Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03): 156-162. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2022.03.008

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

The comparison of the short-term outcomes between open gastrectomy and robotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients in China

Fei Peng1, Jun Huang2, Hao Cui2, Bo Cao3, Huan Deng3, Guibin Liu2, Liqiang Song2, Ruiyang Zhao3, Hanghang Li3, Lin Chen3, Bo Wei3, Ning Wang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Zhongxian People’s Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 404399, China.
    2. Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing 100853, China.; School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
    3. Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing 100853, China.
  • Received:2022-01-21 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-19
  • Contact: Ning Wang

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the short-term outcomes between open and robotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients and explore the independent factors which influenced postoperative complications after gastrectomy.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted. We collected clinical data of 161 elder patients (Age over 70 years) undergoing open or robotic gastrectomy in the department of general surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center between May 2017 and May 2021 were collected. The characteristics of clinicopathological datas between two groups were not significantly different(P>0.05).

Results

The operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group compared to the open group [(242.92±55.12) min vs. (170.37±43.15)min, P<0.001]. Although intraoperative bleeding was comparable between the robotic and open groups [100 ml (100-200) ml vs. 100 ml (10-200) ml, P=0.102], the proportion of bleeding ≥400 ml was significantly lower in the robotic group compared with the open group(4.8% vs. 15.4%), with a statistically significant difference (P=0.025). The difference between the robotic and open groups were not statistically significant in the aspect of the number of retrieved lymph nodes [(24.51±9.51) vs. (24.28±9.36), P=0.881], postoperative hospital stay [10.0 d (9.0-12.0) d vs. 9.1 d (8.6-11.0) d, P=0.094], 30 days postoperative complication rate (25.3% vs. 26.9%, P=0.815), severe complication rate (8.4% vs. 3.8%, P=0.228), anastomotic leakage rate (2.4% vs. 5.1%, P=0.363), and 30 days postoperative mortality (2.4% vs. 1.3%, P=0.597). Univariate and multifactorial analyses showed that age ≥80 years was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Conclusions

Elderly patients who accepted robotic gastrectomy are safe and feasible. Over 80 years old is the independent risk factor of the postoperative complications after gastrectomy which needs to evaluate the surgical risk sufficiently.

Key words: Gastric cancer, Elder age, Robotic gastrectomy, Open gastrectomy, Complications

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd