai Pan1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shenzhen People′s Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2016-07-06 Published:2016-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Ligang Xia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xia Ligang, Email:
引用本文:

黄凯斌, 郭春华, 朱畅, 钟克力, 夏利刚, 潘凯. 免打结线在双镜联合治疗结直肠息肉中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(05): 285-289.

Kaibin Huang, Chunhua Guo, Chang Zhu, Keli Zhong, Ligang Xia, Kai Pan. Application of knotless self-retaining suture in the treatment of colorectal polyps with endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(05): 285-289.

目的

探讨免打结倒刺线在双镜联合治疗结直肠息肉中的可行性、安全性及应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2013年4月至2016年3月,暨南大学第二临床医学院深圳市人民医院胃肠外科施行的59例腹腔镜联合术中肠镜结直肠息肉局部切除并一期缝合的患者,根据术中缝合线不同分组:免打结倒刺线组(34例),普通可吸收线组(25例)。分别比较两组的一般情况、术中肠管缝合时间、术中出血量、术后肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间及术后吻合口漏等并发症发生率等指标差异是否有统计学意义。

结果

两组的年龄分布、性别比例、术中出血量、术后肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间及术后吻合口漏等并发症发生率等各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05);但两组的术中肠管缝合时间比较,A组的缝合时间明显少于B组[13.96±3.19) min vs (25.68±10.72) min],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

免打结倒刺线在腹腔镜联合术中肠镜治疗结直肠息肉中是安全可行的。腹腔镜联合术中肠镜治疗结直肠息肉中,免打结倒刺线相对于普通可吸收线可以缩短术中肠管缝合时间,具有不增加术后吻合口漏发生率及其他并发症等特点。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility, safety and clinical efficacies of the combinations of the endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures was employed in the treatment of colorectal polyps.

Methods

From Apr. 2013 to Mar. 2016, 59 cases of laparoscopic partial colonoscopy colorectal polyp patients with partial resection and a stitch were performed in the second clinical medical college, Jinan University, Shenzhen people′s hospital of gastrointestinal surgery: knotless self-retaining suture was used in 34 cases(knotless self-retaining suture was used group), and traditional absorbable suture was used in 25 cases (traditional absorbable suture was used group). Respectively to compare two groups of general situation, time of interpretative suture intestines, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage and other indicators whether there is a statistically significant difference.

Results

Two groups in the age distribution, sex ratio, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospitalization days and the incidence of postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage and there were no statistically significant difference between the indicators(P>0.05). However, the two groups had difference was statistically significant on the suture time , the time of interpretative suture intestines in group A is less than that of group B [13.96±3.19) min vs (25.68±10.72) min](P<0.05).

Conclusions

Knotless agnail line in laparoscopic combined intraoperative colonoscopy in the treatment of colorectal polyps is safe and feasible. In the laparoscopic intraoperative colonoscopy in the treatment of colorectal polyps, knot agnail line relative to the general can absorb line can shorten the time of interpretative suture intestines, but also not increase the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and other complications, etc.

表1 结直肠息肉患者的两组术中及术后情况比较
图1 单向免打结倒刺线
图2 双向免打结倒刺线
1
Bettington M, Walker N, Clouston A, et al. The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current concepts and challenges [J]. Histopathology, 2013, 62 (3): 367-386.
2
Gimenogarcía AZ, de Ganzo ZA, Sosa AJ, et al. Incidence and predictors of postpolypectomy bleeding in colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm [J]. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2012, 24 (5): 520-526.
3
郑民华,马君俊. 腹腔镜右半结肠完整结肠系膜切除术 [J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2015,8 (1): 1-3.
4
沈晓卉,陆爱国,马君俊,等. 结直肠良、恶性息肉微创治疗的临床研究 [J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2008, 8 (12): 1064-1067.
5
苏忠,杨奕,李高岩,等. 结肠镜引导下腹腔镜治疗结肠息肉32例 [J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2011, 11 (2): 147-148.
6
Hemal AK, Agarwal MM, Babbar P. Impact of newer unidirectional and bidirectional barbed suture on vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its comparison with polyglecaprone-25 suture: an initial experience [J]. International Urology & Nephrology, 2012, 44 (1): 125-132.
7
Amend B, Müller O, Bedke J, et al. Biomechanical proof of barbed sutures for the efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty [J]. Journal of Endourology, 2012, 26 (5): 540-544.
8
王江华,吴黎明,刘小波,等. Quill免打结缝合线与薇乔线在腹腔镜下胆总管连续缝合的应用比较 [J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2014, 14 (6): 503-505.
9
潘凯. 腹腔镜胃肠外科手术学 [M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2010: 114-210.
10
Anderloni A, Jovani M, Hassan C, et al. Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy [J]. Clinical & Experimental Gastroenterology, 2014, 7 (1): 285-296.
11
Kouklakis G, Mpoumponaris A, Gatopoulou A, et al. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: a prospective, randomized study [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 (12): 2732-2737.
12
Shaukat A, Mongin SJ, Geisser MS, et al. Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013, 369 (12): 1106-1114.
13
周平红,姚礼庆,徐美东,等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗大肠巨大平坦息肉18例分析 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2007, 27 (8): 633-636.
14
郑民华. 腹腔镜技术的现状与展望 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2010,39 (3): 164-166.
15
Lee SW, Nomura E, Tokuhara T, et al. Laparoscopic technique and initial experience with knotless, unidirectional barbed suture closure for staple-conserving, delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy after distal gastrectomy [J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2011, 213 (6): 39-45.
16
Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI. The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy [J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2008, 15 (5): 621-623.
17
Neubauer NL, Schink PJ, Pant A, et al. A comparison of 2 methods of vaginal cuff closure during robotic hysterectomy [J]. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, 2013, 120 (1): 99-101.
18
Jeon SH, Jung S, Son HS, et al. The unidirectional barbed suture for renorrhaphy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Stanford experience [J]. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Part A, 2013, 23 (6): 521-525.
[1] 蓝青楠, 俞金龙, 余捷, 何首华, 翁起宁, 罗桂芝, 邹琦, 邹兆伟. 改良两针法连续缝合在回肠单腔造口术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 278-281.
[2] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[3] 郑尧帆, 林方德, 史方义, 林师佈. 改良腹腔镜-内镜双镜联合手术与腹腔镜辅助内镜下切除术治疗早期胃癌的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 267-270.
[4] 卢国平, 廖科诚, 张志甫. 俯卧分腿位一期经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性铸型结石的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 249-253.
[5] 于琳琳, 金黑鹰. 结直肠息肉发病风险预测模型构建及其临床价值[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 409-414.
[6] 金磊, 吴炯. 肛瘘继发直肠息肉误诊病例报道一例[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(03): 299-301.
[7] 王玲, 钟薇, 潘俊玲, 李斌. 精细化护理对结直肠息肉患者康复期胃肠道恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(06): 584-588.
[8] 丁一鸣, 白鹏, 张蕾, 李欣, 杨雪松, 曾冉冉, 范雪, 王妍, 王丽, 林香春. 结肠镜下结直肠息肉及腺瘤检出率的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(10): 989-994.
[9] 牟一, 张力凡, 胡兵. 圈套器冷切除术在结直肠息肉应用中的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 253-258.
[10] 胡兵. 内镜下结直肠小息肉冷切术[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 216-216.
[11] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国结直肠息肉冷切专家共识(2023年,杭州)[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 73-82.
[12] 卓宪华, 陈俊榕, 卢祎, 孙家琛, 刘亚男, 李初俊. 非放大内镜下结直肠病变的国际NICE分型判断结直肠息肉的应用及学习曲线[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(03): 105-110.
[13] 虎金朋, 杨珍, 牛敏, 张雪, 张玲, 莫丽蓉, 周燕, 曹贞子, 白飞虎. 620例结肠黑变病临床资料分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2019, 06(02): 66-69.
[14] 谢娇, 王雯, 李达周, 叶舟, 许斌斌, 徐桂林, 洪东贵, 曾茹娇. 冷圈套联合黏膜下注射对结直肠(微)小息肉的完整切除率的研究[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2019, 06(01): 1-6.
[15] 张学云, 季大年, 项平, 郑松柏. 老年患者结直肠息肉临床、内镜及病理特征分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(04): 12-15.
阅读次数
全文


摘要