机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术在高龄患者的应用

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.01.003

目的

探讨达芬奇机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy，RPD)在高龄患者的安全性及临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2016年12月至2020年5月于中山大学附属第一医院胆胰外科接受RPD、年龄≥70岁患者的临床资料，分析术后转归。

结果

共16例年龄≥70岁的患者接受RPD，其中男9例、女7例；年龄70～85岁，平均(73.6±4.2)岁。所有患者均顺利完成RPD，无中转开腹。病因包括6例壶腹癌、6例胰腺导管腺癌、1例胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤、1例胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤、1例十二指肠乳头癌、1例十二指肠乳头腺瘤伴高级别上皮内瘤变。中位手术时间413 min(IQR：366～522 min)，中位术中出血量50 ml(IQR：50～62.5 ml)，16例患者均获得R0切除。3例(18.8%)患者术后发生并发症，包括1例(6.2%)术后早期胰肠吻合口出血，通过再手术止血；3例(18.8%)B级胰瘘合并腹腔内感染；1例(6.2%)胃排空延迟。无围手术期死亡。中位术后住院时间13 d(IQR：12～18 d)。

结论

RPD对于高龄患者安全可靠，近期治疗效果满意。

关键词: 机器人, 胰十二指肠切除术, 高龄患者

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in the elderly patients.

Methods

The clinicopathological data of 16 patients who were over 70 years old and underwent robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy between Dec.2016 and May 2020 at Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

There were 9 males and 7 females, with the mean age of (73.6±4.2)years (from 70 to 85 years). Robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy was successfully completed in all 16 patients, with no conversion. In etiologies, there were 6 cases of ampullay carcinoma, 6 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 1 case of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, 1 case of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, 1 case of duodenal papillary carcinoma and 1 case of duodenal papillary adenoma with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. The median operative time was 413 min(IQR: 366-522 min)and the median intraoperative blood loss was 50 ml(IQR: 50-62.5 ml). Curative resection was achieved in all 16 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (18.8%), including pancreatojejunostomy bleeding in 1 patient (6.2%), which was successfully managed by reoperation; grade B postoperative pancreatic fistula with intra-abdominal infection in 3 patients (18.8%); and delay gastric emptying in 1 (6.2%). There was no perioperative mortality. The median postoperative hospitalization duration was 13 d (IQR: 12-18 d).

Conclusions

The robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and reliable procedure in the elderly patients, with good short-term outcome.

Key words: Robotic, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, The elderly patients

图1 达芬奇机器人系统辅助进行胰十二指肠切除术Trocar示意

图2 间接架桥式胰肠吻合术

表1 16例达芬奇机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术患者的术后最终病理结果

病理分类	例数	肿瘤直径(cm)
壶腹癌	6	1.9(1.5～4.5)
胰腺导管腺癌	6	2.9(1.7～5.0)
胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤	1	2.2
胰管乳头状黏液性肿瘤	1	4.0
十二指肠乳头癌	1	1.5
十二指肠乳头高级别上皮内瘤变	1	1.0

表1 16例达芬奇机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术患者的术后最终病理结果

病理分类	例数	肿瘤直径(cm)
壶腹癌	6	1.9(1.5～4.5)
胰腺导管腺癌	6	2.9(1.7～5.0)
胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤	1	2.2
胰管乳头状黏液性肿瘤	1	4.0
十二指肠乳头癌	1	1.5
十二指肠乳头高级别上皮内瘤变	1	1.0

1	Pedziwiatr M, Malczak P, Mizera M, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head tumors in the elderly - systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Oncol, 2018, 27(3): 346-364.
2	Magge D, Zureikat A, Hogg M, et al. Minimally invasive approaches to pancreatic surgery[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2016, 25(2): 273-286.
3	Cai J, Ramanathan R, Zenati MS, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with decreased clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas: a propensity-matched analysis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(5): 1111-1118.
4	Kowalsky SJ, Zenati MS, Steve J, et al. A combination of robotic approach and eras pathway optimizes outcomes and cost for pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(6): 1138-1145.
5	Rayar M, Sulpice L, Meunier B, et al. Enteral nutrition reduces delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy with child reconstruction[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(5): 1004-1011.
6	Doula C, Kostakis LD, Damaskos C, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive and open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016, 26(1): 6-16.
7	Pedziwiatr M, Malczak P, Pisarska M, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017, 402(5): 841-851.
8	Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched study from a national cohort of patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(1): 151-157.
9	Liang Y, Zhao L, Jiang C, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(5): 2028-2034.
10	Magge D, Zenati M, Lutfi W, et al. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy at an experienced institution is not associated with an increased risk of post-pancreatic hemorrhage[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2018, 20(5): 448-455.
11	Liu Q, Zhao Z, Gao Y, et al. Novel single-layer continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2020 , 27(2): 56-63.
12	Kawabata Y, Tanaka T, Ishikawa N, et al. Modified total mesopancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy as a mesopancreatic plane surgery in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2016, 42(5): 698-705.
13	Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, Ishikawa N, et al. Total mesopancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy in lower biliary tract cancer[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016, 401(4): 463-469.
14	Sutton JM, Kooby DA, Wilson GC, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion is associated with decreased survival in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional study[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2014, 18(9): 1575-1587.
15	Bian AZL, Fuks D, Montali F, et al. Predicting the severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: overweight and blood loss as independent risk factors: retrospective analysis of 277 patients[J]. Surgical Infections, 2019, 20(6): 486-491.
16	Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y, et al. A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(4): 640-649.
17	Orti-Rodríguez, Rafael J, Rahman SH. A comparative review between laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2014 , 24(2): 103-108.

[1]	徐俊明, 张欣雪, 曹爽, 刘喆, 马军, 寇建涛, 贺强. 胰头癌患者术后预后评价及相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 331-335.
[2]	池畔. 腔镜与机器人保留部分邓氏筋膜TME[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 0-.
[3]	丁相元, 任效瑛, 闫慧明. 微创胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌围手术期和近远期疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 313-320.
[4]	池畔. 腔镜与机器人保留部分邓氏筋膜TME[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 287-287.
[5]	武玉强, 周载平, 孙强, 何坤, 胡泽民. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术单中心临床分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 215-217.
[6]	王素, 孙振青, 苏萌萌, 王东升, 宋保连, 栾响, 王萍. 机器人与传统腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术近期疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 234-240.
[7]	李海寿, 尹林, 黄子健, 韦合雷, 莫毓. 胰十二指肠切除术中两种胰肠吻合方式的临床对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 396-399.
[8]	吴迪, 闫志风, 佘宇佳, 张妮娜, 孟元光. 达芬奇机器人系统在超重肥胖妇科恶性肿瘤患者治疗中的优势分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 206-210.
[9]	苏英杰, 窦磊, 田东立, 芦恩婷, 张颐. 全脏器反位患者机器人辅助下宫颈癌根治术一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 245-247.
[10]	袁昌巍, 李志华, 王杰, 樊书菠, 熊盛炜, 杨昆霖, 李学松, 周利群. 侧卧位经腹入路国产康多机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 239-240.
[11]	金贝贝, 张玉泉, 李季, 高赛楠, 朱春玉, 丁晓颖, 杨晓清. 普通及机器人辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜在子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 163-167.
[12]	李国林, 王秀, 陈桂婵, 邱逸红. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术围手术期标准化管理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 510-513.
[13]	高建平, 李爽, 孙震, 祁冰, 张庆凯, 张桂信, 尚东. 术前减黄在中度恶性梗阻性黄疸胰十二指肠切除中的价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 381-385.
[14]	周启阳, 何宋兵, 胡优, 陈昕, 周晓俊. 单孔加一机器人辅助腹腔镜右半结肠切除术（附视频）[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 445-448.
[15]	汤庆超, 王锡山. 浅谈应用达芬奇机器人手术平台开展直肠癌NOSES手术的优越性和局限性[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 343-350.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in the elderly patients

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in the elderly patients