切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 81 -85. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2020.02.005

所属专题: 专题评论 机器人手术 文献

论著

联合血管切除重建的机器人肝胆胰手术疗效评价
赵之明1, 尹注增1, 姜楠1, 许勇1, 赵国栋1, 高元兴1, 谭向龙1, 刘荣1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心肝胆外二科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-07 出版日期:2020-04-30
  • 通信作者: 刘荣

Evaluation of the effect of the robotic hepatobiliary and pancreaticobiliary surgery combined with vascular resection and reconstruction

Zhiming Zhao1, Zhuzeng Yin1, Nan Jiang1, Yong Xu1, Guodong Zhao1, Yuanxing Gao1, Xianglong Tan1, Rong Liu1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2020-02-07 Published:2020-04-30
  • Corresponding author: Rong Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Rong, Email:
引用本文:

赵之明, 尹注增, 姜楠, 许勇, 赵国栋, 高元兴, 谭向龙, 刘荣. 联合血管切除重建的机器人肝胆胰手术疗效评价[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 81-85.

Zhiming Zhao, Zhuzeng Yin, Nan Jiang, Yong Xu, Guodong Zhao, Yuanxing Gao, Xianglong Tan, Rong Liu. Evaluation of the effect of the robotic hepatobiliary and pancreaticobiliary surgery combined with vascular resection and reconstruction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(02): 81-85.

目的

探讨联合血管切除重建的机器人肝胆胰手术的安全性及临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年10月解放军总医院第一医学中心肝胆外二科完成的14例联合血管切除重建的机器人肝胆胰手术患者的临床资料。

结果

14例手术均在机器人下顺利完成,无中转开腹,重建血管术后早期无血栓性闭塞。14例手术中联合门静脉部分切除重建10例,其中2例使用了人造血管,联合动脉部分切除重建3例,联合肝中静脉部分切除重建1例。平均手术时间(294.9±80.7)min,术中中位出血量为150 ml,术后平均住院时间(12.0±5.1)d,围手术期死亡为0。14例中13例(92.9%)达到R0切除。截至2020年1月,1例胰腺实性假乳头状瘤随访3年无复发;13例恶性肿瘤平均随访15.5个月,其中3例胰腺癌因复发死亡,中位生存期为14个月;1例肝门部胆管癌术后26个月因复发死亡,其余9例存活患者仍在随访中。

结论

机器人手术系统下联合血管切除重建是安全可行的,其肿瘤学优势尚需进一步评价。

Objective

To explore the safety and clinical effect of the robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery combined with vascular resection and reconstruction.

Methods

From Jan. 2016 to Oct. 2019, the clinical data of 14 cases of robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery with vascular resection and reconstruction completed in the second department of hepatobiliary surgery of the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

All the 14 operations were successfully completed under the daVinci robotic system, without conversion to laparotomy, and without thromboembolism occlusion in the early stage after revascularization. 10 cases were reconstructed by combined partial portal vein resection, of which 2 cases were used artificial blood vessels, 3 cases were combined with partial artery resection and reconstruction, and 1 case was combined with partial middle hepatic vein resection and reconstruction. The average operation time was (294.9 ± 80.7) min, intraoperative bleeding volume was 150 ml, postoperative average hospital stay was (12.0 ± 5.1) days, and perioperative death was 0. Among the 14 cases, 13 achieved R0 resection (92.9%). As of Jan. 2020, 1 case of solid pseudopapilloma of the pancreas has been followed up for 3 years without recurrence, and 13 cases of malignant tumors have been followed up for an average of 15.5 months. Among them, 3 cases of pancreatic cancer died due to recurrence, with a median survival period of 14 months. One case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma died due to recurrence 26 months after operation, and the remaining 9 surviving patients are still in the follow-up.

Conclusions

The combination of vascular resection and reconstruction under the daVinci robotic system is safe and feasible, and its oncology advantages need to be further evaluated.

图1 血管切除及重建
表1 术中和术后病理资料
1
Alberts SR, Gores GJ, Kim GP, et al. Treatment options for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2007,82(5):628-637.
2
Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2006,13(8):1035-1046.
3
Ravikumar R, Sabin C, Abu Hilal M, et al. Portal vein resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a united kingdom multicenter study[J]. J Am Coll Surg ,2014,218(3): 401-411.
4
Wang X, Cai Y, Zhao W, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition graft: case series[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2019,98(3):14204-14204.
5
赵舒霖,沈柏用,邓侠兴,等. 联合血管切除重建的机器人胰腺切除术治疗局部进展期胰腺癌[J]. 外科理论与实践,2018, 23(4):352-357.
6
Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, et al. Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors[J]. Pancreas, 2011, 40(8): 1264-1270.
7
Maley WR, Yeo CJ. Vascular resections during the whipple procedure[J]. Adv Surg,2017, 51(1):41-63.
8
Kasumova GG, Conway WC, Tseng JF. The role of venous and arterial resection in pancreatic cancer surgery[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2018, 25(1): 51-58.
9
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines inoncology[J]. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, 2017,15(8):1028-1061.
10
Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS)[J]. Surgery,2014, 155(6): 977-988.
11
Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, et al. Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2011, 254(6): 882-893.
12
Kasumova GG, Conway WC, Tseng JF. The role of venous and arterial resection in pancreatic cancer surgery[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018, 25(1): 1-8.
13
Rassam F, Roos E, Lienden KP, et al. Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the amc experience[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2018, 403(3): 289-307.
14
Zhang Q, Wu J, Tian Y, et al. Arterial resection and reconstruction in pancreatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes[J]. BMC Surg, 2019, 19(1):141-141.
15
Troisi RI, Pegoraro F, Giglio MC, et al. Robotic approach to the liver: open surgery in a closed abdomen or laparoscopic surgery with technical constraints[J]. Surgical oncology, 2019(online ahead of print).DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2019.10.012
16
Idrees K, Bartlett DL. Robotic liver surgery[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2010, 90(4):761-774.
17
Štádler P, Dvorácek L, Vitásek P, et al. Robot assisted aortic and non-aortic vascular operations[J]. Eur Vasc Endovasc Surg,2016, 52(1): 22-28.
[1] 张启龙, 柳亿, 卢会丽, 罗慧, 李成林, 王菁, 王辉. 奥妥珠单抗治疗磷脂酶A2受体相关膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:单中心回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 379-384.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[4] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10~25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[5] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[6] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[7] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[8] 王亚岚, 倪婧, 余世庆, 陶银花, 张荣. 尼达尼布抗纤维化治疗特发性肺纤维化的耐受性和疗效预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 750-755.
[9] 詹济玮, 蔡柳春, 温琼娜, 郭石生, 温春妹, 温鹤明. 布地格福联合噻托溴铵治疗AECOPD 的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 823-826.
[10] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[11] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[12] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[13] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[14] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[15] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?