切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 37 -43. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.01.009

所属专题： 文献；

论著

腹腔镜对比开腹远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的Meta分析
贾勇1, 刘红阳1, 张宾儒1, 李林峰1, 王浩年1, 陈华1,†(), 孙备1   
  1. 1. 150001　哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院胰胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-16 出版日期:2021-02-28
  • 通信作者: 陈华

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a Meta-analysis

Yong Jia1, Hongyang Liu1, Binru Zhang1, Linfeng Li1, Haonian Wang1, Hua Chen1,†(), Bei Sun1   

  1. 1. Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2020-12-16 Published:2021-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Hua Chen
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

贾勇, 刘红阳, 张宾儒, 李林峰, 王浩年, 陈华, 孙备. 腹腔镜对比开腹远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(01): 37-43.

Yong Jia, Hongyang Liu, Binru Zhang, Linfeng Li, Haonian Wang, Hua Chen, Bei Sun. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a Meta-analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 14(01): 37-43.

目的

对比腹腔镜及开腹远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌(pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma ，PDAC)的疗效及安全性。

方法

检索2020年10月前公开发表的比较腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy，LDP)与开腹远端胰腺切除术(open distal pancreatectomy，ODP)治疗PDAC的临床研究。经过筛选，对纳入文献进行质量评价及数据提取，然后使用review manager(RevMan)5.3软件进行统计分析。

结果

共计15项研究，5 343例患者纳入本研究(LDP组1 396例，ODP组3 947例)。LDP组的术中出血量低[加权均数差(weighted mean difference, WMD)＝-112.44，95%置信区间(confidence interval, CI)：-193.06～-31.82，P＝0.006]、输血率低(OR＝0.33，95%CI：0.23～0.49，P<0.000 01)、住院时间短(WMD＝-3.35，95%CI：-4.57～-2.13，P<0.000 01)、R0切除率高(OR＝1.30，95%CI：1.04～1.64，P＝0.02)、3年生存率高(HR＝0.84，95%CI：0.76～0.92，P＝0.000 4)以及5年生存率高(HR＝0.82，95%CI：0.74～0.92，P＝0.000 8)。

结论

治疗胰体尾部PDAC时，LDP相较于ODP在术中出血量、输血率以及住院时间方面更具有优势，同时也有着不弱于ODP的肿瘤学结局。鉴于本研究的局限性，此结果仍需要大样本前瞻性随机对照研究证实。

关键词: 腹腔镜, 远端胰腺切除术, 胰腺癌, Meta分析
Objective

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

The published clinical studies including laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP) and open distal pancreatectomy(ODP) in treatment of pancreatic ductal adneocarcinoma(PDAC) before Oct. 2020 were reviewed. After screening, the included literature was subjected to quality evaluation and data extraction, and then, statistical analysis was performed using review manager(RevMan) 5.3 software.

Results

Fifteen studies with a total of 5 343 patients(1 396 in LDP and 3 947 in ODP) were included for the meta-analysis.LDP showed less blood loss(weighted mean difference, WMD)=-112.44, 95%CI(confidence interval, CI): -193.06-31.82, P=0.006), lower blood transfusion rate(OR=0.33, 95%CI: 0.23-0.49, P<0.000 01), shorter hospitalization time(WMD=-3.35, 95%CI: -4.57--2.13, P<0.000 01), higher R0 resection rate(OR=1.30, 95%CI: 1.04-1.64, P=0.02), higher 3-year overall survival(HR=0.84, 95%CI: 0.76-0.92, P=0.000 4) and 5-year overall survival(HR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.74-0.92, P=0.000 8).

Conclusions

LDP has advantages over ODP in terms of intraoperative bleeding, transfusion rates, and length of stay in the treatment of PDAC in the body and tail of the pancreas, and also has oncologic outcomes that are not inferior to those of ODP.Given the limitations of this study, this result still needs to be confirmed in a large prospective randomized controlled study.

Key words: Laparoscopy, Distal pancreatectomy, Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Meta-analysis
图1 文献筛选流程
表1 纳入文献的NOS评价表
作者 年份 评分(分) 总评分(分)
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧
Kooby等[14] 2010 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Hu等[15] 2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Rehamn等[16] 2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Braga等[17] 2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 6
Lee等[18] 2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 6
Shin等[19] 2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Sulipice等[20] 2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Zhang等[21] 2015 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Stauffer等[22] 2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Joliat等[23] 2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 6
Wellner等[24] 2017 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 7
Zhang等[25] 2017 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Jarufe等[26] 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Chen等[27] 2020 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Watson等[28] 2020 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
表2 部分统计结果
结局指标 纳入研究数量 异质性 总体结果 95%CI P值
P值 I2值
年龄 8 0.007 64% WMD＝-1.68 -3.96～0.61 0.15
体质量指数 7 0.009 65% WMD＝0.66 -0.05～1.36 0.07
手术时间 8 <0.000 1 79% WMD＝5.21 -16.97～27.38 0.65
术后胰瘘 5 0.970 0% OR＝1.69 0.99～2.91 0.06
临床相关胰瘘 6 0.550 0% OR＝1.12 0.62～2.01 0.70
Clavien-DindoⅢ级以上并发症发生率 4 0.330 12% OR＝0.60 0.29～1.22 0.16
术后辅助治疗时间 3 0.004 82% WMD＝-4.33 -9.46～0.81 0.10
术后辅助化疗患者例数 5 0.720 0% OR＝1.11 0.91～1.34 0.30
图2 森林图
图3 漏斗图
1
Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas[J]. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 1994, 39(3): 178-184.
2
Sahakyan MA, Kim SC, Kleive D, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term oncologic outcomes after standard resection[J]. Surgery (United States), 2017, 162(4): 802-811.
3
Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer[J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016, 4(4): CD011391. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189631
4
Rooij T, Besselink MG, Shamali A, et al. Pan-european survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer[J]. HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2016, 18(2): 170-176.
5
Kwon W, Jang JY, Park JW, et al. Which method of pancreatic surgery do medical consumers prefer among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery: a survey[J]. Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2014, 86(1): 7-15.
6
Hilst J, Korrel M, Rooij T, et al. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 45(5): 719-727.
7
Yang DJ, Xiong JJ, Lu HM, et al. The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Scientific reports, 2019, 9(1): 1159. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37617-0.
8
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample[J]. BMC medical research methodology, 2005, 5: 13. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13.
9
Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, et al. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis[J]. Trials, 2007, 8: 16. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-16.
10
Bauman MD, Becerra DG, Kilbane EM, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective[J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2018, 32(1): 53-61.
11
Kantor O, Bryan DS, Talamonti MS, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for cancer provides oncologic outcomes and overall survival identical to open distal pancreatectomy[J]. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017, 21(10): 1620-1625.
12
Raoof M, Ituarte PHG, Woo Y, et al. Propensity score-matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection[J]. The British journal of surgery, 2018, 105(5): 578-586.
13
Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang E, et al. The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes[J]. American journal of surgery, 2015, 209(3): 557-563.
14
Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, et al. A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2010, 210(5): 779-785.
15
Hu M, Zhao G, Wang F, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal splenopancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer: a retrospective, mid-term follow-up study at a single academic tertiary care institution[J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2014, 28(9): 2584-2591.
16
Rehman S, John SK, Lochan R, et al. Oncological feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: a single-institution comparative study[J]. World journal of surgery, 2014, 38(2): 476-483.
17
Braga M, Pecorelli N, Ferrari D, et al. Results of 100 consecutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: postoperative outcome, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment[J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2015, 29(7): 1871-1878.
18
Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution′s experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015, 220(1): 18-27.
19
Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB, et al. A comparative study of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015, 220(2): 177-185.
20
Sulpice L, Farges O, Goutte N, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J]. Annals of surgery, 2015, 262(5): 868-874.
21
Zhang M, Fang R, Mou Y, et al. LDP vs ODP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case matched study from a single-institution[J]. BMC gastroenterology, 2015, 15(1): 1-8.
22
Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Mody K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J]. World journal of surgery, 2016, 40(6): 1477-1484.
23
Joliat GR, Demartines N, Halkic N, et al. Short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy: laparotomy vs. laparoscopy - a single-center series[J]. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2017, 13(3): 1-5.
24
Wellner UF, Lapshyn H, Bartsch DK, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy—a propensity score-matched analysis from the german studoq|pancreas registry[J]. International journal of colorectal disease, 2017, 32(2): 273-280.
25
Zhang AB, Wang Y, Hu C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science B, 2017, 18(6): 532-538.
26
Jarufe N, Soto P, Ahumada V, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: comparative analysis of clinical outcomes at a single institution[J]. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, 2018, 28(1): 62-66.
27
Chen K, Tong Q, Yan JF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching study[J]. Updates in surgery, 2020, 72(2): 387-397.
28
Watson MD, Baimas-George MR, Thompson KJ, et al. Improved oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive left pancreatectomy: propensity-score matched analysis of the national cancer database[J]. Journal of surgical oncology, 2020, 122(7): 1-10.
29
Björnsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C, et al. Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial[J]. The British journal of surgery, 2020, 107(10): 1281-1288.
30
Sahakyan MA, Kim SC, Kleive D, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term oncologic outcomes after standard resection[J]. Surgery, 2017, 162(4): 802-811.
31
Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta chirurgica Belgica, 2018, 118(5): 278-286.
32
Kazaryan AM, Solberg I, Aghayan DL, et al. Does tumor size influence the outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy[J]. HPB, 2020, 22(9): 1280-1287.
33
Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy[J]. Surgery, 2003, 133(5): 521-527.
34
Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer[J]. World journal of surgery, 2016, 40(9): 2267-2275.
35
Kim EY, Hong TH. Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes[J]. BMC surgery, 2017, 17(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-016-0200-z
36
Kiguchi G, Sugioka A, Kato Y, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with regional lymphadenectomy through retroperitoneal-first laparoscopic approach (Retlap) for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer[J]. Surgical oncology, 2020, 35: 301-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.07.008
37
Harlaar JJ, Gosselink MP, Hop WC, et al. Blood transfusions and prognosis in colorectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Annals of surgery, 2012, 256(5): 681-686.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号