切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 221 -225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.04.006

论著

胸腔镜前纵隔肿物切除术两种入路方式的对比分析
郭俊唐1,(), 王彬1, 申磊磊2, 梁朝阳1, 刘阳1   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心胸外科
    2. 572014 三亚,解放军总医院海南医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-23 出版日期:2021-10-08
  • 通信作者: 郭俊唐

Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors via subxiphoid and lateral intercostal approaches

Juntang Guo1,(), Bin Wang1, Leilei Shen2, Chaoyang Liang1, Yang Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Medical Center, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Hainan Hospital, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572014, China
  • Received:2021-06-23 Published:2021-10-08
  • Corresponding author: Juntang Guo
引用本文:

郭俊唐, 王彬, 申磊磊, 梁朝阳, 刘阳. 胸腔镜前纵隔肿物切除术两种入路方式的对比分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 221-225.

Juntang Guo, Bin Wang, Leilei Shen, Chaoyang Liang, Yang Liu. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors via subxiphoid and lateral intercostal approaches[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 14(04): 221-225.

目的

探讨经剑突肋缘下入路胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤手术的安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性分析解放军总医院第一医学中心胸外科2017年7月至2021年5月收治的54例前纵隔肿瘤切除患者(经剑突下组)的临床资料,选取同期在解放军总医院第一医学中心行经肋间入路的前纵隔肿物切除患者54例作为对照组(经肋间组)。对比两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后带管时间、术后引流量、术后2 d和术后3个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、术后并发症的差异。

结果

经剑突下组与经肋间组在术中出血量、术后带管时间及术后引流量方面,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但在手术时间、术后2 d疼痛分数方面,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经剑突下后期组与经肋间后期组对比分析,两组在术后带管时间、术后引流量、术后2 d VAS方面,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而手术时间、术中出血量方面,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组间术后3个月VAS分数,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

经剑突肋缘下胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤术中有更良好的手术视野和手术安全性,术后疼痛明显减轻;度过20余例学习曲线后,术后带管时间及引流量明显减少,在加速康复方面较经肋间组有明显优势。

Objective

To explore the safety and availability of video-assisted thoracic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors via subxiphoid.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed with anterior mediastinal tumors undertaken VATS resection via subxiphoid or lateral intercostal approaches from Jul. 2017 to May 2021 in the PLA General Hospital. Each group included 54 patients. The clinical characteristics and early surgical outcomes of these patients were reviewed and analyzed.

Results

Patients in the subxiphoid approach group had more myasthenia gravis (MG) than that in the intercostal group. There was no significant difference in the maximal tumor diameter between two groups. One patient of 54 patients in the subxiphoid approach group was switched to sternotomy due to the serious invading left innominate vein of a thymic carcinoma. Compared with the lateral intercostal approach, the duration of the procedure via the subxiphoid approach was significantly longer (P<0.05), the pain scores on postoperative days 2 was significantly lower (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss, duration of chest drainage and postoperative drainage volume between two groups. However, in the later stage subgroup of the subxiphoid approach, duration of chest drainage, postoperative drainage volume and postoperative pain were significantly lower than those in lateral intercostal approach. There was no significant difference in the operative duration and the intraoperative blood loss between the later stage subgroup of the subxiphoid approach and contemporary lateral intercostal approach group. Patients in subxiphoid approach group had lower postoperative pain than those in lateral intercoastal group on postoperative 3 months(P<0.05).

Conclusions

Video-assisted thoracic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors via subxiphoid had a good surgical field of vision and safety. After getting through the learning curve of about 20 cases, the subxiphoid approach has faster recovery after surgery with advantages of shorter duration of chest drainage, less postoperative drainage volume and better quality of life compared with the lateral intercoastal approach.

图1 经剑突下入路前纵隔肿物切除后的解剖显露
图2 经剑突下切除的完整标本
表1 两组胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤手术的临床资料基线
表2 两组胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤手术的手术结果(±s)
表3 两组胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤手术的手术效果(±s)
1
王贵刚,陈椿,郑炜,等. 电视胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺瘤75例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志201313(7):581-582.
2
Lu Q, Zhao J, Wang J, et al. Subxiphoid and subcostal arch "three ports" thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis[J]. J Thorac Dis, 201810(3):1711-1720.
3
Numanami H, Yano M, Yamaji M, et al. Thoracoscopic thymectomy using a subxiphoid approach for anterior mediastinal tumors[J]. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 201824(2):65-72.
4
Suda T, Ishizawa H, Nagano H, et al. Early outcomes in 147 consecutive cases of subxiphoid single-port thymectomy and evaluation of learning curves[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg202058(1):44-49.
5
Mao Y, Lan Y, Cui F, et al. Comparison of different surgical approaches for anterior mediastinal tumor[J]. J Thorac Dis202012(10):5430-5439.
6
Ye B, Li W, Ge XX. et al. Surgical treatment of early-stage thymomas: robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus transsternal thymectomy[J]. Surg Endosc201428(1):122-126.
7
Deeb ME BC, Kucharzuk J, Shrager JB, et al. Expanded indications for transcervical thymectomy in the management of anterior mediastinal masses[J]. Ann Thorac Surg200172(1):208-211.
8
陈舒晨,余绍斌,林济红,等. 经剑突下入路胸腔镜下前纵隔肿瘤切除术学习曲线分析[J]. 福建医科大学学报201751(5):311-315.
9
张雷,贡会源,王彪,等. 经剑突下入路胸腔镜胸腺切除的解剖基础与临床分析[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志202025(6):657-661.
10
Chen X, Ma Q, Wang X, et al. Subxiphoid and subcostal thoracoscopic surgical approach for thymectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 202035(9):5239-5246.
11
Qiu Z, Chen L, Lin Q, et al. Perioperative outcomes and mid-term effects in performing video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: subxiphoid versus right thoracic approaches[J]. J Thorac Dis, 202012(4):1529-1539.
12
Shiomi K, Kitamura E, Ono M, et al. Feasible and promising modified trans-subxiphoid thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for patients with myasthenia gravis[J]. J Thorac Dis, 201810(3):1747-1752.
13
郭少鸣,蒋家好,金淳,等. 改良剑突下入路胸腔镜前纵隔畸胎瘤切除术的临床应用分析[J]. 中国临床医学201926(1):43-45.
14
许洪磊,王兴,姜格宁,等. 剑突下扩大胸腺切除对于经选择的Masaoka Ⅲ期胸腺肿瘤手术的探索[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志202036(11):647-651.
15
Suda T. Subxiphoid thymectomy: single-port, dual-port, and robot-assisted[J]. J Vis Surg20173:75.
[1] 杨轲, 丁增巴姆, 马静, 李盼盼, 陈婷. 全程无缝隙肺康复训练在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 801-804.
[2] 张卫锋, 张天翼, 赵正维, 王海强, 尹逊亮. VE /VCO2 斜率对肺癌肺叶切除术后心血管并发症的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 725-730.
[3] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[4] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[5] 王冲, 闫东杰, 龚昌帆, 韩毅. 三维重建辅助胸腔镜胸膜剥脱术治疗包裹性脓胸的思路和技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 164-167.
[6] 申宏, 成楠, 杨博, 申华, 张林, 李东, 李梁钢, 董士勇, 姜胜利. 全胸腔镜同期心肺联合手术治疗主动脉瓣关闭不全合并原发性肺癌[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 160-163.
[7] 赵超, 史帝, 王暖, 陈国芳. 肯尼迪病合并血清抗体阴性重症肌无力一例[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 236-240.
[8] 陈轶维, 吴近近, 李奋, 孙彦隽, 郁夏风. 儿童左心耳起源房性心动过速镶嵌治疗一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 185-188.
[9] 陈小科, 吴晗, 丁征平. 胸腔镜下右肺上叶前段切除术[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 261-261.
[10] 蔡剑桥, 蒋雷. 单孔胸腔镜与开胸双袖式肺叶切除治疗非小细胞肺癌对比[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 225-230.
[11] 王嘉巍, 张广健, 杜昊楠, 余宸傲, 张佳. 混合现实技术在肺结节手术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 254-259.
[12] 沈海锋, 吕方伊, 顾海华, 常志博, 陈盈, 王苹莉, 吴祖群, 邱福铭, 姚杰, 范军强. 局部进展期肺癌新辅助治疗后胸腔镜袖式肺叶切除术——浙江大学医学院附属第二医院2014—2023年56例回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 158-166.
[13] 裴耀飞, 耿俊峰, 王擎, 徐彪, 邹勤光, 张俊, 刘洋, 李志刚. 单孔胸腔镜右肺上叶S2切除术[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 208-208.
[14] 赵臣亮, 汪杨, 吴晗, 杨运海, 陈天翔. 单孔胸腔镜下纵隔淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 109-114.
[15] 莫安胜, 王国正, 宾能康, 郑昌泽. 剑突下入路胸腔镜纵隔手术技术及其进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 130-142.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?