To compare the clinical data of Da Vinci robotic and laparoscpic surgical treatment of cervical stump cancer, discuss the Da Vinci robotic safety and advantage.

A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 9 cases of cervical stump cancer patients in hospital(clinical stage for Ⅰb1-Ⅱa2) who undergoing radical hysterectomy in Jilin Province Tumor Hospital from Oct. 2014 to Oct. 2016, 4 cases of cervical stump cancer undergoing robot radical hysterectomy(robot group)and 5 cases of cervical stump cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy(traditional laparoscopic group).

The operation time were(151.3 ± 10.4)min and(150.3 ± 13.2)min, the operation blood loss were(108.5 ± 26.5)ml and(232.5 ± 18.5)ml, the activity time after surgery were(1.5 ± 0.8)d and (2.3 ± 0.5)d, postoperative urinary tube pull out time were(8.5 ± 0.5)d and(14.6 ± 1.3)d, postoperative pain VAS score were(4.8 ± 0.9)and (6.4 ± 1.4), the exhaust time after surgery were(1.4 ± 0.6)d and(2.6 ± 0.7)d, the the length of time after the surgery(10.4 ± 1.7)d and(15.2 ± 2.1)d in robot group and traditional laparoscopic. The operation time there was no statistically significant (P> 0.05). All the rest of the project the differenct was statistically significant (P< 0.05).

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for cervical stump cancer is safe and feasible.