切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05): 265 -270. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.05.003

论著 上一篇    下一篇

老年胃癌患者行机器人胃癌根治术后近期并发症的影响因素分析
王宁 1, 崔昊 2, 刘贵宾 2, 曹博 1, 邓欢 1, 谢天宇 2, 陈润开 1, 宋立强 2, 赵瑞阳 1, 李航航 1, 张庆鹏 1, 卫勃 3 , ( )   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科医学部,全军普通外科研究所
    2. 300071 天津,南开大学医学院
    3. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科医学部,全军普通外科研究所;300071 天津,南开大学医学院
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-02 出版日期:2021-10-30
  • 通信作者: 卫勃
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划课题(2019YFB1311505); 国家自然科学基金(81773135,82073192)

Risk factors of postoperative complication after robotic gastrectomy for elder gastric cancer patients

Ning Wang 1, Hao Cui 2, Guibin Liu 2, Bo Cao 1, Huan Deng 1, Tianyu Xie 2, Runkai Chen 1, Liqiang Song 2, Ruiyang Zhao 1, Hanghang Li 1, Qingpeng Zhang 1, Bo Wei 3 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing 100853, China
    2. School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
    3. Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing 100853, China; School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • Received:2021-08-02 Published:2021-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Bo Wei
目的

分析行机器人胃癌根治术老年胃癌患者术后近期疗效及影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2016年4月至2021年4月167例于解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科医学部行机器人胃癌根治术的老年患者临床病历资料,运用单因素及多因素分析术后30 d并发症的影响因素。

结果

167例患者中,49例(29.3%)出现Clavien-Dindo分级≥Ⅱ级术后并发症、14例(8.4%)出现Clavien-Dindo分级≥Ⅲa级并发症。单因素分析提示:营养风险筛查2002评分≥3分、脉管侵犯、术中出血量≥400 ml、体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)≥25 kg/m2、aCCI(age-adjusted charlson comorbidity index)评分≥4分与老年胃癌患者行机器人胃癌根治术后30 d内并发症相关,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示脉管侵犯、术中出血量≥400 ml、BMI≥25 kg/m2、aCCI评分≥4分是老年胃癌患者机器人胃癌根治术后发生术后30 d内并发症的独立危险因素(P<0.05),营养风险筛查2002评分≥3分不是其独立相关因素(P>0.05)。

结论

老年胃癌患者行机器人胃癌根治术安全、可行,近期疗效确切。脉管侵犯、术中出血量≥400 ml、BMI≥25 kg/m2、aCCI评分≥4分是老年胃癌患者机器人胃癌根治术后发生术后30 d内并发症的独立危险因素,应对此类患者加以重视,术前充分评估以降低并发症发生概率。

Objective

To analyze the short-term outcomes and factors influencing the postoperative complications of elder patients with gastric cancer under robotic gastrectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 167 elder patients undergoing robotic gastrectomy in the department of general surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center between Apr. 2016 and Apr. 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to find the factors affecting the 30-days postoperative complications.

Results

49 of 167 patients (29.3%) had Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ grade Ⅱ postoperative complications. 14 patients(8.4%) had Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ grade Ⅲa complications. Univariate analysis showed that vascular invasion, intraoperative blood loss ≥400 ml, NRS2002 score ≥3, BMI(body mass index)≥25 kg/m2 and aCCI(age-adjusted charlson comorbidity index)score≥4 were associated with the 30-day postoperative complications in elderly patients with gastric cancer under robotic gastrectomy (P< 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that vascular invasion, intraoperative blood loss ≥400 ml, BMI≥25 kg/m2 and aCCI score≥4 were independent risk factors for 30-days postoperative complications in elderly patients with significant difference.

Conclusions

Elderly patients who accepted robotic gastrectomy are safe and feasible. The independent risk factors for 30-days postoperative complications are vascular invasion, intraoperative blood loss ≥400 ml, BMI≥25 kg/m2 and aCCI score≥4. For patients with above risk factors, surgeons need to pay more attention to avoid complications by sufficient preoperative evaluation.

表1 167例老年胃癌机器人胃癌根治术患者影响并发症发生的单因素分析
项目 无并发症组(118例) 有并发症组(49例) 统计值 OR(95%CI) P
性别(例)     χ2=1.255   0.264
  85 31   1.000)  
  33 18   1.496(0.738~3.031  
年龄(例)   χ2=0.015   0.901
  <80岁 102 42   1.000  
  ≥80岁 16 7   1.062(0.408~2.770)  
体质量指数(例)     χ2=6.740   0.010
  <25 kg/m2 89 27   1.000  
  ≥25 kg/m2 29 22   2.501(1.240~5.045)  
ASA分级(例)     χ2=0.008   0.769
  ≤2分 89 38   1.000  
  >2分 29 11   0.888(0.403~1.960)  
aCCI评分(例)     χ2=11.217   0.001
  <4分 81 20   1.000  
  ≥4分 37 29   3.174(1.593~6.327)  
NRS2002评分(例) χ2=5.059 0.026
  <3分 84 26   1.000  
  ≥3分 34 23   2.186(1.098~4.349)  
腹部手术史(例)     χ2=0.119 0.730
  92 37   1.000  
  26 12   1.148(0.524~2.512)  
术中出血量(例)     χ2=7.472 0.010
  <400 ml 112 40   1.000  
  ≥400 ml 6 9   4.200(1.406~12.545)  
手术时间(例) χ2=0.130 0.719
  ≤240 min 59 26   1.000  
  >240 min 59 23   0.885(0.454~1.724)  
新辅助化学药物治疗(例) χ2=1.279 0.258
  108 42   1.000  
  10 7   1.800(0.643~5.040)  
肿瘤切除范围(例)     χ2=0.302   0.860
  近端 35 16   1.000  
  远端 58 22   0.830(0.385~1.789)  
  全胃 25 11   0.963(0.382~2.423)  
病理分期(例) Z=1.797 0.407
  T0N0-Ⅰ期 37 12   1.000  
  T0N0-Ⅱ期 34 12   1.088(0.431~2.747)  
  T0N0-Ⅲ期 47 25   1.640(0.728~3.694)  
病理分型(例)     χ2=1.951 0.164
  高/中 83 29   1.000  
  低/未分化 35 20   1.635(0.818~3.271)  
肿瘤大小(例)     χ2=0.093   0.760
  <3 cm 31 14   1.000  
  ≥3 cm 87 35   0.891(0.424~1.873)  
神经侵犯(例) χ2=2.977   0.087
  88 30   1.000  
  30 19   1.858(0.915~3.773)  
脉管侵犯(例)     χ2=6.862   0.010
  83 24   1.000  
  35 25   2.470(1.245~4.902)  
表2 167例老年胃癌机器人胃切除术患者并发症发生的多因素分析
1
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians202171(3): 209-249.
2
Pilleron S, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Vignat J, et al. Estimated global cancer incidence in the oldest adults in 2018 and projections to 2050[J]. Int J Cancer, 2021, 148(3): 601-608.
3
张鹏,兰天珩,周一鸣,等. 胃癌根治术围手术期并发症危险因素分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2019, 22(8): 736-741.
4
Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, et al. Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system[J]. Surg Endosc200216(8): 1187-1191.
5
刘荣,赵国栋,孙玉宁,等.5G远程机器人手术动物实验研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)201912(1): 45-48.
6
崔昊,刘国晓,邓欢,等. 机器人与3D腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌D2根治术近期疗效比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(4): 350-356.
7
Garbarino GM, Costa G, Frezza B, et al. Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 20201-9.
8
Ceccarelli G, Andolfi E, Biancafarina A,et al. Robot-assisted surgery in elderly and very elderly population: our experience in oncologic and general surgery with literature review[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res201729(1): 55-63.
9
Lin GS, Huang XY, Lu J, et al. A good preoperative immune prognostic index is predictive of better long-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy compared with open gastrectomy for stage Ⅱ gastric cancer in elderly patients[J]. Surg Endosc2021, 1-13.
10
Nashimoto A. Current status of treatment strategy for elderly patients with gastric cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol201318(6): 969-970.
11
余佩武,陈凛,郝迎学,等.机器人胃癌手术专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志201615(1): 7-11.
12
Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, et al. Extended clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: japan clinical oncology group postoperative complications criteria[J]. Surg Today201646(6): 668-685.
13
曹毛毛,李贺,孙殿钦,等. 2000-2019年中国胃癌流行病学趋势分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2021, 20(1): 102-109.
14
Liang YX, Deng JY, Guo HH, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of gastric cancer in patients aged ≥ 70 years[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(39): 6568-6578.
15
Joharatnam-Hogan N, Shiu KK, Khan K. Challenges in the treatment of gastric cancer in the older patient[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2020, 85(3): 101980.
16
Okumura N, Son T, Kim YM, et al. Robotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: comparisons with robotic gastrectomy in younger patients and laparoscopic gastrectomy in the elderly[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2016, 19(4): 1125-1134.
17
Liu M, Xing J, Arslan A, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese patients with gastric cancer[J]. Medicine (Baltimore)201998(47): 17991.
18
Sahakyan MA, Shahbazyan SS, Martirosyan A, et al. Gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2[J]. Am Surg202086(2): 158-163.
19
刘新,李鹏,刘元圣,等.正常与超重患者的机器人和腹腔镜胃癌根治对比[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)201811(1): 43-46.
20
Chen K, Pan Y, Zhai ST, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods[J]. BMC Gastroenterol201717(1): 78.
21
Li ZY, Zhao YL, Qian F, et al. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative complications after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of 817 cases based on 10-year experience in a large-scale center[J]. Surg Endosc2021, 1-8.
22
康文越,马鹤,潘振祥. 腹腔镜二氧化碳气腹对老年人重要器官的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2013, 33(15): 3807-3809.
23
Lin JX, Huang YQ, Xie JW, et al. Age-adjusted charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) is a significant factor for predicting survival after radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer[J]. BMC Surg, 2019, 19(1): 53.
24
Venianaki M, Andreou A, Nikolouzakis TK, et al. Factors associated with malnutrition and its impact on postoperative outcomes in older patients[J]. J Clin Med202110(12): 2550.
25
Gn YM, Abdullah HR, Loke W, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of preoperative malnutrition risk in older patients and its impact on surgical outcomes: a retrospective observational study[J]. Can J Anaesth202168(5): 622-632.
26
Guo W, Ou G, Li X, et al. Screening of the nutritional risk of patients with gastric carcinoma before operation by NRS 2002 and its relationship with postoperative results[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol201025(4): 800-803.
27
Yang JY, Lee HJ, Kim TH, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes after gastrectomy in elderly gastric cancer patients[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(2): 469-477.
28
Sakurai K, Muguruma K, Nagahara H, et al. The outcome of surgical treatment for elderly patients with gastric carcinoma[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2015, 111(7): 848-854.
29
Pędziwiatr M, Mavrikis J, Witowski J,et al. Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery[J]. Med Oncol201835(6): 95.
30
Tian YL, Cao SG, Liu XD, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes associated with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol vs conventional management in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy[J]. World J Gastroenterol202026(37): 5646-5660.
[1] 关赛楠, 周希, 菅翠玲, 陈伟强, 傅绢, 宋长琳, 袁帆, 许尔蛟. 胃壁厚度在超声筛查胃部病变中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(08): 782-787.
[2] 邓玉燕, 庞永慧, 莫钦国, 谭虹虹, 茅传兰, 陈菲菲. 新辅助化疗对乳腺癌改良根治术后并发症及凝血功能的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 283-287.
[3] 王文华, 吴周全, 恽惠方, 王志萍. 经鼻右美托咪定在老年患者无痛肠镜检查中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 344-348.
[4] 翟育豪, 郑智, 邓薇, 白志刚, 尹杰, 张军. 进展期胃癌新辅助化疗争议的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 386-390.
[5] 于洁, 王领, 范德庆, 李德正, 段洪亮, 蔡瑜. 减重代谢手术治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病患者的临床效果及疗效影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 506-509.
[6] 赵月, 张宗明, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 朱明文, 邓海, 万柏江, 谢希源, 张李鹏. 老年急性结石性胆囊炎手术时机危急值评判[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 521-524.
[7] 汪建林, 李琳, 宋文杰, 彭伟, 李敏. 四种手术方式治疗结直肠癌肝转移的安全性及近期预后分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 528-530.
[8] 李关宁, 杨俊杰, 杨振淮. 腹腔镜下腹会阴直肠癌手术中两种乙状结肠造口的临床比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 546-549.
[9] 孙畅, 臧春宝. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及对血清胃泌素和胃动素的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 493-496.
[10] 周红娟, 肖春龙, 王波, 冯传涛, 赵伟, 周曦. 不同麻醉方式对老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者麻醉效果的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 502-505.
[11] 狐鸣, 马世勋, 杨婧, 田宏伟, 詹渭鹏, 苗长丰, 房伟, 陈东东, 景武堂, 郭进, 邓渊, 黄显斌, 马云涛, 蔡辉. 吸引器在达芬奇机器人"3+2"辅助胃癌根治术中的应用体会[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 260-264.
[12] 姜琪琪, 丰义宽, 张凯, 李倩, 季万胜. Δ133p53在rmhTNF干预人胃癌细胞MKN-45移植瘤生长中的作用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 215-219.
[13] 姚哲放, 王美霞, 赵兰, 王彩虹, 王亚丽. 老年重症患者蛋白质供给量与预后的相关性[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 347-352.
[14] 周君, 石星原, 张庆玲, 刘向辉, 郭运林, 张之营, 张建. 颅骨修补术后癫痫发作的预后分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 356-359.
[15] 金雪红, 裴少芳, 张红, 姚潇涵, 顾永泉. 急性缺血性脑卒中血栓负荷的影响因素及其与临床转归的相关性[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 308-313.
阅读次数
全文


摘要