切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 166 -171. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.03.015

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

机器人肝胆胰手术Trocar布置方法的教学与实践
赵国栋1, 刘荣1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院肝胆外二科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-12 出版日期:2018-06-30
  • 通信作者: 刘荣
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81500499); 国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0110405)

Teaching and clinic application of trocar placement in the robotic hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery

Guodong Zhao1, Rong Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department II of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA (Peoples′Liberation Army) General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2018-04-12 Published:2018-06-30
  • Corresponding author: Rong Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Rong, Email:
引用本文:

赵国栋, 刘荣. 机器人肝胆胰手术Trocar布置方法的教学与实践[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(03): 166-171.

Guodong Zhao, Rong Liu. Teaching and clinic application of trocar placement in the robotic hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 11(03): 166-171.

目的

机器人手术是肝胆胰外科发展方向,目前绝大多数单位仍在开展早期,在Trocar布置方面缺乏经验,且无文献系统介绍。本研究基于大样本量机器人肝胆胰手术(robotic hepato-pancreato biliary surgery, RHPBS)经验,总结布孔原则、具体方法,希望对早期开展RHPBS医师有所帮助。

方法

2011年11月至2017年10月手术团队共完成1 600例RHPBS,其中胰腺1 048例、肝脏377例、胆道118例、其他57例。Trocar布置首先参考腹腔镜手术布孔方法,结合术中操作体验及所遇问题而不断优化,改善操作舒适度,多方兼顾,提高手术效率,减少中转率,总结经验,并针对常见RHPBS,制定模式化布孔和特殊布孔。

结果

总结四大布孔原则(脐周主操作侧置镜原则、主线对称原则、对侧牵引原则、平腹8 cm间距原则),制定适用于肝胆胰常见手术的3种模式化布孔和3种特殊布孔。

结论

本方法经由大量临床实践形成和检验,简明易学,布孔时遵循基本原则,可确保不出现严重错误,术中巧用Trocar in Trocar技巧等改善操作。模式化布孔易重复,便于初学者借鉴,特殊手术应特殊布孔,简化操作。

Objective

Robotic surgery show enormous potential in Hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery during recent decades. However, the ports placements always be confused and related studies was deficiency. Therefore, our study aims to describe our experience with ports position in Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery (RHPBS) and to summarize the principle.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1 600 patients who underwent RHPBS by our surgery team between Nov. 2011 and Oct. 2017 at the PLA General Hospital in Beijing, China. It was included 1 048 cases of pancreatic surgery, 377 cases liver surgery, 118 cases biliary surgery and 57 cases other types of robotic surgery. In the early stage, we position the ports as traditional laparoscopy reference, then improve the ports position combine with intraoperative adjustment, thereby forming pattern of regular ports position for RHPBS.

Results

The four primary principles of RHPBS were concluded: Manipulation-oriented Peri-umbilicus Camera Port, Symmetry Operative-Arm Ports, Opposite Retractor-Arm Port, Eight centimeter Prots Rule, and the 3 patterns of perforation and 3 kinds of special perforation suitable for common and special hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery were formulated.

Conclusions

Ports position experience based on thousand cases was summarize and concluded and then it put forward follow the RHPBS ports position primary principle, that is easy to grasp the key points and facilitate the operation. Four primary principles of RHPBS well proven in safety, feasible and superiority. Standardization of regular robotic HPB surgery will improve the surgery accomplishment and patients′ prognosis.

图1 机器人肝脏手术模式化布孔
图2 机器人近端胰腺和胆道手术模式化布孔
图3 机器人远端胰腺和脾脏手术模式化布孔
图4 机器人肝左外叶切除术特殊布孔
图5 机器人高位高段肝脏切除术特殊布孔
图6 机器人后腹腔镜胰腺手术特殊布孔
[1]
Ocuin LM, Tsung A. Minimally invasive hepatic surgery[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2016, 96(2): 299-313.
[2]
Baker EH, Ross SW, Seshadri R, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2015, 6(4): 396-405.
[3]
Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, et al. Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature[J]. Hepatobiliary Surgery & Nutrition, 2016, 5(4): 311-321.
[4]
Rodríguezsanjuán JC, Gómezruiz M, Trugedacarrera S, et al. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: present and future directions[J]. World journal of gastroenterology, 2016, 22(6): 1975-2004.
[5]
Memeo R, Sangiuolo F, De BV, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: state of the art[J]. Journal of Visceral Surgery, 2016, 153(5): 353-359.
[6]
Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2014, 259(3): 549-555.
[7]
Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2013, 257(1): 128-132.
[8]
Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours[J]. HPB, 2010, 12(8): 583-586.
[9]
Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, et al. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2011, 18(4): 471-480.
[10]
Lai E CH, Yang GPC, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome[J]. American Journal of Surgery, 2013, 205(6): 697-702.
[11]
Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, et al. Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes[J]. Archives of Surgery, 2011, 146(7): 844-850.
[12]
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections[J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(1): 29-39.
[13]
Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH, et al. Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26(8): 2247-2258.
[14]
Wu YM, Hu RH, Lai HS, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection[J]. Asian Journal of Surgery, 2014, 37(2): 53-57.
[15]
Zureikat AH, Hogg ME, Rd ZH. The utility of the robot in pancreatic resections[J]. Advances in Surgery, 2014, 48(1): 77-95.
[16]
Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience[J]. Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques, 2010, 24(7): 1646-1657.
[17]
Fernandes E, Giulianotti PC. Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery[J]. Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Sciences, 2013, 20(6): 583-589.
[18]
Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, et al. Indications, technique, and results of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Updates Surg, 2016, 68(3): 1-11.
[19]
Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution′s experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220(1): 18-27.
[20]
Paritosh S, John R, Anusak Y. Robotic distal pancreatectomy[J]. Jsls Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2013, 17(4): 627-635.
[21]
赵国栋,胡明根,刘荣. 模式化腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术:附71例临床应用报道[J]. 南方医科大学学报,2011, 31(4):737-740.
[22]
Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, et al. Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25(12): 3815-3824.
[23]
Inoue Y, Suzuki Y, Fujii K, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection using the lateral approach from intercostal ports in segments 6, 7, and 8[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(12): 2135-2143.
[24]
Ichida H, Ishizawa T, Tanaka M, et al. Use of intercostal trocars for laparoscopic resection of subphrenic hepatic tumors[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31(3): 1-7.
[25]
Morise Z. Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior tumors using caudal approach and postural changes: a new technical approach[J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, 22(47): 10267-10274.
[26]
Zhao G, Xue R, Ma X, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic pancreatectomy: a new surgical option for pancreatic disease[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26(6): 1609-1616.
[27]
Zhao G, Hu M, Liu R, et al. Two anatomical pathways for retroperitoneoscopic pancreatectomy: indications for the posterior and lateral approaches [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2015, 39(2): 555.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[3] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[4] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[5] 党军强, 杨雁灵, 汪庆强, 尚琳, 朱磊, 项红军. 主动经皮穿刺引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发急性坏死物积聚的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 671-674.
[6] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[7] 栗粟, 王义刚, 汪俊州, 等. 达芬奇机器人辅助胰头肿瘤局部切除+胰腺端端吻合术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 360-362.
[8] 任江波, 李丽, 王萍. 阻断PI3K/Akt信号通路促进低表达FoxA2肝脏前体细胞对分化诱导剂应答并朝肝细胞方向分化[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 336-343.
[9] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[10] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[11] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[12] 史清泉, 苗彬, 王烁, 陶琳, 沈晨. miR-181a-5p 靶向ATG5 抑制雨蛙素诱导的大鼠胰腺腺泡细胞AR42J自噬的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 524-530.
[13] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[14] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[15] 杨爽, 余宏亮, 谢敏. CT 与超声检查对急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 541-544.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?