切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 132 -135. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.03.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

单中心23年胆道外科腹腔镜手术的围手术期安全性分析
吕少诚1, 李先亮1, 史宪杰2,(), 顾万清2, 陈永亮2, 夏红天2, 刘博2, 黄晓强2   
  1. 1. 100020 北京,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院肝胆外科
    2. 100853 北京,解放军总医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-01 出版日期:2016-06-30
  • 通信作者: 史宪杰

Safety analysis of perioperative period of biliary laparoscopic surgery among 23 years in a single center

Shaocheng Lyu1, Xianliang Li1, Xianjie Shi2,(), Wanqing Gu2, Yongliang Chen2, Hongtian Xia2, Bo Liu2, Xiaoqiang Huang2   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2015-12-01 Published:2016-06-30
  • Corresponding author: Xianjie Shi
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shi Xianjie, Email:
引用本文:

吕少诚, 李先亮, 史宪杰, 顾万清, 陈永亮, 夏红天, 刘博, 黄晓强. 单中心23年胆道外科腹腔镜手术的围手术期安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(03): 132-135.

Shaocheng Lyu, Xianliang Li, Xianjie Shi, Wanqing Gu, Yongliang Chen, Hongtian Xia, Bo Liu, Xiaoqiang Huang. Safety analysis of perioperative period of biliary laparoscopic surgery among 23 years in a single center[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(03): 132-135.

目的

分析解放军总医院23年间收治胆道外科行腹腔镜手术患者的围手术期情况,探讨腹腔镜手术在胆道外科应用中的安全性。

方法

根据相关纳入标准回顾性分析解放军总医院胆道外科1992年4月至2014年12月期间收治的连续11 419例腹腔镜手术患者的临床资料,进而分析其围手术期并发症发生和严重程度情况。选取同期行开腹手术的患者资料作为对照进行对比分析,比较两组患者之间围手术期和术后并发症情况。

结果

(1)解放军总医院胆道外科1992年4月至2014年12月23年间收治的行腹腔镜手术患者共11 419例,占同期胆道外科手术患者的56.33%。(2)在所有患者中,围手术期死亡患者2例,病死率为0.02%;发生并发症患者43例,并发症发生率为0.38%。在所有并发症中,最常见的依次为胆瘘、切口感染和腹腔感染,发生率分别为0.18%、0.05%和0.05%,其中60.42%的并发症为Ⅱ级并发症,V级致死性并发症占4.17%。(3)腹腔镜手术并发症患者中构成比最高的疾病是胆囊良性疾病和肝外胆管结石,分别占58.14%和25.58%。(4) 对于胆囊良性疾病而言,腹腔镜手术的术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间、并发症发生率、病死率均优于开腹手术[(15.6±26.1)ml、(1.1±0.5)h、(2.1±1.8)d、25例(0.22%)、1例(0.01%)] vs [(136.1±168.2)ml、(1.7±0.8)h、(9.8±5.4)d、25例(0.22%)、80例(4.42%)](P<0.01)。对于肝外胆管结石患者而言,腹腔镜手术的术中出血量、术后住院时间和并发症发生率方面优于开腹手术[(44.4±46.1)ml、(5.4±5.7)h、11例(3.24%)] vs [(142.5±125.0)ml、(13.0±9.1)h、(9.8±5.4)d、84例(13.29%)](P<0.01)。

结论

随着腹腔镜技术在胆道外科的推广和发展,其在胆囊良性疾病和肝外胆管结石中的应用最为广泛,围手术期效果明显优于开腹手术。

Objective

To analyze the data of perioperative period of patients with biliary laparoscopic surgery during the 23 years of the PLA General Hospital, and to explore the safety of laparoscopic surgery in biliary surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 11 419 consecutive patients underwent biliary laparoscopic surgery in PLA General Hospital between Apr. 1992 and Dec. 2014 according to the inclusion criteria. The data of biliary open surgery patients in the same period were selected as the control group to compare, and the postoperative complications of the two groups were analyzed.

Results

(1) From Apr. 1992 to Dec. 2014, 11 419 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery in the General Hospital of PLA among 23 years, and accounted for 56.33% of patients with biliary surgery. (2) In all patients, 2 patients died in the perioperative period, the mortality rate was 0.02%, 43 cases occurred complications, and the complication rate was 0.38%. The most common complications were biliary fistula, wound infection and abdominal infection. The incidence rate were 0.18%, 0.05% and 0.05%. Among the complications, 60.42% were Grade II compications and 4.17% were Grade V. (3)The most common diseases with complication after laparoscopic surgery were gallbladder benign disease and extrahepatic bile duct stones, accounted for 58.14% and 25.58%. (4) For gallbladder benign disease patients, the intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, hospitalization days, complication rate, mortality rate of laparoscopic surgery were superior to open surgery[(15.6±26.1)ml、(1.1±0.5)h、(2.1±1.8)d、25 patients (0.22%)、1 patient (0.01%)] vs [(136.1±168.2)ml、(1.7±0.8)h、(9.8±5.4)d、25 patients (0.22%)、80 patients (4.42%)](P<0.01). For extrahepatic bile duct stones patients, the intraoperative bleeding volume, hospitalization days and complication rate of laparoscopic surgery were superior to open surgery [(44.4±46.1)ml、(5.4±5.7)h、11 patients (3.24%)] vs [(142.5±125.0)ml、(13.0±9.1)h、(9.8±5.4)d、84 patients (13.29%)] (P<0.01).

Conclusions

With the development of laparoscopic technology in biliary surgery, it is the most widely used in the gallbladder benign disease and extrahepatic bile duct stones, and the perioperative effect is better than that of the open surgery.

表1 腹腔镜手术治疗胆道外科疾病43例发生并发症患者的48例次并发症比较
表2 腹腔镜手术治疗胆道外科疾病43例发生并发症患者的48例次严重程度Clavien分级比较
表3 腹腔镜手术治疗胆道外科疾病发生并发症患者43例的原发病情况比较
表4 腹腔镜手术与胆囊良性疾病开腹手术治疗胆道外科疾病患者的围手术期资料比较
表5 腹腔镜手术与肝外胆管结石开腹手术治疗胆道外科疾病患者的围手术期资料比较
1
黄志强. 胆道外科的百年沧桑——从Langenbuch到Mouret[J]. 中华外科杂志,2013,51(3): 193-197.
2
Fang CH, Xie AW, Chen ML, et a1. Application of a visible simulation surgery technique in preoperation planning for intrahepatic calculi[J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(2): 327-335.
3
吕少诚,黄志强. 浅谈我国胆道外科的发展现状与展望[J]. 国际外科学杂志,2014,41(5): 289-292.
4
高蔚,金昌国,魏小军,等. 腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术的临床应用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2014,7(3): 240-242.
5
Hair CD, Sejpal DV. Future developments in biliary stenting[J]. Clin Exp Gastroenterol, 2013, 24(6): 91-99.
6
Saluja SS, Nayeem M, Sharma BC, et al. Management of choledochal cysts and their complications[J]. Am Surg, 2012, 78(3): 284-290.
7
陈晓鹏,张卫东,王东. 微创时代肝胆外科的现状与思考[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2011,23(4): 269-271.
8
王晔飞,沈艾,刘波,等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全性Meta分析[J]. 中国实用外科,2012,32(12): 1031-1036.
9
Tang ST, Yang Y, Wang Y, et al. Laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision, hepaticojejunnostomy, and extracorporeal Roux-en-Y anastomosis: a technical skill and intermediate-term report in 62 cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(2): 416-422.
10
孙强,常晓健,胡泽民,等. 倒刺缝线在腹腔镜胆总管囊肿切除术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2014,7(6): 462-465.
11
黄志强. 今日胆道外科[J]. 中华实验外科杂志,2011,28(11): 1827-1828.
12
余少鸿,赵嵘,温小明. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆道损伤的原因及处理[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2013,6(6): 447-449.
13
李建军,卢榜裕,蔡小勇,等. 腹腔镜胆道修复重建术治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的胆管损伤[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2013,6(2): 91-98.
14
Keeling NJ, Menzies D, Motson RW, et al. Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: beyond the learning curve[J]. Surg Endosc, 1999, 13(2): 109-112.
15
吕少诚,史宪杰,王宏光,等. 腹腔镜胆总管探查取石一期缝合术的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2010,4(2): 95-98.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[9] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[10] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[11] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[12] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[13] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[14] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[15] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?