切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 204 -208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.04.004

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

内镜采集大隐静脉的冠状动脉旁路移植术1 573例应用体会
徐殊1, 吴海波1,(), 王辉山1, 王强1, 张建1   
  1. 1. 110016 沈阳军区总医院心血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-06 出版日期:2016-08-30
  • 通信作者: 吴海波
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81500315); 辽宁省博士科研启动基金项目(201501026)

Curative effect observation and experience summary with endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting in 1 573 cases

Shu Xu1, Haibo Wu1,(), Huishan Wang1, Qiang Wang1, Jian Zhang1   

  1. 1. The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang 110016, China
  • Received:2016-06-06 Published:2016-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Haibo Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Haibo, Email:
引用本文:

徐殊, 吴海波, 王辉山, 王强, 张建. 内镜采集大隐静脉的冠状动脉旁路移植术1 573例应用体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(04): 204-208.

Shu Xu, Haibo Wu, Huishan Wang, Qiang Wang, Jian Zhang. Curative effect observation and experience summary with endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting in 1 573 cases[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 09(04): 204-208.

目的

对单中心8年间的1 573例冠状动脉旁路移植术中应用内镜大隐静脉采集术的患者进行疗效观察评估及经验总结。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月至2016年4月沈阳军区总医院应用内镜采集大隐静脉的冠状动脉旁路移植术患者,共计1 573例,观察并分析围手术期心肌梗死、术后室颤等与血管桥采集质量相关的术后并发症的发生,同时观察下肢术后疼痛、水肿、切口感染等情况。集中选取2014年3月至5月间连续70例应用内镜采集大隐静脉的冠状动脉旁路移植术患者,于术后1周复查64排冠状动脉CT评估术后近期血管桥通畅情况。

结果

应用内镜采集的大隐静脉大体质量满意。住院期间死亡患者共18例。其中出现术后围手术期心肌梗死9例,死亡5例;出现术后频发室颤5例,死亡4例;出现术后脑梗死12例,死亡5例;出现4例多脏器功能衰竭,均死亡。术后下肢水肿和切口疼痛明显减轻,切口感染及愈合不良情况明显减少。术后近期血管桥通畅情况理想。

结论

长时间大样本量的应用,充分证明内镜大隐静脉采集术具有微创、减轻疼痛等优点,加快恢复进程,避免大面积瘢痕形成后导致运动不便,加之远期的美容效果,有效提高患者的生命质量,是一项成熟有效的技术。

Objective

Curative effect observation and experience summary with endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting for 1 573 cases in single center between 8 years.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the totaling 1 573 cases coronary artery bypass grafting operation with endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting between Jan. 2009 and Apr. 2016 in the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region. Observation and analysis of the postoperative complications related to Bridge blood vessel acquisition quality just like perioperative myocardial infarction and postoperative ventricular fibrillation, and the lower limb postoperative pain, edema, wound infection and other conditions were observed at the same time. Selected 70 consecutive cases from Mar. to May in 2014 which reviewed with the 64 slice coronary CT imaging at 1 week after operation.

Results

The quality of acquisition from endoscopic saphenous vein were satisfied. A total of 18 cases of death during hospitalization. There were 9 cases of perioperative myocardial infarction include 5 death cases, 5 cases of frequent ventricular fibrillation include 4 death cases, 12 cases of cerebral infarction include 5 death cases, 4 cases of multiple organ failure and all died. Postoperative lower extremity edema and wound pain were significantly reduced, and the wound infection and healing were significantly decreased. The patency of vascular bridge is ideal in the near future.

Conclusions

Endoscopic vessel acquisition is a safe, mature and effective technique. Minimally invasive purposes can be achieved under the premise of vascular acquisition quality. It reduced the wound infection of lower extremity surgery, poor healing, wound pain and local edema. The recovery process was expedited. Action inconvenience caused by large area of scar formation was to avoided. Coupled with long-term cosmetic effect. All above effectively improve the patient′s quality of life.

图1 冠状动脉旁路移植术患者术后1周64排螺旋冠状动脉CT检查
1
吴海波,徐殊,赵科研,等. 机器人取乳内动脉小切口冠状动脉搭桥术体会[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2014, 7(4): 5-7.
2
徐学增,李华. 机器人心脏手术的现状与展望[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2013, 6 (5): 20-22.
3
Williams JB, Peterson ED, Brennan JM, et al. Association between endoscopic vs open vein-graft harvesting and mortality, wound complications, and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing CABG surgery [J]. JAMA, 2012, 308 (3): 475-484.
4
Khan SZ, Rivero M, McCraith B, et al. Endoscopic vein harvest does not negatively affect patency of great saphenous vein lower extremity bypass [J]. J Vasc Surg , 2016, 63(6): 1546-1554.
5
Teixeira PG, Woo K, Weaver FA, et al. Vein harvesting technique for infrainguinal arterial bypass with great saphenous vein and its association with surgical site infection and graft patency [J]. J Vasc Surg , 2015, 61 (4): 1262-1271.
6
Santo VJ, Dargon PT, Azarbal AF, et al. Open versus endoscopic great saphenous vein harvest for lower extremity revascularization of critical limb ischemia [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2014, 59 (2): 427-434.
7
Sastry P, Rivinius R, Harvey R, et al. The influence of endoscopic vein harvesting on outcomes after coronary bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 267 525 patients [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg , 2013, 44(4): 980-989.
8
Krishnamoorthy B, Critchley WR, Glover AT, et al. A randomized study comparing three groups of vein harvesting methods for coronary artery bypass grafting: endoscopic harvest versus standard bridging and open techniques [J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2012, 15 (2): 224-228.
9
Brown EN, Kon ZN, Tran R, et al. Strategies to reduce intraluminal clot formation in endoscopically harvested saphenous veins [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007, 134 (5): 1259-1265.
10
Hashmi SF, Krishnamoorthy B, Critchley WR, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of human saphenous vein harvested by endoscopic and open conventional methods [J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 20 (1): 178-185.
11
Brat R, Horacek J, Sieja J. Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a leg-related morbidity and histological comparison [J]. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub , 2013, 157 (1): 70-74.
12
Dao K, Malgor RD, Montecalvo J, et al. Current status of endoscopic vein harvest in cardiac and peripheral vascular surgery [J]. Cardiol Rev , 2012, 20 (2): 312-318.
13
Kiani S, Poston R. Is endoscopic harvesting bad for saphenous vein graft patency in coronary surgery [J]. Curr Opin Cardiol, 2011, 26(3): 518-522.
14
Rousou LJ, Taylor KB, Lu XG, et al. Saphenous vein conduits harvested by endoscopic technique exhibit structural and functional damage [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 87 (1): 62-70.
15
Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery [J]. N Engl J Med , 2009, 361 (1): 235-244.
16
Wang H, Wu H, Jiang H, et al. Initial experience with endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting in Chinese patients [J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2011, 14 (1): 291-296.
17
Zingaro C, Pierri MD, Massi F, et al. Absorption of carbon dioxide during endoscopic vein harvest [J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2012, 15 (2): 661-664.
[1] 陈思骄, 刘娅妮, 张艺. 右心室心肌自动功能成像对冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期不良事件的风险预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 114-120.
[2] 周元, 杨秀滨. 非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后机械通气时间延长的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(03): 181-187.
[3] 邹以席, 刘金松, 陈密, 黄方炯. 呼气末正压容量试验评估不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术患者容量反应性的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(02): 85-90.
[4] 王家阳, 张魁, 董然, 王健. 术前他汀类药物治疗对冠状动脉旁路移植术后胸骨切口感染事件和主要心脑血管不良事件发生的影响[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(02): 128-132.
[5] 陈华文, 仇成华, 李晓青, 谢鹏. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后手术部位感染风险预测模型及管理策略[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 39-46.
[6] 叶晓芳, 杨京华, 武元星, 朱光发. COPD患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后肺部感染的预后影响及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 175-179.
[7] 南文慧, 周丽花, 李珊珊, 荣嵘. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后行hs-TnI预测主要心血管不良事件发生的临界值及相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-242.
[8] 李丹, 刘璞娟, 卞亚辉, 张会军, 王莉. 动机性访谈结合阶段性健康教育对冠状动脉旁路移植术后健康行为的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(11): 1151-1156.
[9] 王文珠, 刘建, 袁常秀, 石亚飞, 尤培军. 竖脊肌平面阻滞对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中阿片类药物用量的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 155-159.
[10] 李传威, 葛畅, 程兆云, 刘前进, 孙俊杰, 胡俊龙. 大隐静脉的获取方式对冠状动脉旁路移植术效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 215-220.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?