切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04): 221 -225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.04.006

论著 上一篇    下一篇

胸腔镜前纵隔肿物切除术两种入路方式的对比分析
郭俊唐 1 , ( ), 王彬 1, 申磊磊 2, 梁朝阳 1, 刘阳 1   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心胸外科
    2. 572014 三亚,解放军总医院海南医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-23 出版日期:2021-10-08
  • 通信作者: 郭俊唐

Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors via subxiphoid and lateral intercostal approaches

Juntang Guo 1 , ( ), Bin Wang 1, Leilei Shen 2, Chaoyang Liang 1, Yang Liu 1   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Medical Center, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Hainan Hospital, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572014, China
  • Received:2021-06-23 Published:2021-10-08
  • Corresponding author: Juntang Guo
目的

探讨经剑突肋缘下入路胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤手术的安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性分析解放军总医院第一医学中心胸外科2017年7月至2021年5月收治的54例前纵隔肿瘤切除患者(经剑突下组)的临床资料,选取同期在解放军总医院第一医学中心行经肋间入路的前纵隔肿物切除患者54例作为对照组(经肋间组)。对比两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后带管时间、术后引流量、术后2 d和术后3个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、术后并发症的差异。

结果

经剑突下组与经肋间组在术中出血量、术后带管时间及术后引流量方面,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但在手术时间、术后2 d疼痛分数方面,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经剑突下后期组与经肋间后期组对比分析,两组在术后带管时间、术后引流量、术后2 d VAS方面,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而手术时间、术中出血量方面,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组间术后3个月VAS分数,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

经剑突肋缘下胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤术中有更良好的手术视野和手术安全性,术后疼痛明显减轻;度过20余例学习曲线后,术后带管时间及引流量明显减少,在加速康复方面较经肋间组有明显优势。

Objective

To explore the safety and availability of video-assisted thoracic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors via subxiphoid.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed with anterior mediastinal tumors undertaken VATS resection via subxiphoid or lateral intercostal approaches from Jul. 2017 to May 2021 in the PLA General Hospital. Each group included 54 patients. The clinical characteristics and early surgical outcomes of these patients were reviewed and analyzed.

Results

Patients in the subxiphoid approach group had more myasthenia gravis (MG) than that in the intercostal group. There was no significant difference in the maximal tumor diameter between two groups. One patient of 54 patients in the subxiphoid approach group was switched to sternotomy due to the serious invading left innominate vein of a thymic carcinoma. Compared with the lateral intercostal approach, the duration of the procedure via the subxiphoid approach was significantly longer (P<0.05), the pain scores on postoperative days 2 was significantly lower (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss, duration of chest drainage and postoperative drainage volume between two groups. However, in the later stage subgroup of the subxiphoid approach, duration of chest drainage, postoperative drainage volume and postoperative pain were significantly lower than those in lateral intercostal approach. There was no significant difference in the operative duration and the intraoperative blood loss between the later stage subgroup of the subxiphoid approach and contemporary lateral intercostal approach group. Patients in subxiphoid approach group had lower postoperative pain than those in lateral intercoastal group on postoperative 3 months(P<0.05).

Conclusions

Video-assisted thoracic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors via subxiphoid had a good surgical field of vision and safety. After getting through the learning curve of about 20 cases, the subxiphoid approach has faster recovery after surgery with advantages of shorter duration of chest drainage, less postoperative drainage volume and better quality of life compared with the lateral intercoastal approach.

图1 经剑突下入路前纵隔肿物切除后的解剖显露
图2 经剑突下切除的完整标本
表1 两组胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤手术的临床资料基线
表2 两组胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤手术的手术结果( ±s)
表3 两组胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤手术的手术效果( ±s)
1
王贵刚,陈椿,郑炜,等. 电视胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺瘤75例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志201313(7):581-582.
2
Lu Q, Zhao J, Wang J, et al. Subxiphoid and subcostal arch "three ports" thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis[J]. J Thorac Dis, 201810(3):1711-1720.
3
Numanami H, Yano M, Yamaji M, et al. Thoracoscopic thymectomy using a subxiphoid approach for anterior mediastinal tumors[J]. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 201824(2):65-72.
4
Suda T, Ishizawa H, Nagano H, et al. Early outcomes in 147 consecutive cases of subxiphoid single-port thymectomy and evaluation of learning curves[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg202058(1):44-49.
5
Mao Y, Lan Y, Cui F, et al. Comparison of different surgical approaches for anterior mediastinal tumor[J]. J Thorac Dis202012(10):5430-5439.
6
Ye B, Li W, Ge XX. et al. Surgical treatment of early-stage thymomas: robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus transsternal thymectomy[J]. Surg Endosc201428(1):122-126.
7
Deeb ME BC, Kucharzuk J, Shrager JB, et al. Expanded indications for transcervical thymectomy in the management of anterior mediastinal masses[J]. Ann Thorac Surg200172(1):208-211.
8
陈舒晨,余绍斌,林济红,等. 经剑突下入路胸腔镜下前纵隔肿瘤切除术学习曲线分析[J]. 福建医科大学学报201751(5):311-315.
9
张雷,贡会源,王彪,等. 经剑突下入路胸腔镜胸腺切除的解剖基础与临床分析[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志202025(6):657-661.
10
Chen X, Ma Q, Wang X, et al. Subxiphoid and subcostal thoracoscopic surgical approach for thymectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 202035(9):5239-5246.
11
Qiu Z, Chen L, Lin Q, et al. Perioperative outcomes and mid-term effects in performing video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: subxiphoid versus right thoracic approaches[J]. J Thorac Dis, 202012(4):1529-1539.
12
Shiomi K, Kitamura E, Ono M, et al. Feasible and promising modified trans-subxiphoid thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for patients with myasthenia gravis[J]. J Thorac Dis, 201810(3):1747-1752.
13
郭少鸣,蒋家好,金淳,等. 改良剑突下入路胸腔镜前纵隔畸胎瘤切除术的临床应用分析[J]. 中国临床医学201926(1):43-45.
14
许洪磊,王兴,姜格宁,等. 剑突下扩大胸腺切除对于经选择的Masaoka Ⅲ期胸腺肿瘤手术的探索[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志202036(11):647-651.
15
Suda T. Subxiphoid thymectomy: single-port, dual-port, and robot-assisted[J]. J Vis Surg20173:75.
[1] 王伟, 王坤, 孙涛, 茹玉航, 刘晓. 血清肝素结合蛋白、C-反应蛋白和降钙素原对肺癌电视胸腔镜术后肺部细菌感染的预测价值[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 257-262.
[2] 李全, 张景华, 宋冀涛, 杨小华. 改良经胸入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的临床效果及安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 73-76.
[3] 韩焱楠, 李春磊, 李民华. 单孔胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸患者术后血气指标及生活质量的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 459-461.
[4] 尉腊革, 李毅, 张建辉, 刘彦军, 李东迂, 栾中华. 单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术后不同胸腔引流液量时拔管的康复分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 478-480.
[5] 吴勇, 陈健, 李成洁, 陈爱鸾, 沈伯雄. 不同浓度瑞芬太尼对胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者围手术期免疫功能及肺功能的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 508-510.
[6] 刘春宏, 尹利群, 刘夏曦, 王中清, 胡庆波, 杨晓云. 纳布啡超前镇痛对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者术后认知功能及PMN、ADP的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 355-357.
[7] 陈众众, 刘家昌, 徐兴祥, 闵凌峰. 内科胸腔镜联合快速现场评估对不明原因胸腔积液的诊断价值[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 135-140.
[8] 郭志鹏, 王晓霞, 黄太满. 不同麻醉方式对胸腔镜肺部手术患者呼吸及疼痛的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 216-218.
[9] 鲁静, 金慧玉, 王振华, 龚太乾, 宋伟安, 张静, 范博士. 快速康复外科在单孔胸腔镜肺癌围手术期的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 242-244.
[10] 姜雪, 王淑萍, 郝尚婷. ERAS管理模式在单孔镜肺叶切除患者中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(01): 105-107.
[11] 莫安胜, 关汉斌, 冯志强, 王蕊蕊, 覃明慧. 剑突及肋弓下三切口胸腔镜手术技术及改进[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 187-192.
[12] 孙志娟, 刘景峰, 张静阳, 郝洪军. 四种抗体阳性重症肌无力合并类风湿性关节炎的病例特征分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 30-34.
[13] 任占良, 张泳, 任小朋, 贺太平, 任占丽. 自发性气胸伴叶外型肺隔离症外科治疗1例[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2021, 08(03): 190-193.
[14] 张树亮, 高鹏强, 蔡炳强, 陈椿, 郑炜, 郑斌. 单孔胸腔镜下肺叶与肺段切除术在高龄早期肺癌患者中短期临床疗效[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 95-100.
[15] 刘博豪, 王泓懿, 范坤, 赵恒, 李益行, 陶润仪, 王芝馀, 温小鹏, 付军科, 张佳, 张广健. 单拉钩胸骨悬吊法在前纵隔肿瘤患者中的应用[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 6-11.
阅读次数
全文


摘要