切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 100 -105. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2024.02.007

论著

基于HVPG分层的门脉高压内镜治疗中远期疗效研究
吴俊嶺1, 孟科1, 刘江涛2, 孙刚1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科医学部
    2. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-13 出版日期:2024-04-30
  • 通信作者: 孙刚
  • 基金资助:
    海南省科技厅重点研发计划(ZDYF2017105); 海南省自然科学基金面上项目(822MS195)

A study on the mid- to long-term efficacy of endoscopic therapy for portal hypertension based on HVPG stratification

Junling Wu1, Ke Meng1, Jiangtao Liu2, Gang Sun1,()   

  1. 1. The First Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology Medicine, Chinese People′s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    2. The First Medical Center, Interventional Radiology Department, Chinese People′s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2024-02-13 Published:2024-04-30
  • Corresponding author: Gang Sun
引用本文:

吴俊嶺, 孟科, 刘江涛, 孙刚. 基于HVPG分层的门脉高压内镜治疗中远期疗效研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 100-105.

Junling Wu, Ke Meng, Jiangtao Liu, Gang Sun. A study on the mid- to long-term efficacy of endoscopic therapy for portal hypertension based on HVPG stratification[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 17(02): 100-105.

目的

探讨基于HVPG分层,采取内镜下治疗预防肝硬化静脉曲张患者再出血的中远期疗效。

方法

收集符合入组条件的静脉曲张出血患者,记录经急诊止血治疗后早期再出血的情况,按照HVPG水平将患者分为三组,分别给予不同的二级预防治疗:(1)低HVPG组:HVPG≤16 mmHg,给予内镜下套扎治疗(endoscopic variceal ligation,EVL);(2)中HVPG组:16 mmHg<HVPG≤20 mmHg,给予部分脾动脉栓塞术(partial splenic embolization,PSE)联合EVL治疗;(3)高HVPG组:HVPG>20 mmHg,行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt,TIPS)治疗联合EVL治疗。随访期间所有患者均口服非选择性β受体阻滞剂治疗,随访记录各组患者远期再出血和死亡情况。

结果

共入组67例患者(低HVPG组22例,中HVPG组27例,高HVPG组18例)。7例出现早期再出血,其中3例患者HVPG测压值大于12 mmHg,小于等于16 mmHg,4例患者HVPG测压值大于20 mmHg,多因素回归分析显示HVPG值和总胆红素水平是早期再出血的独立危险因素。平均随访时间20.94个月,随访期间共有12例出现远期再出血,低HVPG组,中HVPG组以及高HVPG组2年维持无再出血率分别为86.4% vs.77.4% vs. 83.3%,高、中HVPG组分别与低HVPG组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对肝硬化静脉曲张出血的患者,通过基于HVPG压力梯度进行危险分层,采用不同二级预防策略,可以使高HVPG和中HVPG组获得与低HVPG组类似的长期再出血预防效果,即在此治疗模式的指导下,选择EVL联合PSE、TIPS等治疗方式可有效预防静脉曲张再出血。

Objective

To investigate the mid- to long-term efficacy of endoscopic treatment based on Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) stratification in preventing rebleeding in patients with cirrhotic varices.

Methods

Patients with variceal bleeding who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and their early rebleeding status after emergency hemostasis treatment was recorded. Based on HVPG levels, patients were stratified into three groups and received different secondary prevention treatments: (1) Low HVPG group (HVPG ≤ 16 mmHg): endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL); (2) Moderate HVPG group (16 mmHg < HVPG ≤ 20 mmHg): partial splenic embolization (PSE) combined with EVL; (3) High HVPG group (HVPG > 20 mmHg): transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with EVL. All patients received oral non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) during follow-up, and the occurrence of long-term rebleeding and death was recorded for each group.

Results

A total of 67 patients were enrolled (22 in the low HVPG group, 27 in the moderate HVPG group, and 18 in the high HVPG group). Seven patients experienced early rebleeding, among whom three had HVPG values greater than 12 mmHg but less than or equal to 16 mmHg, and four had HVPG values greater than 20 mmHg. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that HVPG value and total bilirubin level were independent risk factors for early rebleeding. With an average follow-up time of 20.94 months, 12 patients experienced long-term rebleeding. The 2-year probability of maintaining no rebleeding in the low HVPG group, moderate HVPG group, and high HVPG group were 86.4% vs. 77.4% vs. 83.3% respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the high and moderate HVPG groups compared to the low HVPG group (P>0.05), respectively.

Conclusion

For patients with variceal bleeding due to cirrhosis, risk stratification based on HVPG and different secondary prevention strategies can achieve similar long-term rebleeding prevention effects in high and moderate HVPG groups as in low HVPG group. That is, under the guidance of this treatment model, the combination of EVL with PSE, TIPS, and other treatment methods can effectively prevent variceal rebleeding.

图1 病例纳入排除流程图
表1 纳入患者的临床和实验室特征
图2 急性食管胃底静脉曲张再出血风险因素分析
图3 三组患者累积再出血风险生存分析
20
Abraldes JG, Villanueva C, Bañares R, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient and prognosis in patients with acute variceal bleeding treated with pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy[J]. J Hepatol, 2008, 48(2):229-236.
21
Zhang M, Wang G, Zhao L, et al. Second prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with a high HVPG[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2016, 51(12):1502-1506.
22
Monescillo A, Martínez-Lagares F, Ruiz-del-Arbol L, et al. Influence of portal hypertension and its early decompression by TIPS placement on the outcome of variceal bleeding[J]. Hepatology, 2004, 40(4):793-801.
1
Seo YS. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices[J]. Clin Mol Hepatol, 2018, 24(1):20-42.
2
Jakab SS, Garcia-Tsao G. Evaluation and management of esophageal and gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Clin Liver Dis, 2020, 24(3):335-350.
3
de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension[J]. J Hepatol, 2022, 76(4):959-974.
4
González A, Augustin S, Pérez M, et al. Hemodynamic response-guided therapy for prevention of variceal rebleeding: an uncontrolled pilot study[J]. Hepatology, 2006, 44(4):806-812.
5
Li GQ, Yang B, Liu J, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient is a useful predictor in guiding treatment on prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhosis[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(10):19709-19716.
6
Pavel V, Scharf G, Mester P, et al. Partial splenic embolization as a rescue and emergency treatment for portal hypertension and gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2023, 23(1):180.
7
Suk KT. Hepatic venous pressure gradient: clinical use in chronic liver disease[J]. Clin Mol Hepatol, 2014, 20(1):6-14.
8
刘江涛,王淑芳,赵义名,等. 微创时代肝硬化门静脉高压精准治疗概念探讨[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 337-341.
9
Suk KT, Kim CH, Park SH, et al. Comparison of hepatic venous pressure gradient and two models of end-stage liver disease for predicting the survival in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2012, 46(10):880-886.
10
Xu X, Tang C, Linghu E, et al. Guidelines for the management of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhotic portal hypertension[J]. J Clin Transl Hepatol, 2023, 11(7):1565-1579.
11
Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, et al. The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009, 6(10):573-582.
12
Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, et al. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis[J]. Hepatology, 2007, 46(3):922-938.
13
Groszmann RJ, Bosch J, Grace ND, et al. Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage[J]. Gastroenterology, 1990, 99(5):1401-1407.
14
Koconis KG, Singh H, Soares G. Partial splenic embolization in the treatment of patients with portal hypertension: a review of the english language literature[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2007, 18(4):463-481.
15
Wang P, Liu R, Tong L, et al. Partial splenic embolization has beneficial effects for the management of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage[J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2016, 22(6):399-406.
16
Zhao Y, Guo L, Huang Q, et al. Observation of immediate and mid-term effects of partial spleen embolization in reducing hepatic venous pressure gradient[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(47):e17900.
17
de Franchis R, Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension[J]. J Hepatol, 2015, 63(3):743-752.
18
Larrue H, D′Amico G, Olivas P, et al. TIPS prevents further decompensation and improves survival in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension in an individual patient data meta-analysis[J]. J Hepatol, 2023, 79(3):692-703.
19
Lv Y, Yang Z, Liu L, et al. Early TIPS with covered stents versus standard treatment for acute variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 4(8):587-598.
[1] 古丽米拉·亚森江, 阿依努尔·艾尔肯, 李佳隆, 郭强, 蒋铁民, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉. 胆囊切除术后胆管损伤不同治疗方式的疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 262-266.
[2] 熊震, 阳光辉, 郑小春, 王娜. 支气管镜下联合介入治疗75例良性中央气道狭窄效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 645-649.
[3] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[4] 刘宝帅, 高显华, 潘受禹, 曹强坚, 刘连杰, 张卫. 家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者结直肠息肉的内镜下诊断治疗进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 26-31.
[5] 高振轩, 谢晨, 曹绍东, 甘中伟, 周倍, 罗朝川, 王子齐, 葛煜彤, 张伟光. 高分辨率核磁共振在颅颈大动脉狭窄介入治疗中的临床应用进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 112-119.
[6] 潘晓帆, 徐勤义, 陆瑨, 王丹, 刘路路, 董万利. 颅内动脉瘤破裂介入术后并发脑疝的风险因素分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 37-44.
[7] 陈涛, 石红建, 周良, 甘振. 介入治疗胃胆胰术后迟发性出血的临床疗效与安全性[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 39-44.
[8] 崔皓然, 顾俊鹏, 任伟新. 基于经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合治疗肝癌伴门静脉癌栓的进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 64-69.
[9] 李世凯, 梁佳, 何艳艳, 于毅, 李天晓, 常金龙, 贺迎坤. 兔颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄模型在介入治疗的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 357-362.
[10] 张德伟, 雷毅, 江哲宇, 王黎洲, 许国辉, 周石. 杂交手术治疗下肢深静脉血栓合并下肢急性动脉血栓一例[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 380-384.
[11] 钟冬祥, 杨兵. 结构性心脏病介入治疗进展[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 247-256.
[12] 陈丹丹, 潘文志, 陈莎莎, 张源, 张晓春, 李明飞, 周达新, 葛均波. 结构性心脏病年度报告2022[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 129-140.
[13] 段丽娟, 蒋艳, 樊朝凤, 曹华. 颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后不留置导尿管的效果及安全性[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 104-109.
[14] 辛伽伦, 袁兴运, 刘志勤, 师瑞, 蒋锋, 刘锋昌, 李伟旺, 张恒, 郭强, 何剑波, 姚力. 药物洗脱支架在急性大脑中动脉粥样硬化闭塞性卒中患者急诊血管成形术中的临床疗效[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 539-544.
[15] 姜新鹏, 李晓明, 杨航, 宫一宸, 傅元豪, 傅瑜, 张喆. 单纯经胸超声心动图引导卵圆孔未闭封堵术早期安全性及有效性分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 320-324.
阅读次数
全文


摘要