Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01): 27-30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.01.007

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A comparative study of two different types of robotic surgery for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the head of pancreas

Zhiming Zhao 1, Nan Jiang 1, Zhuzeng Yin 1, Yong Xu 1, Guodong Zhao 1, Yuanxing Gao 1, Rong Liu 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. The Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2020-01-02 Online:2020-02-28 Published:2020-02-28
  • Contact: Rong Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Rong, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the feasibility of robotic enucleation (REN) and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in the treatment of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPT) in the head of the pancreas and the short-term and long-term results.

Methods

From Jan. 2016 to Apr. 2019, 28 patients with SPT at the head of pancreas, 10 patients resected REN and 18 patients resected RPD were selected. Retrospectively analysis of the two groups of patients with general information, surgery, postoperative follow-up and other data, the two groups were compared and evaluated.

Results

The median age was 29 years old, and the ratio of male to female was 1∶8.33. The BMI of REN group was less (P=0.046). There was no perioperative death or secondary operation in both groups. Compared with RPD group, REN group had shorter operation time (P<0.001) and less bleeding (P=0.009). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative complication rate, pancreatic fistula rate and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, there was no recurrence in both groups, and the incidence of postoperative exocrine dysfunction was lower in REN group (P=0.039).

Conclusions

Robotic enucleation of tumor is safe and feasible, with obvious advantages of organ and function preservation, and will not increase postoperative pancreatic fistula and other serious complications. It is suggested that robotic enucleation should be the first choice for patients with SPT in the head of pancreas.

Key words: Pancreas, Solid pseudopapillary tumor, Robotic

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd