切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01): 43 -46. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.01.012

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献资源库

论著 上一篇    下一篇

正常与超重患者的机器人和腹腔镜胃癌根治对比
刘新 1, 李鹏 1, 刘元圣 1, 刘洪一 1, 贾宝庆 1 , ( )   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院普通外二科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-10 出版日期:2018-02-28
  • 通信作者: 贾宝庆
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81772929)

Comparison of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients with normal weight and overweight

Xin Liu 1, Peng Li 1, Yuansheng Liu 1, Hongyi Liu 1, Baoqing Jia 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department 2 of General Surgery, the General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2018-01-10 Published:2018-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Baoqing Jia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jia Baoqing, Email:
目的

比较机器人和腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术在体质量指数正常和超重患者中的临床疗效。

方法

回顾分析解放军总医院普通外二科自2012年6月至2017年6月手术的515例胃癌患者的临床资料,其中机器人手术302例、腹腔镜手术213例,按照体质量指数<24 kg/m2和≥24 kg/m2分为体质量指数正常组和超重组,比较正常组和超重组的机器人和腹腔镜手术的围手术期结果。

结果

同腹腔镜手术比较,在正常组和超重组中,机器人手术均有手术时间长[(219.7 ± 40.3)min vs (190.1 ± 38.5)min、P<0.000,(238.9 ± 44.0)min vs (211.8 ± 43.8)min、P<0.000]和术中出血量少[(155.5 ± 198.0)ml vs (196.3 ± 172.6)ml、P<0.000,(166.6 ± 162.0)ml vs (209.4 ± 224.9)ml、P< 0.000]的特点,术后进流食时间、术后住院时间和并发症发生率比较无差异(均P> 0.05)。正常组机器人清扫淋巴结数更多[(26.0 ± 9.6)枚vs (21.8 ± 9.5)枚、P<0.000];超重组机器人和腹腔镜手术比较无统计学差异[(22.9 ± 7.2)枚vs (22.3 ± 9.5)枚、P=0.310]。

结论

机器人胃癌根治术在体质量指数正常组和超重组的患者中均安全、有效,同腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术在正常组的患者中清扫淋巴结数多,或许具有一定优势。

Objective

To compare the surgical outcome of robotic and laparoscopic radical gastectomy in patients with normal weight and overweight.

Methods

From Jun. 2012 to Jun. 2017, a total of 515 patients with gastric cancer who underwent robotic gastrectomy (RG, n=302) or laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG, n=213) in our department were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorized into normal weight(body mass index <24 kg/m2) or overweight (body mass index≥24 kg/m2) group. The perioperative outcomes of RG or LG were compared in the two groups.

Results

In both normal weight and overweight group, RG shown longer operation time [(219.7 ± 40.3)min vs (190.1 ± 38.5)min, P<0.000; (238.9 ± 44.0)min vs (211.8 ± 43.8)min, P<0.000] and less estimated blood loss[(155.5 ± 198.0)ml vs (196.3 ± 172.6)ml, P<0.000; (166.6 ± 162.0)ml vs (209.4 ± 224.9)ml, P<0.000] compared with LG, while there was no significant difference in time of eating liquid diet, postoperative stay and complication rate (P> 0.05). There were more retrieved lymph nodes in the normal weight group by RG [(26.0 ± 9.6) vs (21.8 ± 9.5), P<0.000]. However, it was not significantly different in the overweight group [(22.9 ± 7.2) vs (22.3 ± 9.5), P= 0.310].

Conclusions

RG is safe and effective in both normal weight and overweight group. RG may have the advantage of more retrieved lymph nodes in the normal weight group compared with LG.

表1 体质量指数正常组276例胃癌根治术患者的两组一般资料比较
表2 体质量指数超重组239例胃癌根治术患者的两组一般资料比较
表3 体质量指数正常组276例胃癌根治术患者的两组围手术期资料比较
表4 体质量指数超重组239例胃癌根治术患者的两组围手术期资料比较
[1]
Chen K, Pan Y, Zhang B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis [J]. Bmc Surgery, 2017, 17(1): 93-93.
[2]
刘国晓,申伟松,陈凛,等. 机器人与腹腔镜胃癌手术临床疗效对比的Meta分析 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(3):328-333.
[3]
刘江,阮虎,赵坤,等. 达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜行胃癌根治术的对照研究 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2014,18(5):461-464.
[4]
张小磊,江志伟,赵坤. 手术机器人系统与腹腔镜辅助胃癌切除术的临床疗效对比 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(8):804-806.
[5]
李鹏,李冰,刘洪一,等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统在胃癌中的应用[J]. 临床与病理杂志,2015, 35(6):1103-1106.
[6]
Noshiro H, Shimizu S, Nagai E, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer - is it beneficial for patients of heavier weight[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2003, 238(5): 680-685.
[7]
Yasuda K, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in obese and nonobese patients [J]. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2004, 18(8): 1253-1256.
[8]
Kim KH, Kim MC, Jung GJ, et al. The impact of obesity on ladg for early gastric cancer [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2006, 9(4): 303-307.
[9]
Tsujinaka T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, et al. Influence of overweight on surgical complications for gastric cancer: results from a randomized control trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic D3 lymphadenectomy (jcog9501) [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007, 14(2): 355-361.
[10]
Lee HJ, Kim HH, Kim MC, et al. The impact of a high body mass index on laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques, 2009, 23(11): 2473-2479.
[11]
Bernardini MQ, Gien LT, Tipping H, et al. Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy [J]. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2012, 22(1): 76-81.
[12]
Moskovic DJ, Lavery HJ, Rehman J, et al. High body mass index does not affect outcomes following robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy [J]. Canadian Journal of Urology, 2010, 17(4): 5291-5298.
[13]
Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, et al. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures [J]. Annals of Surgery, 2009, 249(6): 927-932.
[14]
Yoon HM, Kim YW, Lee JH, et al. Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer [J]. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2012, 26(5): 1377-1381.
[1] 关赛楠, 周希, 菅翠玲, 陈伟强, 傅绢, 宋长琳, 袁帆, 许尔蛟. 胃壁厚度在超声筛查胃部病变中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(08): 782-787.
[2] 吴丰信, 吴英光, 俞建雄, 王胜. 腹腔镜辅助保留幽门胃部分切除术治疗早期胃中部癌近期疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 326-330.
[3] 周仕海, 陈宏, 张静, 雒洪志, 冯春在, 孙浩, 钟思全. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取出标本手术67例分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 340-343.
[4] 翟育豪, 郑智, 邓薇, 白志刚, 尹杰, 张军. 进展期胃癌新辅助化疗争议的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 386-390.
[5] 术者:张树彬 助手:邢中强 段佳悦 李昂 指导老师:刘建华 剪辑:徐晨. 健侧先行原位右半肝+全尾状叶切除的腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治术[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 0-.
[6] 褚薛慧. 腹腔镜肝右后叶切除术[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 0-.
[7] 卢攀 刘心怡 李坚 陈龙 张伟. 经脐单孔腹腔镜左半肝切除术[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 0-.
[8] 张硕, 杨军, 顾元龙. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术致胆道损伤的危险因素及处理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 470-473.
[9] 吴志明, 黄洪军, 孟兴成, 葛佳皓, 沈丽青, 胡常恩, 虞洪. ERAS理念在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 474-478.
[10] 丁天龙, 谷保红, 李雪梅, 胡继科, 张凡, 冯泽东, 马斌, 王琛, 陈昊. "脱衣法"腹腔镜胆囊切除术的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 498-501.
[11] 王峰杰, 陈焕伟, 刘颖, 雷秋成, 宁燕文. 腹腔镜胰体尾切除手术入路及安全性[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 506-509.
[12] 李国林, 王秀, 陈桂婵, 邱逸红. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术围手术期标准化管理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 510-513.
[13] 李涛, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 沙地克·阿帕尔, 白磊, 曹峻, 何翼彪, 王智鹏, 赵晋明. 全腹腔镜活体供肝右半肝切取术一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 514-518.
[14] 姜琪琪, 丰义宽, 张凯, 李倩, 季万胜. Δ133p53在rmhTNF干预人胃癌细胞MKN-45移植瘤生长中的作用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 215-219.
[15] 蓝炘, 朴成林, 安峰铎, 谈明坤, 司振铎, 吴蔚, 赵娜, 冷建军. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜下肝癌切除术的短期疗效比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 327-330.
阅读次数
全文


摘要