切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 257 -261. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.05.001

所属专题： 文献；

论著

经皮内镜腰神经根减压术后疼痛症状改善进展的研究
黄良诚1, 郭燕梅2, 李宁1, 陈锦旭1, 曾祥超1, 车路阳1, 郭清华1, 薛大鹏1, 张西峰1, 黄鹏1,†()   
  1. 1. 100853　北京，解放军总医院骨科
    2. 100853　北京，解放军总医院南楼康复科
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-25 出版日期:2016-10-30
  • 通信作者: 黄鹏

The study of the early recovery in low back pain and leg pain after the percutaneous endoscopicsurgery

Liangcheng Huang1, Yanmei Guo2, Ning Li1, Jinxu Chen1, Xiangchao Zeng1, Luyang Che1, Qinghua Guo1, Dapeng Xue1, Xifeng Zhang1, Peng Huang1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Rehabilitation, Nanlou of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2016-07-25 Published:2016-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Peng Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Peng, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

黄良诚, 郭燕梅, 李宁, 陈锦旭, 曾祥超, 车路阳, 郭清华, 薛大鹏, 张西峰, 黄鹏. 经皮内镜腰神经根减压术后疼痛症状改善进展的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(05): 257-261.

Liangcheng Huang, Yanmei Guo, Ning Li, Jinxu Chen, Xiangchao Zeng, Luyang Che, Qinghua Guo, Dapeng Xue, Xifeng Zhang, Peng Huang. The study of the early recovery in low back pain and leg pain after the percutaneous endoscopicsurgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(05): 257-261.

目的

观察评估经皮脊柱内镜腰神经根减压术(PELD)术后腰腿疼痛症状的早期改善进展。

方法

对解放军总医院2015年1月至2016年1月连续93例中84例PELD治疗腰背痛及神经根性疼痛症状的患者，前瞻性记录术后12周(各1周1次)的腰背痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和下肢痛VAS，观察评估两种疼痛症状的改善进展并比较两者的改善度，用术后12周时腰背痛及下肢痛VAS、功能障碍指数评分(ODI)和改良MacNab疗效评定标准评价手术疗效。

结果

腰背痛症状术后VAS评分相邻两周间比较，差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)；下肢痛症状术后VAS评分的术后2周与术后1周比较[(2.96 ± 1.97)分 vs (2.10 ± 1.29)分]、术后4周与术后3周比较[(2.04 ± 1.62)分 vs (2.46 ± 1.97)分]，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；余下相邻两周间比较，差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)；下肢痛术后12周VAS改善度与腰背痛VAS改善度比较[(6.64 ± 1.47)分 vs (3.36 ± 1.38)分]，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)；术后12周时ODI、腰背痛VAS、下肢痛VAS均较术前显著降低[(12.82 ± 6.39)分 vs (53.64 ± 11.73)分、(1.16 ± 1.06)分 vs (4.52 ± 0.65)分、(1.29 ± 1.30)分 vs (7.93 ± 0.81)分]，改良MacNab疗效评定标准评价优良率为86%。

结论

PELD术后早期12周，腰背痛的症状改善平稳，下肢痛的症状改善在术后2周、术后3周出现波动，下肢痛症状比腰背痛症状改善更快，手术疗效显著。

关键词: 下腰痛, 神经根性病变, 改善进展, 经皮脊柱内镜, 减压术
Objectives

To observe and assess the early recovery in low back pain and leg pain after the decompression of lumbar nerve root using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).

Methods

From Jan. 2015 to Jan. 2016, in 93 consecutive patients, 84 consecutive patients with low back pain and radicular pain were treated by using PELD. Visual analog score (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain were collected once a week, at consecutively postoperative 12 weeks , then compared the scores between adjacent two weeks separately. Outcome measures consisted of Oswestry Disability Index score (ODI) and VAS score of low back pain and leg pain between preoperative and postoperative, and modified MacNab criteria were compared.

Results

There was no difference between the adjacent two weeks in postoperative low back pain VAS score (P> 0.05). The difference of postoperative leg pain VAS score between 2 weeks and 1 week [(2.96 ± 1.97) vs (2.10 ± 1.29)], 4 weeks and 3 weeks [(2.04 ± 1.62) vs (2.46 ± 1.97)], were significant (P< 0.05). There was no difference of postoperative leg pain VAS score between other adjacent 2 weeks (P> 0.05). The ODI score and VAS score of low back pain and leg pain at 12 weeks postoperative were lower significantly than at preoperative [(12.82 ± 6.39) vs (53.64 ± 11.73), (1.16 ± 1.06) vs (4.52 ± 0.65), (1.29 ± 1.30) vs (7.93 ± 0.81)]. Based on the evaluation of the modified MacNab, excellent and good rate was 86%.

Conclusions

There was no obvious fluctuation in postoperative low back pain, and there were obvious fluctuations in postoperative leg pain at 2 weeks and 3 weeks. With 12 weeks follow-up, PELD had a better result in low back pain, leg pain and state of life.

Key words: Low back pain, Radicular neuropathy, Recovery, Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), Surgical decompression
图1 神经根性腰腿疼痛患者的术前影像资料
图2 神经根性腰腿疼痛患者的术中穿刺、置管的C臂机透视
图3 神经根性腰腿疼痛患者的术中镜下
表1 神经根性腰腿疼痛患者的术前、术后12周的ODI、腰背痛VAS、腿痛VAS评分比较(分，± s)
项目 ODI 腰背痛VAS 下肢痛VAS
术前 53.64 ± 11.73 4.52 ± 0.65 7.93 ± 0.81
术后12周 12.82 ± 6.39 1.16 ± 1.06 1.29 ± 1.30
表2 神经根性腰腿疼痛患者的术后1～12周腰背痛、下肢痛VAS评分(分，±s)
术后 腰背痛VAS 下肢痛VAS
1周 1.80 ± 0.87 2.10 ± 1.29
2周 1.88 ± 0.88 2.96 ± 1.97
3周 2.12 ± 1.24 2.46 ± 1.97
4周 1.88 ± 1.30 2.04 ± 1.62
5周 1.80 ± 1.69 1.79 ± 1.70
6周 1.56 ± 1.42 1.82 ± 1.59
7周 1.60 ± 1.22 1.64 ± 1.64
8周 1.52 ± 1.26 1.75 ± 1.51
9周 1.56 ± 1.36 1.68 ± 1.56
10周 1.32 ± 0.99 1.50 ± 1.35
11周 1.40 ± 1.22 1.46 ± 1.29
12周 1.16 ± 1.07 1.29 ± 1.30
1
董扬，曾炳芳．腰椎间盘突出症术后短期疼痛原因分析(附2例报告) [J]. 实用骨科杂志，2002, 8(3): 172-173.
2
闫家智，林欣，潘海涛，等. 经皮椎间孔内窥镜下手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的近期疗效观察 [J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2011, 21 (3): 189-192.
3
党靖东，高利强，刘务杰，等．脊柱内窥镜下技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析 [J]. 中国医学创新，2014, 11 (5): 37-39.
4
Huang P, Sengupta DK. How fast pain, numbness, and paresthesia resolves after lumbar nerve root decompression: a retrospective study of patient′s self-reported computerized pain drawing [J]. Spine, 2014, 39 (8): 529-536.
5
张琳，张西峰，侯克东，等．改良YESS技术在治疗腰椎间盘突出症中应用的中期临床疗效观察 [J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志，2015, 20 (6): 499-503.
6
曾祥超，黄鹏，张西峰．经皮内镜治疗老年腰椎间盘突出与椎管狭窄的比较 [J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志：电子版，2016, 9 (1): 33-37.
7
王洪伟，李长青，周跃．腰椎间盘突出症疼痛发生机制的研究进展 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志，2011, 19 (7): 568-571.
8
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation. The spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT): a randomized trial [J]. JAMA, 2006, 296 (20): 2441-2450.
9
Gibson J, Waddell G. Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse: updated cochrane review [J]. Spine, 2007, 32 (16): 1735 -1748.
10
王刚，刘尚礼，程志安，等．椎间盘切除术对腰椎间盘突出症腰痛的影响 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志，2009, 17 (1): 23-26.
11
Murata Y, Nannmark U, Rydevik B, et al. Nucleus pulposus-induced apoptosis in dorsal root ganglion following experimental disc herniation in rats [J]. Spine, 2006, 31 (4): 382 -390.
12
Otoshi K, Kikuchi S, Konno S, et al. The reactions of glial cells and endoneurial macrophages in the dorsal root ganglion and their contribution to pain-related behavior after application of nucleus pulposus onto the nerve root in rats [J]. Spine, 2010, 35 (3): 264-271.
13
Zhang KB, Zheng ZM, Liu H, et al. The effects of punctured nucleus pulposus on lumbar radicular pain in rats: a behavioral and immunohistochemical study [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2009, 11 (4): 492-500.
14
Virri J, Gronblad M, Seitsalo S, et al .Comparison of the prevalence of inflammatory cells in subtypes of disc herniations and associations with straight leg raising [J]. Spine, 2001, 26 (21): 2311-2315.
15
Windsor RC, Vernau KM, Sturges BK, et al. Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid in dogs with type I intervertebral disc herniation [J]. J Vet Intern Med, 2008, 22 (4): 954-960.
16
Pearson AM, Blood EA, Frymoyer JW, et al. SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain: does treatment, location, or morphology matter [J]．Spine, 2008, 33 (4): 428-435.
[1] 李甲, 沈罡, 朱光耀, 陈茂送, 王波定. 大面积脑梗死去骨瓣减压术后迟发性脑过度灌注综合征的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(02): 111-117.
[2] 孙强, 郭晓忠, 王冉东, 李兵, 岳聚安, 刘忘言, 陈蛟. 双粗通道减压植骨+结构性骨支撑治疗早期股骨头坏死疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 490-495.
[3] 李芸, 游云华. 囊腔冲洗对颌骨囊性病变开窗减压术疗效的影响[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 89-93.
[4] 马瑞, 徐文芹, 李月月, 胡至察, 张国禄, 吴畏, 胡健, 马建民, 杨新吉. 非开眶小切口内外壁均衡减压术治疗甲状腺相关眼病的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 268-272.
[5] 李丽丽, 陈鑫, 赵世光, 杨赫. 后颅窝减压联合不同硬脑膜处理方式对Chiari畸形Ⅰ型患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 206-212.
[6] 冷昭富, 汪永新. 儿童去骨瓣减压术后颅骨成形术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 313-317.
[7] 郭鹏, 李锦平. 去骨瓣减压术后与颅骨缺损相关的并发症及其防治[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 119-122.
[8] 王永楠, 王启弘, 殷杰, 欧春影. 锁孔开颅微血管减压术治疗前庭阵发症的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 43-47.
[9] 张黎. 周围神经减压术与周围神经源性疼痛[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 1-6.
[10] 郭永坤, 单峤, 付旭东, 李培栋, 谢井伟, 周少龙, 刘婉清, 刘春颖. 显微血管减压术治疗原发性舌咽神经痛[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 318-319.
[11] 任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 刘学来, 于炎冰. 脑干听觉诱发电位在面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 87-91.
[12] 魏宜功, 周焜, 陈光唐, 王诚, 刘窗溪. 颅内压监测下改良阶梯减压法结合去骨瓣减压治疗颅内高压的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 28-33.
[13] 张川, 姚宝群. 外伤性视神经病变的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 369-372.
[14] 麦哈巴·萨迪克, 赵启霞, 肖艳. 痛性糖尿病周围神经病变下肢周围神经减压术与常规药物疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 174-180.
[15] 史鹏飞, 王常伟, 郭亚洲, 刘霄, 李锴, 刘禹, 何兵, 赵余涛, 刘德中. 经皮穿刺球囊压迫与显微血管减压术治疗老年人三叉神经痛的疗效及安全性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 258-262.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号