Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06): 376-380. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.06.014

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in single port thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer

Zhanliang Ren 1 , ( ), Yong Zhang 1, Xiaopeng Ren 1, Weifeng Zhang 1, Yingjie Han 1   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712000, China
  • Received:2017-10-19 Online:2017-12-30 Published:2017-12-30
  • Contact: Zhanliang Ren
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ren Zhanliang, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in single hole assisted thoracoscopic lung cancer radical surgery clinical perioperative period.

Methods

From Feb. 2015 to May 2017 the Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine department of thoracic surgery treated 48 cases of patients with lung cancer, surgery for hole thoracoscopic lung resection on the basis of perioperative treatment, were divided into control group of 27 cases and 21 cases in ERAS group. The two groups were analyzed and compared the postoperative pain score, operative time, intraoperative fluid volume, chest tube removal time, hospitalization time, inflammation index, D-two poly detection, postoperative complications.

Results

After the operation of group ERAS 24 h, 36 h , 72 h, VAS pain score (3.22 ±0.97), (3.08 ±0.71), (3.93±0.67) was significantly lower than the control group (4.96±0.75), (5.15±0.46), (5.41±0.25), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01) ERAS; group limited fluid resuscitation during operation, the liquid input is significantly less than the control group, postoperative extubation time, hospitalization time is shorter than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); there is no difference between the two groups in operation time. Day 1, 4 ERAS group of white blood cell count and CRP levels after operation were lower than the control group, ERAS group after two D- dimer was lower than that of control group (P<0.05) in.ERAS group. The total incidence rate was 14.29%, significantly lower than the control group the overall complication rate of 48.15%, there are differences (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The perioperative application the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery as a guide hole thoracoscopic lung cancer radical change, and optimize the processing mode, reduce the complications and accelerate the rehabilitation after operation.

Key words: Enhanced recovery after surgery, Single hole thoracoscopy, Radical resection of lung cancer

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd