切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 212 -217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.04.005

所属专题： 文献；

论著

内镜下经腹Sublay修补术在腹壁疝治疗中的应用
汤睿1, 吴卫东2, 蒋会勇3, 朱晓强1, 柳楠1, 王涛4,†()   
  1. 1. 200120　上海，同济大学附属东方医院疝与腹壁外科
    2. 200080　上海交通大学医学院附属第一人民医院胃肠外科
    3. 110015　沈阳，东北国际医院普外科二科
    4. 255036　临淄市中心医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-26 出版日期:2020-08-30
  • 通信作者: 王涛

Endoscopic trans-abdominal sublay repair for the surgical treatment of ventral hernia

Rui Tang1, Weidong Wu2, Huiyong Jiang3, Xiaoqiang Zhu1, Nan Liu1, Tao Wang4,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China
    3. Department Two of General Surgery, Northeast International Hospital, Shenyang, Shenyang 110015, China
    4. Department of General Surgery, Linzi Central Hospital, Zibo, Shandong Province, Zibo 255036, China
  • Received:2020-06-26 Published:2020-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Tao Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Tao, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

汤睿, 吴卫东, 蒋会勇, 朱晓强, 柳楠, 王涛. 内镜下经腹Sublay修补术在腹壁疝治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(04): 212-217.

Rui Tang, Weidong Wu, Huiyong Jiang, Xiaoqiang Zhu, Nan Liu, Tao Wang. Endoscopic trans-abdominal sublay repair for the surgical treatment of ventral hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(04): 212-217.

目的

初步评估经腹Sublay修补(transabdominal sublay, TAS)修复腹壁疝的可行性、安全性和有效性，并从初步临床实践中总结其手术要点和适应证。

方法

回顾研究2016年5月至2019年5月同济大学附属东方医院等四家医院实施的21例中小型原发性腹壁疝和切口疝患者的资料，分析病例资料、疝的情况、手术细节和手术结果。

结果

21例计划实施TAS修补的患者中，19例成功完成，另2例中转完成修补。手术中位时间120 min，术后48 h绝大部分患者仅存在轻度疼痛。无术中、术后严重并发症；血清肿是最常见并发症(15.8%)，都在6个月内吸收；1例复发。

结论

初步结果表明，TAS修补对于治疗中小型原发性腹壁疝和切口疝是可行、安全、有效的；但手术耗时较长，实施手术的外科医师需要更多的耐心和技巧，但成功实施TAS可避免将补片放置入腹腔，患者术后恢复也更快。

关键词: 腹壁疝, 内镜下Sublay修补, 经腹Sublay修补, 适应证
Objective

This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of TAS(transabdominal sublay) repair for ventral hernia. Its critical surgical skills and indications are also summarized from the preliminary practice.

Methods

This retrospective study reviews 21 cases with small-to-median primary ventral or incisional hernias performed with TAS repair from 4 Chinese hospitals between May 2016 and May 2019. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative variables and surgical results were recorded and analyzed.

Results

In 21 cases, TAS repair was implemented successfully in 19 cases; in the other two cases, the repairs were completed by transferring to other procedures. The median operation during was 120 min. The most majority of the patients had only mild pain at 48 h post-operation. No severe intraoperative and postoperative complication occurred. Seroma was the most frequent complication (15.8%) and all absorbed in six months. There was one recurrence.

Conclusions

TAS repair is feasible, safe and effective for the treatment of small-medium primary ventral and incisional hernias. But the procedure takes long time and the surgeons need more patience and skills. However, the successful implement of TAS repair avoids placing the mesh in the abdominal cavity and brings quick postoperative recovery.

Key words: Ventral hernia, Endoscopic sublay repair, Trans-abdominal sublay, Indication
图1 针对不同位置的腹壁疝采用不同的穿刺孔布局方式(A～D)
图2 内镜下经腹Sublay修补术步骤
1
王明刚，李健文，李航宇. 腹腔镜腹壁切口疝的术式选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志，2018, 38(8): 132-134.
2
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(3): 407-414.
3
占小莉，王跃东. 腹腔镜腹壁疝和切口疝修补术[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 8(1): 5-7.
4
赛甫丁·艾比布拉，克力木，凯赛尔，等. 腹腔镜上腹部切口疝修补术45例临床应用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2013，6(4): 254-256.
5
Kockerling F, Simon T, Adolf D, et al. Laparoscopic ipom versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9907 patients[J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2019, 33(10): 3361-3369.
6
Michael Sosin, Nahabedian Maurice Y, Parag Bhanot. The perfect plane: a systematic review of mesh location and outcomes, update 2018[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 142 (3): 107-116.
7
蒋会勇，郭一君，张丹，等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹直肌后间隙成人脐疝修补术[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)，2018，12(1): 47-50.
8
蒋会勇，吴卫东，马锐，等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补切口疝3例[J]. 临床军医杂志，2018, 46(2): 239-240.
9
蒋会勇，汤睿，吴卫东，等．腹腔镜下完全腹膜外全腹膜分离技术在腹壁疝修补术中应用[J]. 临床军医杂志，2019, 47(1): 37-40.
10
汤睿，吴卫东. 切口疝的腹腔镜Sublay修补术[J]，腹腔镜外科杂志，2018, 23(10): 721-724.
11
汤睿，吴卫东，蒋会勇，等. 腹壁疝的内镜下Sublay修补//汤睿，吴卫东，周太成[M]．疝外科手术学，北京：科学出版社，2019, 179-195.
12
Prasad P, Tantia O, Patle NM, et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a comparative study of transabdominal preperitoneal versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2011, 21(6): 477-483.
13
Bellido Luque JA, Bellido Luque A, Gomez Menchero J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of self-adhesive mesh in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using transabdominal preperitoneal route[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(3): 1213-1218.
14
Masurkar AA. Laparoscopic trans-abdominal retromuscular (TARM) repair for ventral hernia: a novel, low-cost technique for sublay and posterior component separation[J]. World J Surg, 2020, 44(4): 1081-1085.
15
Muysoms F, Van Cleven S, Pletinckx P, et al. Robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair (TARUP): observational study on the operative time during the learning curve[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(6): 1101-1111.
16
Orthopoulos G, Kudsi OY. Feasibility of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(4): 434-438.
17
Nikolian VC, Coleman NL, Podolsky D, et al. Robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2020，36(3): 95-97.
18
Yang GPC. From intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair to preperitoneal onlay mesh repair[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2017, 10(2): 119-127.
[1] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[2] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[3] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[4] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[5] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[6] 徐杨荣, 杨毅, 王凤飞, 潘姣. 腹腔镜增强视野完全腹膜外疝修补术和腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术在腹壁疝修补中的安全性及临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 296-301.
[7] 宋延冰. 腹腔镜手术方式在嵌顿性腹壁疝中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 189-191.
[8] 赛甫丁·艾比布拉, 买买提·依斯热依力, 李义亮, 王永康, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 不同材质补片修补对腹壁疝大鼠腹横筋膜组织转化生长因子-β1及Collagen合成代谢的作用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 161-167.
[9] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[10] 孔博, 张璟, 吕珂. 超声技术在复杂腹壁疝诊治中的作用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[11] 刘琪, 王殿琛, 符洋. 复杂腹壁疝诊疗问题与要点[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 504-508.
[12] 林科灿, 罗柳平. 肝胰十二指肠切除术在胆囊癌和胆管癌应用中的关键问题[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 774-778.
[13] 席佳星, 袁志刚, 谢国丽. 缺乏囊膜支撑人工晶状体植入手术方法与术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 108-112.
[14] 牟一, 张力凡, 胡兵. 圈套器冷切除术在结直肠息肉应用中的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 253-258.
[15] 代剑华, 覃语思, 陈磊, 彭志红, 陈瑶, 刘俐, 吴宏博, 许森林, 李川, 钱锋, 彭贵勇. 术前评估超内镜治疗适应证胃癌的超级微创新选择：内镜、腔镜序贯治疗[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 217-224.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号

AI
小
编
AI小编
你好！我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编，有什么可以帮您的吗？