Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06): 361-365. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.06.011

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of modified Blumgart anastomosis in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy

Xiaoqing Wang 1, Feng Fang 1, Guangtao Li 1, Hongying He 1, Tianqiang Song 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Tianjin Medical University Center Institude and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin′s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Received:2017-10-19 Online:2017-12-30 Published:2017-12-30
  • Contact: Tianqiang Song
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Song Tianqiang, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the security, clinical outcomes and short-term effects of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy ( RPD ).

Methods

Perioperative clinical data of 23 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)procedures performed from Jan. to Dec.2016 by the single operator in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital were retrospective analyzed, among which 10 patients underwent RPD ( RPD group) while 13 patients received open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD group). Perioperative outcomes were compared within these two groups.

Results

All of the patients have been through the surgery and then recovered successfully without dead. No significant difference had been found between the two groups in age, sex, BMI, ASA score .The RPD group had significantly longer operative time [ (429 ± 77.5) min vs (288.5 ± 35.8) min, P< 0.001) ], higher hospitalization expense[(16.2 ± 2.6) ten thousand yuan vs (12.7 ± 2.8) ten thousand yuan, P= 0.006) ], reduced estimated blood loss [( 105.0 ± 72.5) ml vs ( 276.9 ± 136.3) ml, P= 0.002) ], earlier ambulation [( 1.8 ± 0.7)d vs ( 2.9 ± 1.0) d, P= 0.010)], shorter postoperative hospital stay[(16.0 ± 6.0)d vs (25.7 ± 14.5)d, P=0.043)]. Moreover, 1 case (10%)in RPD group and 2 cases(15.4%) in OPD group experienced pancreatic fistular , there is no significant difference in pancreatic fistular rate(P=0.710).

Conclusions

Modified Blumgart anastomosis in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy serves as a safe and feasible operation resulting in less trauma and quicker recovery.It is worth promoting and perfecting in future.

Key words: Robotic, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pancreaticojejunostomy

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01066937562 E-mail: zhonghuaqiangjing@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd