切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 268 -272. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.05.003

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

机器人保留脾血管胰体尾切除术治疗儿童胰岛素瘤报道
胡明根1, 肖元宏2, 宋栋达1, 赵国栋1, 吴振宇1, 王政2, 李浩宇2, 刘荣1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院肝胆外二科
    2. 100853 北京,解放军总医院小儿外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-27 出版日期:2016-10-30
  • 通信作者: 刘荣

First report of robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for children suffered from insulinoma

Minggen Hu1, Yuanhong Xiao2, Dongda Song1, Guodong Zhao1, Zhenyu Wu1, Zheng Wang2, Haoyu Li2, Rong Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of 2nd Hepatobiliary Department; Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2016-09-27 Published:2016-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Rong Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Rong, Email:
引用本文:

胡明根, 肖元宏, 宋栋达, 赵国栋, 吴振宇, 王政, 李浩宇, 刘荣. 机器人保留脾血管胰体尾切除术治疗儿童胰岛素瘤报道[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(05): 268-272.

Minggen Hu, Yuanhong Xiao, Dongda Song, Guodong Zhao, Zhenyu Wu, Zheng Wang, Haoyu Li, Rong Liu. First report of robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for children suffered from insulinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(05): 268-272.

目的

报道国内外首例儿童机器人保留脾血管胰体尾切除术,探讨该方法治疗儿童胰腺良性疾病的可行性和安全性。

方法

2016年7月收治1例儿童胰体尾胰岛素瘤病例,患儿女性,9岁,体质量24 kg,身高1.20 m。行机器人保留脾血管的胰体尾切除术。机器人操作时采用4孔法:自脐下缘微小切口置入气腹针建立气腹后缝合该切口,观察孔位于下腹正中脐下5 cm(10 mm),1臂位于左侧平脐水平与腋前线的交点(8 mm),2臂位于右侧脐水平下2 cm与腋前线交点(8 mm),辅助孔位于左侧锁骨中线脐水平下3 cm(12 mm)。用超声刀切开胃结肠韧带,显露胰腺,腹腔镜超声探查证实病灶位于胰尾,直径约2 cm;切断脾结肠韧带,结肠脾曲向下游离;用电凝沿胰腺下缘分离胰后间隙,向脾门进行,将胰尾与脾脏之间的粘连分开,于胰腺后方分离出脾静脉,胰腺上缘分离出脾动脉,逐一分离夹闭或缝合动静脉与胰腺之间的分支,使胰尾完全游离,距离肿瘤右侧约1 cm以直线切割闭合器蓝色钉仓切断胰体尾,胰腺断端以4-0 Prolene线连续缝合。标本装入一次性标本袋自辅助孔取出,胰腺断端放置乳胶引流管1根自腹壁右侧孔引出。

结果

手术时间155 min,气腹时间120 min,术中出血量约10 ml,围手术期恢复顺利,无胰瘘、出血及腹腔感染等并发症。术后血糖恢复正常,空腹胰岛素及血糖比值小于0.4,胰腺MRI平扫及增强扫描显示胰腺无肿瘤残留。

结论

机器人与传统腹腔镜相比,具有三维视野、操作灵活等优点,该病例的成功经验初步显示机器人保留脾血管的胰体尾切除术治疗儿童胰岛素瘤是安全、可行的。

Objective

To report the first case of robotic-assisted splenic vascular preserving distal pancreatectomy for child patient in China, and to investigate the feasibility and safety of this surgical method in the treatment of children's benign pancreatic diseases.

Methods

A 9-year-old female patient (24 kg in weight and 1.20 m in height) diagnosed with insulinoma in the tail of pancreas was hospitalized in Jul. 2016 and was treated with robotic-assisted splenic vascular preserving distal pancreatectomy. The pneumoperitoneum was established with Veress needle through a minor incision in the inferior edge of umbilicus and the incision was closed whereafter. The robotic-assisted procedure was performed with four ports: a 10 mm optical port in the ventral midline 5 cm blow the umbilicus, an 8 mm port for the first robotic arm in the left anterior axillary line at the level of umbilicus, an 8 mm port for the second robotic arm in the right anterior axillary line 2 cm below the level of umbilicus, a 12 mm assistant port in the left midclavicular line 3 cm below the level of umbilicus. The gastrocolic ligament was divided by ultrasonic scalpel to expose the pancreas. The tumor was identified in the tail of pancreas using laparoscopic ultrasound, with a diameter of 2 cm. Then the splenocolic ligament was divided and splenic flexure was dissected downwards. The pancreas was separated from the retroperitoneal tissues with robotic hook cautery along the inferior border of pancreas towards the splenic hilum.After division of adhesion between the tail of pancreas and spleen, the splenic vein and artery were dissected off the posterior of pancreas and superior edge of pancreas, respectively. The branches of splenic vessels into the pancreas were progressively ligated or sutured to free the tail of pancreas completely. Subsequently, the distal pancreas was transected using laparoscopic linear stapler (Echelon 60, blue cartridge, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, United States) 1 cm from the right side of the tumor. The cut edge was continuously sutured using 4-0 Prolene. The resected specimen was transferred into the endo-bag and removed through the assistant port. A rubber drainage tube along the cut edge of pancreas was brought out through a stab incision on the right side of abdominal wall.

Results

The operative time was 155 minutes and the pneumoperitoneum time was 120 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 10 ml. The postoperative recovery was smoothly, without complications like pancreatic fistula, bleeding and infection, etc. The blood glucose was restored normal with a fasting insulin to glucose ratio less than 0.4. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI showed no sign of tumor residue.

Conclusions

Compared with traditional laparoscopic procedure, robotic-assisted surgery has advantages including three-dimensional vision and flexible manipulation, etc. The successful operation of this case initially ascertained the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in the treatment of insulinomas in children.

图1 CT增强扫描
图2 MRI动态增强扫描
图3 Trocar的分布
图4 4孔法Trocar切口愈合情况
图5 EC60蓝色钉仓直线切割闭合器行胰体尾的切除
1
James A, O′Neill, Arnold G, et al. Pediatric Surgery [M].5版,纽约:莫斯比,1998: 1539.
2
刘荣,赵之明. 正确认识"达芬奇"手术机器人在肝胆胰外科中的作用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2012, 5 (2): 1-3.
3
黄格元,蓝传亮,刘雪来,等. 达芬奇机器人在小儿外科手术中的应用(附20例报告)[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2013, 13 (1): 4-8.
4
Stauffer JA, Asbun HJ. Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery [J]. Seminars in Oncology, 2015, 42 (1): 123-133.
5
Chen Y, Yan J, Yuan Z, et al. A meta-analysis of robotic-assisted pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open pancreatectomy [J]. Saudi Medical Journal, 2013, 34 (12): 1229-1236.
6
Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, et al. Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? a comparative study from a single medical center [J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics & Computer Assisted Surgery, 2014, 10 (3): 280-285.
7
Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, et al. Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (> median 3 years) oncologic outcomes [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 (10): 2848-2855.
8
Parisi A, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, et al. Road accident due to a pancreatic insulinoma: a case report [J]. Medicine, 2015, 94 (12): 537.
9
施昱晟,彭承宏,詹茜,等.机器人手术系统行胰腺钩突肿瘤切除术疗效评价(附6例报告) [J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2015 (3): 308-312.
10
秦凯,金佳斌,施源,等. 胰头部实性假乳头肿瘤的机器人微创治疗(附12例报告) [J]. 外科理论与实,2015, 20 (6): 479-484.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 刘琴, 刘瀚旻, 谢亮. 基质金属蛋白酶在儿童哮喘发生机制中作用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 564-568.
[3] 向韵, 卢游, 杨凡. 全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露与儿童肥胖症相关性研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 569-574.
[4] 郑宝英, 黄小兰, 贾楠, 朱春梅. 儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎早期预警指标[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 215-221.
[5] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[6] 刘冉佳, 崔向丽, 周效竹, 曲伟, 朱志军. 儿童肝移植受者健康相关生存质量评价的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 302-309.
[7] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[8] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
[9] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[10] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[11] 李澄清, 郭文毅, 王磊. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术:微创胰腺外科的合理决策[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 620-624.
[12] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[13] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[14] 陈晓胜, 何佳, 刘方, 吴蕊, 杨海涛, 樊晓寒. 直立倾斜试验诱发31 秒心脏停搏的植入心脏起搏器儿童一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 488-494.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?